why-jesus-is-not-God

This article is made for those that have never grown up with any Judaic background, yet want to learn about who and/or what the "messiah /christ" is according to the faith of the Jewish prophets. In order to have a correct understanding of the doctrines or beliefs surrounding the Jewish messiah, one must understand the theology of Judaism, instead of what any 'Christian' institution might say about him. This is not meant to sound offensive by any means, rather I am simply being straight forward: mainstream "Christianity," whether churches, various denominations, or their many universities are a total disconnect from the biblically minded Jew or what Judaism has taught for centuries and millenniums through the Hebrew prophets who lived long before Jesus was even born and the advent or dawn of "Christianity." Keep in mind that the prophets and seers of the Hebrew people uttered the very words of Yehowah Himself [the sole God of Israel] as He moved upon them and spoke to them.

Another reason for wanting to go to a Torah-observant person that is well educated in his Judaism instead of a simple layman or observer of the commandments is so that he can give you a correct understanding of what the "messiah" is all about. For the whole notion surrounding "a messiah" or "a saviour" came from the Jewish or Hebrew people. So, honestly speaking, you would never want to go to some non-Judaic incompetent person that would not know what he is talking about, nor the things regarding the biblical faith known as Judaism. I, on the other hand, will try to explain things to you very clarity so that you can see why most Israelites don't accept Jesus as their messiah, nor "christianity," after talking with a mainstream "christian," or after reading their writings, or seeing their churches and their manner lifestyle in which they live. Notice I did not say, "...after reading Jesus' words and what he did." I say this because this paper will try to differentiate the great differences between the Jesus of the Gospels vs. the Jesus of mainstream christianity and, thirdly, the messiah of the prophets of Israel.

Mainstream 'Christianity' [i.e. Catholics, Protestants, Lutherans, Methodists, Pentecostals, Assemblies of God, Baptists, Church of Christ, Church of God, Church of the Nazarenes, and....] teach the direct opposite of what Judaism teaches in many regards and in many of their major tenets of faith, yet they have the gall to claim they are rooted in Judaism, which could not be further from the truth. Keep in mind that I said, "mainstream Christianity," not those those that are truly seeking after the truth, like yourself by the evidence that you are reading this page.

Four major tenets of "mainstream Christianity" or "orthodox" christianity goes directly against the prophets of Israel and what we have taught since the days of Abraham. And, if I may be so bold, even from the days of Adam himself. Here are those 5 things:

1. Our God is not a compound god of three individuals or personalities or characters. Whereas, mainstream christianity teaches that the Hebrew God is the "Father, Son and Holy Spirit," being three but one. To us Jews, if I were to use "Christian" lingo for a moment, only the Father is our God and He is most holy of all spirits. The messiah, on the other hand - according to the prophets of Judaism, is the greatest of all His prophets and servants. The messiah in Judaism is neither divine, not eternal, but a person of this creation, like everyone else [such as us humans, angels, cherubs, seraphs, spiritual horses [2 Kings 2 and so forth]. The messiah according to Judaism or the prophets, must walk in their footsteps by not only keeping and promoting the Torah [the laws of Yehowah in which He gave to Moses and other prophets and our ancestors, like Abraham], but that he will reign over the whole entire earth as the sole monarch and that the Torah will be the only body of laws of his monarchy. His monarchy, therefore, will be a holy theocracy as was King David's and Melchizedek's. Likewise, according to the prophets, all those that have not kept the torah when he arrives shall be banished to his prison and shall not enjoy his sovereignty, but shall only know his wrath. Thus, according to Judaism, they are only two main individuals: Yehowah, the only Eternal One of all the spirits. The second person, who is neither divine, nor eternal, but a servant - is the so-called, "moshiach," a very holy Torah observant Jew, not just an Israelite, that is chosen be Yehowah to shepherd His servants - the children of Abraham and all those that convert or submit to the faith of the prophets, known as Judaism. Though I say, "biblical Judaism," not "Rabbinical Judaism."

2. "Mainstream Christianity" teaches that Jesus was born from a virgin, based on the gospels of Matthew and Luke. The Gospel of John, however, does not prescribe to that idea, because 6:42 and the whole seventh chapter of John deals with this whole issue by saying that he was conceived naturally by Joseph and Mary in Nazareth [John 6:42, 7,26b-27, 7:41,-42, 7:50-52] and that his very own brothers did not believe he was the moshiach [John 7:5]. Which is quite dumbfounding, because they would have also denied their mother's assertions of his conception when growing up and celebrating his birthday every year. Secondly, to stress what I just said, John 7 clearly points out that he was born in Nazareth, not Bethlehem. The doctrines of the Jewish prophets fits well in the narrative of John, because according to them the messiah must be the literal and physical son of King David by direct succession from his loins or physical seed - on the male side - like all children are when it come to a family name. On a side note to this topic, keep in mind that when the angels produced children of their own after marrying women [Gen 6:2 & 6:4], those children had no direct link to Adam. They were literally a new breed. When the angels did it again after the flood [6:4], those children had no direct link to Noah as well. So in the same way, if the God of Israel by mere power impregnated a virgin Israelite woman, David wouldn't have any involvement with his birth, thus negating the promise given to him and this so-called "virgin born" person would have no legitimate right to the throne of David. In truth, according to the prophets, he must be from David's actual seed like I said, for here are some proof verses:

I have made a covenant with my chosen, I have sworn unto David my servant,

Thy seed will I establish for ever, and build up thy throne to all generations. - Ps 89-3:4

My covenant will I not break, nor alter the thing that is gone out of my lips.

Once have I sworn by my holiness that I will not lie unto David.

His seed shall endure for ever, and his throne as the sun before me.

It shall be established for ever as the moon, and [as] a faithful witness in heaven. - Ps 89:34-37

Yehowah hath sworn [in] truth unto David; He will not turn from it; Of the fruit of thy body will

I set upon thy throne. - Ps 132:11

And it came to pass that night, that the word of Yehowah came unto Nathan, saying:

"Go and tell my servant David, 'Thus saith Yehowah, Shalt thou build me an house for me to dwell in?

Whereas I have not dwelt in [any] house since the time that I brought up the children of Israel

out of Egypt, even to this day, but have walked in a tent and in a tabernacle.

In all [the places] wherein I have walked with all the children of Israel spake I a word with any

of the tribes of Israel, whom I commanded to feed my people Israel, saying, Why build ye

not me an house of cedar?' Now therefore so shalt thou say unto my servant David, 'Thus saith

the Yehowah Tze-va-ot [The Eternal One among the hosts], I took thee from the sheepcote,

from following the sheep, to be ruler over My people, over Israel: And I was with thee

whithersoever thou wentest, and have cut off all thine enemies out of thy sight, and have made

thee a great name, like unto the name of the great [men] that [are] in the earth. Moreover I will

appoint a place for my people Israel, and will plant them, that they may dwell in a place of their

own, and move no more; neither shall the children of wickedness afflict them any more, as beforetime,

Even since the time that I commanded judges [to be] over My people Israel, and have caused

thee to rest from all thine enemies.' Furthermore, Yehowah telleth thee that He will make thee

an house. And when thy days be fulfilled, and thou shalt sleep with thy fathers, I will set up

thy seed after thee, which shall proceed out of thy bowels... ...and I will stablish the throne

of his kingdom for ever. - 2 Samuel 7:4-13.

Commentary: when Nathan says, "I will stablish the throne of his kingdom..." it is very clear that it is not

the kingdom of the God of heaven upon the earth, rather it is the kingdom belonging to one of David's many descendants. Secondly, it is clear that the descendant is not the God of Israel, as erroneous Trinitarians like to assume, because they do not know Jewish writings. Instead of reading what our holy texts actually say they prefer to listen to the false doctrines that their misinformed preachers and apologists spew out -because they think that our sole patron God, Yehowah, is some tri-being, thus they think Jesus is "God" on earth and then assume that the kingdom of the God of Heaven and the kingdom of the moshiach are the same thing. Another things I would like to point out is this, as Yehowah was in heaven when this prophecy came to Nathan, it is very clear that He will remain there when He establishes this great kingdom for David's descendant, just like He was when this prophecy went out.

Lastly, in opposition to the proponents of the "virgin birth," they have 'missed the mark' in regards to the two-fold reason behind the Covenant of Circumcision that was given to Abraham. The two reasons are these: Yehowah, the sole God of Abraham, promised him on oath that through his seed he would be patriarch to multitudes of people and to kings as well; And, secondly, from his very loins would come the great prophet - hero, called the moshiach, who would rule the whole earth in righteousness according to the laws of Yehowah, the Torah. Because of this oath, Yehowah commanded Abraham to circumcise everyone that would be born from him and all those that would dwell with him so that when Abraham and his descends would look upon their flesh they would be reminded that through Abraham's seed these things would be. Thus, the moshiach must be conceived in a natural fashion, being a direct descendant of this holy man and prophet named Abraham.

This is why the Gospel of John fits more into Judaic theology than does Matthew and Luke, because the author of John writes that Jesus was born in Nazareth, and born naturally from Joseph and Mary. Moreover, everyone knew that, as we can clearly see in John 1:45, 6:42 and chapter 7. Lastly, only Matthew quotes Isaiah 7:14 as 'proof' for the virgin birth, whereas Luke is silent about any prophecy of such things. Although theologians, apologists and preachers will glue the two accounts together; thus, applying Matthew's reference to Luke's narrative, even though they are completely different accounts and narratives. Yet, when you take a look at the context of the prophecy which Matthew extracts his reference from, this prophecy and this chapter of Isaiah has nothing to do with the messiah. Rather, it was a sign that came to pass during the reign of Ahaz, around 738 BCE. If the proponents of the virgin birth would simply do their homework and confirm whether or not a referenced passage is valid or not and not be so gullible to believe just in anything, they could see for themselves that the child E-ma-nu-el [Immanuel] had to be born before Rezin [King of Aram] and Pekah [King of Israel] were slain. This is because the prophecy states that before the child would discern the difference between right and wrong these two kings would be dead: "He will eat curds and honey until [GWT Bible & the Hebrew Masoretic Text] he knows how to reject evil and choose good. Yet, before the child shall know to refuse the evil, and choose the good, the land whose two kings thou hast a horrifying concern over shall [soon be lacking them]." I had to paraphrase to give the full thought behind the Hebrew word. This prophecy came to pass when the mighty King of Assyria invaded Aram and Hoshea murdered Pekah.

The last thing I would like to comment on is the FACT that the two virgin birth narratives are radically different from each other.

1. According to the Gospel of Matthew Joseph and Mary were residents of Bethlehem [Matt 2:11] and lived together after Joseph married Mary [Matt 1:24]. It was while they were residents of Bethlehem and being married Mary had Jesus in Bethlehem. Yet, according to Luke's account they were residents of Nazareth [Luke 3:4-5] and because of a "tax" they went to Bethlehem to be "registered." Likewise, according to Luke, they were not married when Mary had Jesus, but was only betrothed [Luke 2:5].

2. They both agree that Jesus was conceived while Herod was King of Judea [Matt 2:1 and Luke 1:5]. Yet, they apparently disagree when it comes to his birth. According to Matthew Herod was still alive when Jesus was born [Matt 2:1 & 2:16], but according to Luke 2:1 Herod was apparently dead buy the time Jesus was born, because of his lack of mentioning him again after Mary's nine month pregnancy, yet he mentioned a "Syrian," named Cyrenius.

3. Where did this family go after Jesus' birth?

Well, according to Luke's gospel, after 40 days passed from Jesus' birth [Luke 2:21-22 & Lev 12:2-4] they went back to their hometown of Nazareth [Luke 2:39]. Yet, according to Matthew they abandoned Israel altogether and headed off to Egypt [Matt 2:13] until Herod died in 4 BCE [Matt 2:15 & 2:19]. It was then they wanted to go back to Bethlehem [Matt 2:21-22] their hometown, but because of the threat of Archelaus they kept going to Nazareth instead [Matthew 2:22-24].

These are very stark differences, not just little typos from a scribe. They are completely different narratives. Likewise, don't forget what I said already, John's gospel totally counters these two gospels. Again, to show you one more stark difference between John's account with the two virgin birth narratives, it is this: According to Luke's account Jesus and John are cousins [Luke 1:36] and Elizabeth clearly knows that the child in Mary's womb is the moshiach [Luke 1:41-43]. Because of this one can logically assume that John would learn through Elizabeth his mom that his cousin was the moshiach. Yet, according to John the Baptist himself, according to gospel of John, he does not know him before his baptism [John 1:31 & 1:33], nor after his baptism - not by name that is, for this is why John the Baptist only refers to him as "'the lamb' of the God of Israel" and why John and Andrew never refer to him as Jesus, but only "Rabbi [John 1:38]." Another thing I would like to point out is that according to John, Jesus does not have a following when he is baptized by John, but that John and Andrew are his first disciples. This is significant, because if he is already known to be the legendary hero, prophet and future king - the messiah, John would see those crowds and people would be following him already. Yet, this is exactly what the two virgin birth narratives promote. According the two virgin birth narratives, many people know that he is the messiah right at his birth and in some cases even before his birth, like Elizabeth. Yet, according to John the prophet - the Baptist, the Gospel of John proclaims that the reason why John was sent to baptize folks was so that the moshiach would be pronounced at any given time during his prophetic time period. Thus, when Yehowah fell upon Jesus, like He did with David and many other righteous men in the past, Jesus turned into this "great" man at that very point.

Again John parallels Judaism, where Matthew and Luke do not!

3. Judaism teaches that some of the laws Moses and the other prophets received and taught shall last forever, while others shall only last to the day of judgment. Likewise, they taught that all men must do them for the Jewish concepts of 'salvation [Num 15:16-17, Ezekiel 18, Isa 56:6-7, Psalm 119:155 and Exodus 32:31-33 and...].' All four gospels teach this and that all men must do them [Matt 19:17, 23;1-3, 23:23, 24:20, John 15:10 and...]. Paul, however, of whom mainstream christianity follows taught that the law was literally eradicated [Eph 2:11-15; Col 2:14, "Blotting out the handwriting of ordinances;" and plenty of other passages from Paul's writings.].

4. Judaism doesn't teach "life after death," but only "life after the resurrection." Thus, according to Judaism when one dies, his spirit is asleep [yet without dreams, so one does not even know they exist] wherever his body lies. This will remain this way until the resurrection, at that point the God of Israel shall let the messiah judge all men [Daniel 12:2, Isa 38:18-19, Ps 6:5, Ecc 9:5 & 9:10, Job 3:13-19 & 14:7-12]. John's gospel teaches this [John 11:11-14 & 11:24]. The other gospels and Paul taught the opposite of Judaism [Matt 17:4 because of Moses being present; Luke 16:19-31, 23:43, 2 Cor 5:6-8 and...]

5.And.... The are many other things but let me finally move on...

So remember what I said, if you are going to pick up these Jewish / Hebrew writings, a collection of books to form a single book called the "Tanach [an acronym for T=Torah, N=Navim = the prophets, Ch=Chatovim = the writings]" in Hebrew, you are going to be given the viewpoint of that ancient or primitive theocratic culture. The people of this culture preached that they alone and all those that accepted their way of thinking and beliefs were only folks that knew the real truth. Whatever they taught that might "seem" legendary, must also be accepted, like: angels sleeping with women; people talking with animals; miracles; the Red Sea splitting and that a whole nation passed through on dry ground; that there will be a day of judgment by a holy agent for the God of Israel called the messiah.

Keep in mind with these viewpoints, this ancient theocratic society judged or deemed that Judaism is THEEEE very faith and only faith that was given by heaven itself, as we see HaShem talking with Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Moses, Samuel, David, Jeremiah and.... Therefore, we should only look to the words of the Prophets to see what they have said in the name of HaShem concerning who the true moshiach is, and what he was like, and Who

----------------[PAGE 1 WHEN PRINTED]----------------

the real God of Israel is. Judaism has NEVER taught that the moshiach is the God of Israel in any shape or fashion; instead, it teaches that he is the greatest of all those that observe the Torah, of all the prophets and all those that teach holiness and righteousness. Along with these things, Judaism teaches that he will be the world's finest historian, because authentic biblical Judaism teaches that he was there at the very beginning of creation, thus he would have the ability to tell or teach many wonderful things.

Furthermore, the doctrine of the trinity was invented by non-Jews around 110 CE/AD in or around the land that is known today as Turkey. Namely, people like Ignatius of Antioch, Irenius of Lyons, Tertullian of Carthage [who coined the term, "Trinity"], Eusebius of Caesarea and others. These non-Jews could not understand our Jewish scriptures, nor were they really inspired to read them after the original 11 apostles died off. This was because the people who believed in Jesus became highly tainted with falsehood, lies and deceiving doctrines. This is mainly because Paul taught the opposite of Jesus and his original apostles [Click here to see the proof] by saying that the Torah was done away with. And, because of the popularity and simpleness of Paul's message it won a great amount of converts that had no formal education of Judaism, which Judaism demands on all the children of Israel so that they all would be sound in the tenents of the faith. Yet, with popularity comes welding power and Pauline believers out numbered the Judaic believers like James [the brother of Jesus] and all those like James [See Acts 21:17-22]. The non-educated ones that believed in the simplistic Pauline way to 'life' invented all sorts of anti-Jewish beliefs and made those beliefs a part of their local congregations or "churches." Well, in the process of time these same types of people wrote their own writings or gospels and incorporated their anti-Jewish beliefs within the life and actions of Jesus, the great Orthodox Jewish man from Nazareth. Over time, these same Pauline believers that branched off into their own sect even took Paul's writings and manipulated them to reflect their non-Judaic worldview. For even though Paul was considered to be a heretic in his day, because of his anti-torah or anti-law teaching, he still maintained the theology of Judaism concerning the messiah which teaches the messiah is neither divine, nor eternal, but a made being and a part of this creation. Evidence of early manuscripts shows these manipulations that these "Pauline offshoots" did to negate what Paul taught, yet reflected their teachings. I will give a clear example in a moment. These "offshoots," because of their popularity and power, they became the dominate force of those times, they were the first 'Catholics,' which would mutate into far more vile and idolatrous Catholic movement you now see.

Most of the non-Israeli believers in Jesus did not end up like the people that Paul describes in his epistle 'to the Galatians." For according to this very epistle they turned their back on Paul and judged him as an apostate and started doing what the prophets of Israel said in places like Numbers 15 and Isaiah 56 which states that "you shall have one law for the native Israeli and the stranger." Thus, they started circumcising their children as the God of Israel commanded and keeping all of the Torah verses heeding the words of a mere man. For they judged Yehowah greater than Paul. Likewise, according to Deut 13, Paul fit the very description of a false preacher and prophet. For in Deut 13 it says, even if a man performs a miracle or gives a sign and it comes to pass, yet teaches against the law of Moses you are to ignore that preacher or prophet, for their are false prophets. So good for them. However, as I said, most non-Israelis did not end up this way. Because of this they never came to know what the tenents of Judaism are and so became worse and worse in their ignorance. Whereas, those that followed people like James kept the Torah all of the time.

For as we see in other places such as Acts 21; Matthew 5:17-20, 7:21-23, 19:17, 23:1-23, 24:20; and Zech 14; and John 14:21; and Revelation 12:17 and many other places that the torah is eternal and will NEVER be done away with.

This article will prove that Yehoshua is not 'God,' but only his Father is the 'Everlasting One' or 'the God of Israel.' It will even prove, by Jesus' own words that he never claimed that he is "God in the flesh" contrary to what the mainstream teaches. In fact, it will teach that he outright denied being "the God of Heaven." It will prove that the Trinity doctrine is entirely false and was in fact fabricated by the Pauline disciples that did not know Jewish tenents, who ended up being the early catholics, who influenced the rest of history as we [scholars, historians and the educated in these matters] know it.

This is not a "slam" by any means, BUT practically all 100% of so-called of modern "Christianity" is "Catholic" in nature. When I say, 'Catholic' I am speaking of the early catholics between 50 CE -250AD, not the modern "Roman Catholic Church," or those like them, like the "Greek Orthodox Church," the "Russian Orthodox Church," the Armenian Church and so forth. This is because practically every tenent they promote goes against the Teachings of the Israeli prophets found in the Jewish bible. Keep in mind that during the days of Jesus and his apostles ONLY the writings of the Hebrew prophets were considered "Scriptures."

Now to fellow Jews, this article proves that there is just one God without any triune nature, as you already correctly believe, unlike what so-called 'Christians' have been trying to convert you to throughout the ages. Nonetheless, the Tanach shows the "dualism" that you are missing, by writing off the pluralism of particular words for just mere monotheism, because of the lack of understanding the scriptures. When in fact, the Tanach teaches the moshiach's existence and works long before he ever becomes the son of David. The Tanach also proves that David himself prayed to him, long before Solomon was even born, in whose son he must also be.

What you will read is according to actual Biblical Judaism found in the actual book, not according to the sages that invented 'Rabbinical' Judaism within the last 2,000 years. These sages have actually led the children of Abraham away from their genuine ancestral faith for a long time, because of their oral traditions.

Please Read:

----------------[PAGE 2 WHEN PRINTED]----------------

ELOHIM (אלהים)

(PLURAL FORM OF ELOH,

THUS MEANING THERE IS MORE THAN ONE EL, BUT

NOT MORE THAN TWO (AND IT WILL BE PROVEN WITH THIS DOCUMENT),

THUS THE TRINITY DOCTRINE

IS DEMONIC, VILE AND FALSE)

ONLY ONE OF THOSE ELs, HOWEVER, IS 'GOD'

TWO RULERS

(THE KING OF PEACE, THE ANCIENT OF DAYS (DANIEL 7:13)

AND

YEHOSHUA, HIS SON, THE PRINCE OF PEACE (ISAIAH 9:6)

TWO SPIRITS THAT ARE HOLY

(THE LORD ("Yehowah - ", the Father) SAID TO MY LORD ("Adon", the son, yet David's lord),

SIT AT MY RIGHT HAND (Psalm 110))

TWO MAKERS OF THE UNIVERSE

"LET US (MORE THAN ONE EL) MAKE (Gen 1:26)"

TWO THRONES IN HEAVEN

"SIT AT MY RIGHT HAND (Psalm 110)"

WHAT IS THE MEANING OF SCRIPTURE WHEN IT TELLS US THAT WITHIN SOME VERSES THERE IS MORE THAN ONE LORD EXISTING? YET THERE ARE NEVER MORE THAN TWO OF THEM THAT ARE TALKED ABOUT? LIKEWISE, IT TELLS US THAT THESE TWO LORDS ARE TOTALLY SEPARATE FROM EACH OTHER AND ARE OBVIOUSLY NOT THE SAME PERSON, NOR RANK (AS PEOPLE ARE IN A MILITARY)???

1) ONE LORD IS THE FATHER, HE IS THE ONLY GOD IN EXISTENCE

2) THE SECOND lord IS THE FATHER’S SON, THE PRINCE OF THE UNIVERSE OR

PRINCE OF PEACE, NOT THE KING OF PEACE, THE

----------------[PAGE 3 WHEN PRINTED]----------------

MOSHIACH / MESSIAH / CHRIST, YEHOSHUA (JESUS) (even YEHOWAH II ). HE IS

NOT GOD, NOR A GOD, BUT WAS ACTUALLY BROUGHT INTO EXISTENCE LIKE THE ANGELS WERE YET BEING THE FIRSTBORN OF ALL CREATION OR ALL THAT CAME INTO BEING, HE WAS AND IS THE FIRST AND ALSO THE LAST THAT

THE FATHER HIMSELF MADE, ALL ELSE CAME THROUGH him.

JESUS IS THE MOST HIGHEST RANKING, THE MOST

POWERFUL SPIRIT THERE IS BELOW THE ONE AND ONLY GOD HIMSELF AND THAT IS "THE ANCIENT OF DAYS (DANIEL 7:13)"

Definitions:

El: אל - A Hebrew word commonly translated to English and other languages from the Jewish scriptures as “God”, or “god”, or “a god". However, this is not accurate, but, rather “El” according to the Jewish scripture simply means, “a high ranking spirit that has the ability to create, and can be in many places at the same time". This does not necessarily mean eternal, in the sense of "always was" or "always will." For an el can be made, (and/or created, thus having a beginning point or a birthday, per say.) So, if a particular spirit was not "always was", then it is obviously clear that this particular spirit is not the One True Ruler, or King of the Universe, or King of Peace, nor can ever be called a God. ("God", this word is commonly used as a name, which it is not, thus I use this word for what it really is, a mere title.) So, since there is no appropriate word in the English language and many other languages that would describe the meaning of this particular kind of spirit, it is better to leave it untranslated.

In the biblical Hebrew culture, and according to the Biblical religion, there is just One Being that "always was" or that has never had a beginning. This Being or Spirit is the "Ancient of Days." We see this name being used in Daniel 7:9. He is an "El" because He obviously can create and be at many places at the same time. This Everlasting El does however coincide with another "el" that does have a beginning point. This particular 'el' was actually made by the Ancient of Days Himself. He was made to have similar abilities to the Ancient One and so was made in His image and likeness. This el, Yehoshua or Jesus, was the first of all that has come into existence. When this occurred the Ancient of Days became a Father and the el that was made was His only begotten son. Now since this el that was made, Jesus or Yehoshua, is His son, it is clear that he is a prince and this is why we call him the "Prince of Peace", and not the "King of Peace."

As mentioned, because Yehoshua or this lesser el was the first of all that has come into existence, it is then clear he was here before the heavens and earth, the angels and the light of the first day and even the waters that were brought into existence, just moments before that light. Jesus is the first. So, because Yehoshua is an el, the Father let him bring everything that does, and did exist (some animals and plants are extinct), into existence. This is why when you read Genesis you will read, "In the beginning the El-s (Elohim) created likewise the heavens and likewise the earth." Thus when you finally come across Gen 1:26 "Let us make mankind as us" and they simply made two people, it should then be very clear to you that there are simply two els in all of existence. However, one El never had a beginning and is "the Everlasting", whereas the lesser el was made by the Everlasting El. So, when you read Genesis 2 you should be able to understand the relationship of the Father and the Son through the stories of Adam and Eve. For Adam was there first, then after awhile Eve came and was made in the image or form of Adam with similar abilities, basically a human. Yet, it is through Eve that mankind is given birth, just as it is through Yehoshua that all existence comes. As Eve is weaker than Adam, so is the made el weaker than the El that never had a beginning. Likewise, as Eve must submit to her husband, so must the son submit to his Father, or the prince to the King that has all authority.

----------------[PAGE 4 WHEN PRINTED]----------------

-im: ים- this is a suffix that indicates the pluralism regarding things, people and places, and this is the pronunciation of its Hebrew dialect. And so some words are written with this ending when translated from Hebrew to English when there is no fitting word in the English language to indicate the same thing in the English world. Thus it is the same as the English -s to designate something as being plural or more than one. As: Cherub/Cherubim (Ezekiel 10:1) or Seraph/Seraphim (Isaiah 6:6).

Now regarding the word: “Elohim אלהים”, this is the plural form of Eloh (1 Kings 18:36 to those that have access to a Hebrew bible), thus meaning there is more than one Eloh. If you do not have the original Scriptures regarding 1 Kings 18:36 the translated version might just read “God of Abraham.” Now a shorter version of “Eloh” is just plain “El”.

This is what the Scriptures teach:

You must assert,(believe and teach), that only two el-s (“Elohim אלהים” is plural for Eloh (or El in its shorter version)), or Lords, or high-ranking SPIRITS are existing. For this is what the scriptures are telling us. It tells us that these two el-s are totally separate from each other, as you are separate from your neighbor, in every way. However, one El, (the Father) is greater than the other el, (the son, Jesus), because the one El (the Father) made the other, and when He made him, He did not give him equal power, for that is one thing the only God cannot do, because He is eternal where all He makes or can make has a beginning point and those things or individuals would never know the mind of Yehowah.. For it is written, "For He 'has put everything under his feet.' Now when it says that 'everything' has been put under him, it is clear that this does not include God Himself, Who put everything under Christ. When He has done this, then the Son himself will be made subject to Him Who put everything under him, so that God may be all in all (1 Corinthians 15:27-28)". This is the same regarding Jesus’ knowledge as well, for it is written, "No one knows about that day or hour, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father (Matthew 24:36)," this also makes it clear that the legend "Jesus is in all places at the same time" is debunked. That is, as far as the past and the future are concerned. For if this were the case he would know the exact day and hour he was returning. However, to prove that he can be in/at all places and people at the same time, (though he is not and will not be, because he does not dwell in evil people or non-believers), in the present only let's look at scripture. It is written, "If anyone loves me, he will obey my teaching. My Father will love him, and we will come to him and make our home with him [thus proving this, if there is more than one disciple in the world] (John 14:23)", and "For where two or three come together in my name, there am I with them [thus proving it again, if there should be more than one group praying at the same time in the world] (Matthew 18:20)". However, these two verses only pertain to his glorified state, not his manhood state, because when it was time for him to become a man, the Father annulled his glory and his power and 'el' abilities or qualities, thus he was no longer an 'el' or the semi-all knowing and semi-omnipresent spirit, for He caused him to become a man, for it is written, "You sent me into the world (John 17:18)". And also, "I am not here on my own, but He who sent me (John 7:28)," and "You caused him to be less rank than the heavenly beings (Psalm 8:5)," "You heard me say, 'I am going away and I am coming back to you.' If you loved me, you would be glad that I am going to the Father, for the Father is greater than I," and so because of this statement alone he says, "Unless I go away, the counselor (that counselor being he himself in his glorified state) will not come to you" and so he says, "you know him, for he

----------------[PAGE 5 WHEN PRINTED]----------------

now lives with you and shall be in you. So I will not leave you as orphans; I will return to you." For the scriptures are clear by stating that as long as he is a man he cannot be in all places at the same time, and because of this he can not also dwell in mankind, and if he is not dwelling in them neither is the Father. Now understand this: if a demon can enter a man and dwell in them how much easier can an 'el' dwell in you? So if the 'most high' of all creation dwells in you and the Eternal EL can dwell in the 'most high,' since the 'most high' is made, then it is clear that if Jesus dwells in you, then also his God, the only God, the God of Israel.

However, whether the Father and Yehoshua dwell in you, or not, this has nothing to do with one’s salvation. For salvation is based solely on if you accept that Jesus is the only begotten son, ("For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life, (John 3:16)). However this verse is only in the context if you obey him while obviously believing in him, not just by simply believing in him as pagan preachers say. Yehoshua/Jesus himself is the one that made the heavens and the earth and all that is in them, (“Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made (John 1:3)” and “For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him (Colossians 1:16)). He was then dis-ranked to the status of a man, ("You caused him to be dis-ranked below the heavenly beings" (Psalm 8:5)), by the awesome power of the Father. He was sent by the Father, slain and was resurrected on the third day by the same Father, and then ascended into heaven and now sits at the right hand of the Father on his own throne as the Prince of the Universe, ("The LORD (Yehowah) said unto my lord (adon), Sit thou at My right hand, until I make thine enemies thy footstool" (Psalm 110:1)), and he shall come again to judge the living, and those that died after he resurrects them. You must also be baptized, ("Whoever believes and is baptized will be saved" (Mark 16:16)). You also must obey his commands that he spoke unto Moses at Mt. Sinai, and to his prophets and that he himself gave while on earth, and through his apostles and prophets of today. You must also obey the personal commands that he gives us ("Now a man came up to Jesus and asked, "Teacher, what good thing must I do to get eternal life?" “If you want to enter life, obey the commandments (Matthew 19:16-17)"). He also did this with Jonah when he called him to go and preach a message of repentance and obedience in Nineveh. All of that which Jesus says is simply relayed to us by his God, Yehowah, the Only God, for he only speaks of what he hears, ("These words you hear are not my own; they belong to the Father who sent me (John 14:24)”).

Therefore, regarding the scriptures pertaining to him regaining his power and glory and the Father causing him to be an 'el' again, the scripture says, "And now, Father, glorify me in Your Presence with the glory I had with You before the world began (John 17:5)," and also, "In my vision at night I looked, and there before me was one like a son of man (Yehoshua being prophesied about by Daniel where Acts leaves off), coming with the clouds of heaven. He approached the Ancient of Days and was led into His presence. He was given authority, glory and sovereign power (thus indicating he lacked it before this moment, (but not before he was in the womb of Mary, as the previous verse mentions) (Daniel 7:13-14))" and, "You crowned him with glory and honor (Psalm 8:5)". The original statement also makes it clear that he does not know the mind of God. This is regarding the time of his own coming which he does not know, but only the Father knows, (Matthew 24:36). Thus, the Most High's knowledge is obviously limited.

Saying that the Most High's knowledge is limited, gives rise to the doctrine that he can only know all knowledge pertaining to what is going on in the present. He also knows what went on in the past, but he can possibly forget what he learned, for it is written, "And אלהים remembered Noah and all the wild animals and the livestock that were with him (Genesis 8:1)".Moreover, Revelation 20:12 says, "The dead were judged according to what they

----------------[PAGE 6 WHEN PRINTED]----------------

had done as recorded in the books". Also, he knew the thoughts of all before he became a man and he now knows the thoughts of all. But, he does not know the thoughts of He who is in greater rank than himself, and no one is this, but the Father only. Therefore, what Yehoshua does know of the future has been told to him by the Father.

When he was a man, he no longer knew the thoughts of men. Nor did he know the thoughts of any spirit that was less in rank than he, (such as an angel, cherub, etc.), before the Father caused him to be a man. When he did know the thoughts of men, while he himself was a man, it was because they were revealed to him by the Father; as so it was with the prophets of the past and present. He, (the Father), likewise did not give him sustaining power, or rule, so that he can do whatever he desires without the fear of being condemned himself. For he is not the ultimate Being and Judge, (for Jesus is the Father's greatest servant). Thus, he is similar to us men in that, if we do not obey the son, whom will only speak of what he hears from the Father, we will be condemned. Thus, he is no greater than us men in that regard, for he says this concerning himself, "just as I have obeyed my Father's commands and so remain in His love (John 15:10)", and what I just mentioned regarding him, "the Son himself will be made subject to Him". However, the Son has always been subject to Him, since the day he was made. This means he too can be condemned to hell if he falls or turns away from these commands, and this statement alone tells us he is not the law giver. We gather this,even though in John 8:58 he claims to be the very one to be giving the Law to Moses on Mt. Sinai, for he says, "Verily, verily, I say to you, before Abraham was, I AM." This is referring to Exodus 3:13-14, when Moses asks the lord his name, in case his brothers should ask who is sending him to lead the Israelites out of Egypt. The response is, "I AM THAT I AM: and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I AM hath sent me unto you," thus also saying though he gave the law, even at Sinai and greatly enforced it and still does, he claims he is not the one that made it, but that he is just a mere messenger of the One that is the Judge.

The story in chapter two of Genesis is a hidden truth into what actually occurred during the days of eternity, before the first part of creation was ever started. Jesus was the first of all His works, in fact he also is the only, and thus, being the last of what His hands have made. This is what is meant when he says, "I am the First and the Last and the Firstborn of all creation and that has been made (in a paraphrase form)," for it is written, "he is the likeness of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. However, by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him. He is before all things and in him all things hold together (Colossians 1:15-17, this by the way is the only thing I accept from Paul, which this of all things he should get right since he was a Pharisee)." Chapter 2 of Genesis says this in a paraphrase form, "He made the man from the dust of the ground, then later, after he named all the animals, he then caused the man to go into a deep sleep in which he took a rib from his side and formed a woman out of it. Thus, making her from him and because of this they were the same essence and flesh and she was made in the image of the man." And so he, as I mentioned above, was made in "the image of the invisible God". Proverbs 8 expounds on this by saying, "The LORD made me as the first of His works, before His deeds of old; I was made during eternity, before the beginning, before the world began. When there were no oceans, I was given existence, when there were no springs abounding with water; before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given existence, before He made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world." So, as Eve was made (not created), so the Son was made, not created and so, Proverbs 8 proves that he was never eternal, and that he was made from His Essence and Spirit, as Eve was from Adam’s own flesh. He only made two humans, male and female and the lesser came from the essence of the original, and the lesser was made in the image of the original. These two were given the authority to govern all in this realm as those TWO have authority over their realm and all realms; so we humans are analogous to them. This is the meaning of Genesis Chapters 1

----------------[PAGE 7 WHEN PRINTED]----------------

and 2 when it says, "Let US make mankind as US". And what is mankind? Only a male and female, two individuals (not three to go against the pagan Trinitarians and not just one), yet these two were of the same essence.

These two spirits (Yehowah and the Most High (Jesus) interact with each other to glorify each other. And not a single man can know either of them unless they act together, for it is written: "no one knows the Father except the Son and those to whom the Son chooses to reveal Him (Matthew 11:27)." The same goes for the other, "No one knows the Son except the Father [and] no one can come to me unless the Father Who sent me draws him (John 6:44, Matthew 11:27)". In Matthew 16, we see the Father revealing Jesus, "When Jesus came to the region of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples, 'Who do people say the Son of Man is?' They replied, 'Some say John the Baptist; others say Elijah; and still others, Jeremiah or one of the prophets.' 'But what about you?' he asked. 'Who do you say I am?' Simon Peter answered, 'You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.' Jesus replied, 'Blessed are you, Simon Peter son of Jonah, for this was not revealed to you by man, but by my Father in heaven (Matthew 16:13-17).'" The story of Joseph and Pharaoh is also an allegory into what was going to occur with the Son of Man in the future, and it also states that there are only two individuals involved. One is greater than the other, yet all must honor the other (the Son) to have favor from the greater, for it is written, "he who honors me, honors the One who sent me." Also, as mentioned earlier about Christ, the same is true concerning this story. The one (Joseph) will be made subject to the one (Pharaoh) who put everything under him, for it says, "You shall be in charge of my palace, and all my people are to submit to your orders. Only with respect to the throne will I be greater than you (Genesis 41:40)". Thus, scripture is clear in saying that there are only two Individuals, and no more and no less than that. Therefore, he who believes that there is just one El in existence transgresses. And also, he who believes in one God according to pagan Trinitarians, thus meaning is 'the Father, Son and Spirit' also transgresses and commits idolatry for such a God does not exist, but that is a false doctrine which was turned into creed at the Nicene Council in 325 AD. The Father and His son are separate Beings, and one, (the Son) must obey the Other, (the Father) or he himself will be judged like any other sinner, whether angel or human; yet all spirits, humans and all of creation is subject to him. This is because he is a Prince and so, a lord and yet all are made by him. Moreover, mankind is not able to be honored, loved and given salvation by the Father unless we honor and obey this Prince, His son. The son will not speak willfully on his own, thus the words he speaks are messages from the Father. This is why he says, "If you obey me, you (automatically) obey my Father for the words that I speak are not my own, but the Father's, whom has sent me." Make no mistake about it, when the scriptures and he himself states that he and the Father are one, he is stating that they are in accordance with each other, or allied with each other. Understand this, the scripture also states, "I pray also for those who will believe in me through their (my disciples) message, that all of them may be one - that they may be one as we are one - and brought to complete unity (John 17:20-23)". Thus as we humans are not the same person, they to are separate people or different el-s. Remember that Jesus is a far cry from Yehowah, because Jesus was made, thus he very limited, even though no one can compare to him that has come into being.

What more shall I say about this? Abraham was given a promise that through his firstborn son, Isaac, he would become the parent of many nations, and that his offspring would be like the stars in the sky for multitude. Yet while Isaac was still a boy and not yet married, nor did he yet have children of his own, Abraham was commanded to sacrifice him, his firstborn son. Yet, if he were to do this, how would He fulfill his promise to him, that through Isaac, Abraham would become this mighty parent? So, as he was told to do, Abraham went up to Mount Moriah and there was going to sacrifice his promised son, the very one that would bring about Abraham's glory. However, when Abraham left his two servants, he told them, "Stay here with the donkey while I and the boy go over there. We will worship and then we will come back to you (Genesis 22:5)." Thus, indicating that Abraham considered

----------------[PAGE 8 WHEN PRINTED]----------------

what was promised to him and understood that He would not lie to him. Therefore, he understood He would either intervene, as stated when he spoke words of faith again, "Isaac spoke up and said to his father Abraham, "Father?" "Yes, my son?" Abraham replied. "The fire and the wood are here," Isaac said, "but where is the lamb for the burnt offering?" Abraham answered, "God Himself will provide the lamb." Or, that He would simply resurrect him from the dead. Yet, regardless of the case Abraham put his trust in the One who gave the promise in order to fulfill it. This story is also a great allegory to what was going to occur in the future concerning the Father (the eternal El) and a son (the made el)

Do you see that there are only two individuals mentioned in this story? Also, this is the allegory concerning them: The Father would take His only Son, the promised Son, the one that would sit on the throne of David, even after being promised that he would ascend to heaven itself and be given back his glory that he had with Him before He caused him to become a man. As I mentioned earlier, he would sit at the right hand of the Father as a prince, for he is just a mere son, and if he were to sit at His right side then he will be granted a chair and that chair is his throne. It is written by David, "The Lord said to my lord, "Sit at My right hand until I make your enemies a footstool for your feet (Psalm 110:1)," and "To him that overcomes, I will give the right to sit with me on my throne, just as I overcome and sat down with my Father on his throne (Rev 3:21)," then in due time he would come to earth again, and take the same position as David in Jerusalem, and so sit on the throne of Israel. He would also fulfill many other promises and prophecies which He would not be able to fulfill if Yehoshua were to be left in the grave and never to live again after his death. Therefore, if this were the case as well, not even a single human could be saved after that point if He would not resurrect him, for he himself said, "no one can come to the Father unless he go through me." There are many other verses in the scripture that also give us more truths regarding this, that there are only two els existing, not more or less and they are definitely not equal in power, or knowledge. Nature also testifies to this, this is the reason They set up nature in this manner, so that mankind has no excuse for not knowing the truth. For example, there are no more, and no less than two that keeps a single species or 'kind' in existence. For there is just a male and a female regarding all species, as in mankind, animals, birds, fish, trees, plants, bugs, insects and even flowers. You can even look to the hosts of the expanse which they made for this truth, for they only made two great luminaries. The greater one to rule the day and the lesser to rule the night. But to go deeper in truth the moon has no light in itself it only reflects it. This is like Jesus and the Father for Jesus said, "the words that I speak are not my own, but the Father's." Other verses also testify to this truth, by simply mentioning only two individuals exist, such as: "The sayings of Agur son of Jakeh - an oracle: This man declared to Ithiel, to Ithiel and to Ucal: I am the most ignorant of men: I do not have a man's understanding. I have not learned wisdom, nor have I knowledge of the holy ONES. Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is His name, and the name of His son? Tell me if you know (Proverbs 30:1-4)!" and "These are the words of him who holds the seven spirits of God (the 7 archangels) - I have not found your deeds complete in the sight of my God (Rev 3:1-2)," "I am coming soon - to him who overcomes I will make a pillar in the temple of my God. Never again will he leave it. I will write on him the name of my God - and I will also write on him my new name (Rev 3:11-12)," and many more speak of only two els. When however the son was disglorified so that the Father caused him to be a man, the Father was the only "EL" and "SPIRIT" in existence at that time. This was until the Father glorified him with the glory he had before the world existed. Thus two el-s are existing, this is the reason the word, "Elohim," is used and is stated numerous times in scripture, as in Gen 1:1, "During the inauguration the (Elohim) created the heavens and the earth." Concerning these two els however, each of them has their own body as I have basically stated, by saying they are separate from each other, as Adam and Eve are. They have their own separate thrones and because they have heavenly bodies this is the reason the angels and the heavenly beings can see them. Also, some of the prophets such as Daniel, Ezekiel, Moses and Isaiah, and of course, likewise Adam when one of them was walking in the garden in the cool of the

----------------[PAGE 9 WHEN PRINTED]----------------

day, which was Yehoshua/Jesus. But, they can exist in all places as I have mentioned, so when the scripture mentions, "the Spirit," the Spirit is not a third Individual, nor a part of some Trinity as many have come to believe, but rather they are not simply limited to those bodies or forms. One reason for having these forms is so that the angels and the heavenly hosts can present themselves to them as during the time of Job's life, or in the days of king Ahab in 1 Kings 22:19-22. Thus, each of them has a central body form in which all spirits are able to see them and it is in the likeness of these forms that we men were made in. It is written, "Above the expanse over their (the cherubim) heads was what looked like a throne of sapphire, and high above on the throne was a figure like of a man (Ezekiel 1:26)," yet they can dwell everywhere and the part which is not of this central body form is pure spirit, thus saying there are two SPIRITS. So now you should be able to understand what Jesus was talking about when he said, "The counselor shall not come unless I go away and you know him for he now dwells with you, and will be in you, and so my Father and I (just two individuals here) will make our dwelling in you." For the 'SPIRIT (that is Jesus in spirit form)' could not come until he left, because Jesus was (before he became a man) and is now, this particular 'spirit' in which he was talking about. And, as long as he was not yet glorified to his former state he could not be in all places as the same time, nor exist in a single person at that time. But, when scriptures talk about that the 'Spirit' descended like a dove and rested on Jesus after John baptized him, this is talking about the Father, for only one Spirit was in existence at that time, because Jesus was disglorified and not in his former state yet. This is the reason Jesus only mentions himself and the Father by saying, "I and the Father are one." Thus when you read the word, "SPIRIT" you must understand whom the scriptures are talking about, whether it is talking about the Father, or the Son, and so to determine this you have to look at when the story is taking place and what the circumstances it is written in. So to help you out a bit in this, if the story is taking place between Jesus's conception to the moment of his glorification it is usually talking about the Father. But, for statements like, "I will grant you another counselor, the Spirit of Truth," the scriptures are now talking about Jesus. Moreover, when Jesus was in the synagogue and he read from the scroll of Isaiah and the prophet wrote, "The Spirit of the Lord is upon me...," this is now talking about the Father. Before time and the making of the Son, the Father was not yet a Father, so He stood alone, He never had a beginning as the Son has and He shall never have a end, He endures forever. He is the Blessed One, the Everlasting. Yet eventually He thought of a great plan to make a being or individual similar to Himself and to have this being or person make and create all, so during eternity while He was still alone He took on a form similar to that of a man, which I mentioned above. This is His central body form and from this form He took a piece from it and made the Son. Thus saying, "As in heaven so on earth." Therefore, there are two els and one of these els, (the Father) is the only Eternal God and the other el is the Son, the Moshiach, he was made like Him, he is the firstborn of all creation.

Now after all of this, you must not be unconcerned regarding this truth, by saying what does it matter just as long as I believe in the Son and that he died for my sins? Because the Trinity does not exist, nor a Triune natured, nor Triune personality God or One that has three different ministries, because that such god is different from the truth. If you believe this false trinity doctrine, you will be committing idolatry and you shall go to hell for this belief. Also, you must not assert there are three Gods, for this would be a violation of the first command of the ten commandments by having more than one God, whom is the Father alone.

Now to add to this, after I was sending this document to others, I was somehow led to an encyclopedia about something and I came across a group of people that lived during the time and before the Nicene Council took place. They were the Arians of the Arianism beliefs, which deny that Jesus is the God of Israel, which is true. They somewhat taught the ways of Judaism and of the New Testament accurately where this is what they said, “Arius said that God is unbegotton and without beginning, the Son however is begotten and so therefore cannot be God, but rather was made and so exists by the will of the Father as like any other being and creature and is held

----------------[PAGE 10 WHEN PRINTED]----------------

accountable as well for his actions as are the angels, which of some fell away from following the Father and so can also fall away if he so chooses.” Arius however was not an authority figure of the so called "Holy Roman Empire" and so was labeled as a heretic. This group of people was named Arians in modern times by historians, so they can label this group of people that believed in this particular way. Arius did not invent the teaching, but preached it and really advocated it and so was condemned directly because of it. Modern historians do not know any others by name that took this faith, so the historians named it after Arius, but they can agree there were thousands of such believers during and before Arius.

For this is what the Nicene Creed says in part, I will not mention all of it, since it is so evil and wrong. I will quote just a little to show where they foul up in their doctrine that casts most non-Jewish believers in Yehoshua (Jesus) on a highway to hell for causing them to believe a lie and in a non-existing God. The Nicene Council took place because of Arius or because of people as him. Here is the creed:

IN PART, THE NICENE CREED:

We believe in one God, (correct verse)

the Father, the Almighty, (correct verse)

maker of heaven and earth, (correct verse)

of all that is, seen and unseen. (correct verse)

We believe in one Lord, Jesus Christ, (correct verse)

the only Son of God, (correct verse)

eternally begotten of the Father, (correct as in to say, begotton during eternity)

God from God, light from light, (WRONG DOCTRINE, for he is not a god/God)

true God from true God, (WRONG DOCTRINE, for he is not a god/God)

begotten, not made,...... (WRONG, begotton yes, but he was made for that is what

begotten means)

For Paul says (not that I like Paul, but he was a Pharisee nonetheless, so he does know this truth), "He is the firstborn of ALL creation" thus saying, if he is the first of all creation, there was nothing around before he was made, thus he is the first. Also, if he is the first regarding creation, this also includes he himself has a beginning point as the spirits and things that came after him, thus it is impossible for him to be the eternal God. Thus this Nicene Creed is pagan, wicked, and not right!!!!

Having said all of this, you must believe that there is just one God and this is strictly the Father. He has a son and because he is a son, he is also a Prince as stated, he is the "Prince of Peace" and so this is why he sits at the right hand of the King, the Only God, the Father. And because he is a Prince, the Father gave him the power of the kingdom of heaven and the power to resurrect the dead in due time and because he is a Prince, this makes him also a lord, so the Scriptures stands true that states, "The Lord said to my lord sit at My right hand." And this lord will soon come and humble all the lords of the earth so that he will be called "Lord of lords."

On a further note, this coming information will really let the light of the Tanach shine forth. I hear and read what people say to me, "What about Isaiah 9:6?" Yeah, What about it? The truth of the matter is that if you have the

King James Version

New International Version

The Living Bible Version

----------------[PAGE 11 WHEN PRINTED]----------------

The American Standard Version

The Jerusalem Bible Version

and so on..........

all of these versions have been translated by non-Jewish people that believe in the doctrine of the Trinity!!!! Thus when they translated Isaiah 9:6 they made it to read that the Father and the prince of peace are and is the same God, which is blasphemy. The following quotes are taken from the King James Version and the New International Version so you can see what I am talking about:

KJV

For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given:

and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his* name shall be called Wonderful, Counselor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace.

*("his," this word is in a single form thus making it seem that this awful and false rendering of the scriptures, by none other than Trinitarians, is true. In that "The Everlasting Father" and the "Prince of Peace" are the same person.)

The truth of the matter, however, is that "The Everlasting Father" does not exist in this Isaiah text, in Hebrew that is. For there are not three words there. Rather, the Isaiah text says that "his name shall be called, "Aviad."" Well, this word is a single word, and it is talking about the name of the messiah. Let me translate this for you."Aviad" is in its Hebrew form. I will help you translate this name by using the name, Abraham, in Hebrew. Abraham is said like this in Hebrew:: Av-ra-ham. The "Av-" in Avraham means "Father" and the "-raham" of Avraham means "to many nations or peoples." Thus, when we come to Isaiah 9:6, we see the name, not words, "Aviad," it does not have words that read "The Everlasting Father." For the "-i-" in Aviad means, "my." Thus so far it would read, "My Father......" and the '-ad' in the name "Aviad" means "eternal." Thus this particular name of the messiah paints a whole entirely different picture than what is taught in the pagan Trinitarian churches. Why? Because his very name tells that he is not eternal, but rather his Father is eternal for "his name shall be called Aviad (My Father is Eternal).

Its just like the name of Joshua, that is also the Messiah's name, which means "Yehowah is salvation," not "I am salvation."

Furthermore, they translated "mighty God" from the Hebrew words, "el gibor." As I said regarding the word, "el" they should not translate it, because they do not know the REAL meaning of it. So, if they believe in a Trinity doctrine they will always translate it as "God." However we know that an "el" does not necessarily mean it is talking about the One True & Only God, whom is the Father, or the Ancient of Days. For as we now know there is more than one el, and the only other el in existence is the son who was made (as any other's son) or the Prince that sits at the side of the Great and Awesome King.

Thank you and shalom

I hope you will convert from all wickedness lest you want to go to hell.

___________________________________________________________________________________

I actually have more writings about this subject throughout the entire website. This is because Trinitarians write to me pretty regularly with questions regarding the messiah or the

----------------[PAGE 12 WHEN PRINTED]----------------

trinity; and so, they want me to explain things to them. So, I show them through the writings of the prophets and of the apostles who the messiah really is; and therefore, prove that he is not 'God,' nor 'God in the flesh.' In fact, we Jews - literally - have NEVER taught, nor teach, that the messiah is the God of Israel, nor is he divine; though, he is far greater than any angelic host (and he existed before them, whom he made), for he is the very son of the God of Israel. Just saying the words, 'son of...' should tell one enough that he is NOT the God of Israel. Moreover, to see these other references I have throughout this site, please read the following links below, and once again, thank you.

LINKS

1. For detailed and shocking proofs why Yehoshua/Jesus is not the God of Israel, CLICK HERE

2. A genuine look into John 1 from the perspective of John's ancestral faith and the

very religion that he practiced and taught all the days of his life; that religion being

Judaism. John plainly tells us that Jesus is not "God" at all, but that he is of a class

of spirits known as els, like cherubim are their own class and seraphim are their own

class as well. There are only two els in existence, the God of Israel and the son that

He brought into being during the days of eternity, CLICK HERE

3. Basic truths of Judaism and of the prophets within that faith; a basic summary of

"heshallgovern.com," CLICK HERE

and........

FRONT PAGE

___________________________________________________________________________________

This section of this webpage is strictly for those searching by the means of a search engine, since Google picks up key words or "meta tags" of particular websites concerning the topic or subject asked. Below are some answers to questions that others asked in order to catch them in the fishing net of heshallgovern.com

1. Proving Jesus is God - I scholarly look into the gospels shows that the

gospels do not support that Jesus is the God of Israel in the flesh, once

understanding the genuine texts and the culture of Judaism instead of

Trinitarian translations.

2. Is Jesus God? No!! A scholarly look into the gospels prove that Jesus is

not, nor ever claimed to be the God of Israel, but HIS personal son and child.

3. Is the trinity in the Bible? No!!! In the original texts - NO. But in the

texts that have been tampered with, yes it can be proven [Click here to see].

4. Commentary on John 1:14. A deep look into the truth behind this verse and how

it has become tainted because of Trinitarians vs. understanding it through the

eyes of Judaism - the faith and culture of Jesus and Israel [CLICK HERE].

5. Commentary on John 1:1. A deep look into the truth behind this verse and how

it has become tainted because of Trinitarians vs. understanding it through the

eyes of Judaism - the faith and culture of Jesus and Israel [CLICK HERE].

6. See the facts why Jesus is not God [Click here]

7. The Jewish messiah is not the God of Israel, but his greatest servant.

8. Who is the Jewish messiah? Find out here.

9. What is a messiah? Find out here.

10. Is Jesus the messiah? read this Jewish review on the man named Jesus

11. What does Elohim mean? Click here to find out!

12. Monotheism - Please click here to find out more

13. What does Judaism teach? Please click here

14. What is monotheism? Please click here

15. What is Elohim? Please click here

16. Understanding Elohim - please click here

17. Is the Trinity in the Bible? No - Click here to see why

18. Proving the trinity? - Click here to see why you can't

19. Is Jesus God? No!! Click here to see why

20. Second person of the Godhead? Click here to see why this is false!!

21. Explaining the trinity - please click here for more

22. scriptural proofs for the trinity - please click here

23. Why Jesus is God - please click here to see why he is not!!

24. Why Jews don't believe in Jesus.