I want to start out this long article by first setting up a premise for one's understanding of all Judaic truth concerning the God "of Israel" and the foretold moshiach "of Israel."

The religion that the Biblical prophets, the righteous Judean kings, the holy Levitical priests, and the holy people of Israel practiced was a faith called Judaism. With that being said, when the Judaic prophets prophecied about the "Jewish" messiah, they mentioned that he would be one of their own, a fellow countryman - an Israelite, and one who would practice the same religion and faith as them; he would promote no other faith or belief system. He would, in fact, promote Judaism like no other, being the best of all Judaic practitioners. So, in order for the student or the casual reader /  learner to understand who the real "Jewish" messiah is or what he must be like, he/she must know or be acquainted with some basic fundamental truths regarding Judaism. If one sees the "Jewish" messiah apart from, or not associated with Judaism; or apart from practicing and promoting nothing but Judaism (his ancestral religion) or from the Mosaic Law and the laws of the other prophets, that same person will view a skewed and very tainted version of him and they would be highly misinformed. To put it in another way, if the prophets of Israel who foretold about the "Jewish" messiah all practiced Judaism and kept all of the Torah [the Mosaic Law,] then their messiah would also do the same. 

This long article will delve into many topics concerning Judaism, the faith of the prophets of Israel. It will show and prove that the prophets never proclaimed, taught, acknowledged, nor prophecied that their coming moshiach would be "God in the flesh," like what so-called mainstream "Christianity" says about their messiah. The messiah of mainstream Christianity is a far different messiah than the one described by the prophets of Israel in their holy writings.

The prophets of Israel only viewed their messiah as the God of Israel's greatest servant and prophet. So great would this person be that their God said He would bless this "messiah" with the power and ability to rule as a king over the whole earth and that his reign, as a king, would literally have no end. Thus, his kingdom would be an everlasting kingdom. The prophets taught that he would promote the ways of authentic biblical Judaism like no other; teaching its ways of righteousness, holiness, and justice.

To stress this fact more, let me repeat myself once again, if one speaks of the messiah apart from Judaism, or from his Jewish heritage, or from promoting and practicing all of the laws of the prophets, these same people are misrepresenting the true "Jewish" moshiach. In fact, the "Jewish" messiah is the crown jewel of all those that practice the Torah and those that call sinners to follow the Torah; thus, turning sinners from their wicked lifestyle, habits and thoughts to a life of righteous deeds and truthful beliefs and doctrines.

This is the fundamental premise to the real "Jewish" messiah. I hope I was very clear, for without this correct premise, one does not know, nor can he know the real "Jewish" messiah from a false messiah.

On the other hand, so-called "Christianity" sees Jesus through the teachings of Paul and not through Jesus' own teachings, which are far different from each other. Because of Paul's teachings, "mainstream Christians" think and believe that Jesus came and eradicated the Jewish laws, customs and practices upon his death on the cross [Eph 2:11-15 & Col 1:14]. But, like I said, this is according to the teachings of Paul, not according to the teachings of Jesus himself. According to Jesus, the Torah would never be eradicated [Matt 5:17-20] and  in order for anyone to enter into life, one must keep all of the commandments; thus, making "salvation" very conditional upon one's conduct [Matt 23:1-3; Matt 23:23; Matt 19:16-17]. This boldly goes against Paul's invented "grace" theology where he wrote one is "saved by faith" alone and not by observing the Torah ['Gal' 2:16]. To speak of James, the very blood brother of Jesus,  for a moment, not even he taught this 'grace' idea, rather this is what he wrote, "by works a man is justified, and not by faith only." Therefore, James' teachings parallel Jesus' teachings and the teachings of the prophets. For according to the prophets, a person is righteous only if he acts in the way the Torah dictates, not simply because a person might pray a lot or merely believe in certain doctrines correctly. In fact, Samuel the prophet griped at King Saul for not obeying the voice of HaShem, even though King Saul was praising HaShem and giving Him sacrifices and believed in Him correctly. For this is what Samuel says to him in 1 Samuel 15:22-23, "And Samuel said, Hath YHWH [as great] delight in burnt offerings and sacrifices, as in obeying the voice of YHWH? Behold, to obey [is] better than sacrifice, [and] to hearken than the fat of rams. For rebellion [is as] the sin of witchcraft, and stubbornness [is as] iniquity and idolatry. Because thou hast rejected the word of YHWH, He hath also rejected thee from [being] king."

In his day, Paul was not seen as a genuine apostle by the majority of the Jewish believers, but mostly by Gentiles that knew very little about the teachings and tenents of Judaism. These same Gentiles would also remain ignorant - in most part - to the things of Judaism as long as they remained under Paul's teaching, because Paul taught against the keeping of the Torah. Thus, there really was very little need to read the torah/Law. Paul was considered an apostate by his own countrymen that did believe in Jesus. We can see this in Acts 21:17-24. In this same set of verses one can see that James, the very brother of Jesus himself, and all the thousands with him kept "all" of the Torah [Acts 21:22]. This is an amazing verse to see, especially if Jesus' very own brother wouldn't drop from observing the Law. For if the Torah was truly done away with, he above all people should have known this fact. The fact, however, is that the Torah was never eradicated and Paul is indeed a true "canonized" apostate.

Before I move on with my paper, I must set up another premise, but this time it is concerning the four gospels. One must understand that the four Gospels were not written by actual eyewitnesses to the life of Jesus. Nor did these authors ever hear Jesus' words. Rather, these "Gospels" were written down years after Yehoshua's resurrection and they are strictly based on "hear-say." All four Gospels were not even written by Jewish men, but by Gentiles who did not grow up knowing or practicing Judaism. Because of these basic facts, we can understand "why" there are several hard-core anti-Judaic teachings in their writings. We can also understand why there are hundreds upon hundreds of contradictions between the Gospels, and in some cases, a gospel will contradict itself. I will touch on some of these contradictions later on. We will also delve into what particular anti-Judaic theological lessons are being taught in the four Gospels in their detailed lessons and in their overall lessons. 

However, I would like to quickly touch on one particular topic right now in order to help you to understand the main premise of this paper by talking about a sub-topic. This topic is an overall theme throughout the four gospels, the topic is "salvation." The gospel "of John" is radically different than the other three gospels in "how" one obtains salvation.

Matthew, Mark and Luke are very Judaic in nature when it comes to their overall theology regarding "how" one obtains salvation. To these three authors, "salvation" is obtained by meeting certain conditions. Those conditions are these: a person must strictly observe all of the Mosaic Law and they must believe that Jesus is the prophet that the prophets of Israel foretold about in their writings. This prophet would be greater than all the other prophets, the foretold Jewish messiah. Salvation to these authors wasn't based on faith alone, nor obedience alone, but the two working simultaneously together. Now, even though these three gospels are very Judaic when it comes to salvation, they are very anti-Judaic when it comes to certain narratives and stories surrounding Jesus and other topics which oppose the teachings of how the prophets of Israel foretold what their messiah would be like. These anti-Judaic teachings and topics are namely: the virgin birth, life after death, and other things - which I will touch on later.

The Gospel of John, however, is very Paul-ine in nature when it come to its overall message of "how" a person obtains salvation. In the Gospel of John, salvation is obtained by merely "believing Jesus is the messiah and that he was in fact sent from heaven." There is no reference in this Gospel that a person needs to obey the law of Moses, unlike the other three, especially the Gospel of Matthew. Instead of specifically keeping the Mosaic law,  Jesus commanded his followers to keep "my commandments." If you were to count them, there are only about five commandments in the whole gospel. Only two of those five commandments are found in the Mosaic law (there are hundreds of these commands given by the God of Israel Himself). These particular two commands are "loving your fellow man" and "believe that Yehoshua ben Yosef [Joshua/Jesus, son of Joseph] is the foretold prophet" that other prophets talked about in their writings. This foretold prophet being the messiah or the "chosen one / anointed one" of Yehowah who would shepherd the people of the God of Israel like no other shepherd.

To go along with my premise regarding Judaism, one must understand that the prophets NEVER taught that there is any compound spirit in all of existence, which most definitely includes the God "of Israel." What I mean by "compound" is that there is no spirit in all of existence, according to the faith of the prophets - which is Judaism, in which a being/person has more than one personality or some "divided" identity, like what the idolatrous "Christians" say about our God. For they describe our God as being "the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit." This is very blasphemous to us Jewish folks, because the prophets taught the belief in a pure, not a fake, monotheistic God. Thus, if I were to use "Christian" lingo for a moment, only the "Father" is the "God of Israel" and He alone. He is a spirit and the most holiest of all the spirits. He alone is the only spirit that has never had a beginning point. The moshaich, the angels, the seraphs and ... all share one thing in common, they all have had a beginning point, thus none of these other spirits are eternal, nor divine.

There is no third person called the "Holy Spirit" in Judaism. Rather, when a person reads something in the Jewish Scriptures like Isaiah 61:1 that says, "The Spirit of the Lord is upon me...." It would be better translated like this, "The spirit, Yehowah, is upon me.." This is because Yehowah is a spirit, not that there is a spirit inside of Him, unlike our mortal bodies that contain our individual spirits. Likewise, by this passage, we can clearly see that the messiah and Yehowah are separate individuals, being two separate people, because the messiah needs to be "anointed" by the Spirit, Yehowah, resting upon him in order to preach. This would be absurd to say if the messiah were "God" and he would not know what to say to humans in order to convert them to righteousness!!

The Jewish prophets only saw two main and very unique individuals in their lives, the God of Israel and His son. Only One is eternal, this is the God of Israel alone, His son is a made being. Because he is made, he obviously can't be compared to his God, but when compared to the other spirits in the heavens he is greater than them all.

To delve into some righteous philosophy for a moment, here it is: All children are younger than their parents. With that being said, just by this fact alone we can see that the son of the Living God is not eternal, because one who is younger than the Eternal One is clearly not eternal himself, but has had a beginning point. This is what the prophets taught as well in Micah 5:2 when Micah said that "whose origins/birth" or "coming into existence came before the accounting of time."

Thus, Judaism teaches the existence of a pure monotheistic God, not a false compound god. This God is also the only God in all of existence in the religion of Judaism. Judaism is the only faith that He gave to humanity.

The reason I say all these things is so that any reader can fully understand Judaic Biblical thought, instead of any false notion. What I like to tell people on the street is this, if a person is going to take the Jewish Bible [Genesis through Malachi] for themselves and preach from it, they had better know the doctrines therein before doing so. This is because if one doesn't know these things, they are simply bearing false testimony concerning the "Jewish" Bible. People must keep in mind that the "Jewish" messiah must only observe and promote the "Jewish" religion, that being Judaism. If one claims to be the Jewish messiah and does not promote Judaism and nothing but Judaism, that person is a false messiah according to the "Jewish" Bible. The messiah and the Torah, along with Judaism, must always remain married in order to fully understand the truth about the "Jewish" religion. For the most part, so-called "Christians" have hijacked the Jewish Bible to make it a part of their own, and -yet - they totally misrepresent it and contradict it, we at HeShallGovern Outreach / Kanay Chasidim don't want you to be like this, instead, we want you to be highly educated.

This article is mainly made for those that have never grown up with any Judaic background, yet want to learn about who and/or what the "messiah /christ" is according to the faith of the Jewish prophets.  In order to have a correct understanding of the doctrines or beliefs surrounding the Jewish messiah, one must understand the theology of Judaism, instead of what any 'Christian' institution might say about him. This is not meant to sound offensive by any means, rather I am simply being straightforward: Mainstream "Christianity," whether churches, various denominations, or their many universities are a total disconnect from the biblically-minded Jew or what Judaism has taught for centuries and millenniums through the Hebrew prophets who lived long before Jesus was even born and the advent or dawn of "Christianity." Keep in mind that the prophets and seers of the Hebrew people uttered the very words of Yehowah Himself [the sole God of Israel] as He moved upon them and spoke to them.

Furthermore, regarding what I said earlier concerning James and those that were like him [not the followers of Paul], these were the first and original believers in Jesus - being Jewish believers. They were never seen as a new religion, but only as a sect within Judaism, like the various Hasidic, Orthodox, Conservative and Reform groups that exist today within the "Rabbinical" branch of Judaism; or as the Karaites exist as a normal genuine sect of biblical Judaism instead of 'Rabbinical" Judaism, though they are awful and do not keep the Torah as prescribed, for they have their own interpretations. A genuine "new" religion called "Christianity" started or arose when certain believers in Jesus [namely: the Gentile believers] who never knew Jesus or anything of his ancestral religion started saying and believing heretical concepts, notions, ideas and things about Jesus that were simply far from the truth. This occurred mainly after their numbers began to abound. Some of those heretical things started from Paul, but others are purely from the Gentiles. "Grace / anti-Torah," "pre-destination," and "the sinful nature" are all teachings from Paul; whereas the teaching that Jesus is "God in the flesh" and the "virgin" birth are pure inventions of the Gentiles. Paul did not believe in the virgin birth, nor that Jesus was "God in the flesh." This is why modern mainstream so-called "Christianity" is a different religion altogether and not merely a sect within Judaism. Christianity is a "cross-breed" of the heretical teachings of Paul and of the ignorant Gentile believers of Jesus that knew nothing of Judaism. Practically everything that mainstream "Christianity" teaches is a total "disconnect" from the teachings of the prophets, there are hardly any similarities. OY!!

Another reason for wanting to go to a Torah-observant person that is well educated in his Judaism instead of a simple layman or observer of the commandments is so that he can give you a correct understanding of what the "messiah" is all about. This is especially true in regards to learning from a non-Jew, for the whole notion surrounding "a messiah" or "a saviour" came from the Jewish or Hebrew people. So, honestly speaking, you would never want to go to some non-Judaic incompetent person that would not know what he is talking about, nor the things regarding the biblical faith known as Judaism. I, on the other hand, will try to explain things to you even more clearly than I already have, yet with some scriptural backup so that you can understand these things. Even by what I have written so far, you should clearly see the explanation of "why" the majority of Jewish folks don't believe in Jesus as their messiah. Not because of what Jesus himself said, but because of what others say or have said about him. This is especially true when a Jewish person gets done talking with a mainstream "Christian," or after reading their writings * (see note), or after seeing their churches and the manner of lifestyle in which they live. For the mainstream "Christian" is very "anti-Jewish" and not at all "Jewish friendly," even though they say, "I love Israel and the Jewish people." "Christians" simply can't "see" that their ways are vile and offensive, because they think that they are right and the poor Jewish man or woman "must" come to their way of thinking, when the reality is that the "Christian" needs to convert to the Jewish mindset and see Jesus in this light and nothing but in this light. Then the so-called "Christian" will "see" how awful the "Gospels" are in portraying historical Jesus and the events surrounding his life. They will also see the absurdity of having the writings of Paul canonized.

* = Notice I did not say, "...after reading Jesus' words and what he did." I say this because this paper will try to show the great differences between the historical Jesus and prophecied messiah vs. the things and teachings said about the Jesus of mainstream Christianity. I also want to point out the fact that the biographies about Jesus are only found in four Gospels which were made by people that never eyewitnessed a single event surrounding Jesus, nor heard a single word that he ever uttered; and therefore, making the reliability of their accounts concerning him not very reliable. This is especially noted when they contradict between themselves on the same topic or story. One top of these problems, we have the fact that these four gospels were produced by Gentiles that did not know the teachings of Biblical Judaism, which explains some of the paganistic or anti-Judaic teaching found in them. I will not go as far as to say that Matthew, Mark and Luke did not practice Judaism, but if Matthew and Luke did, they sure had a messed up view of the facts, because these two gospels talk about the virgin birth of Jesus. The author of the "Gospel of John" clearly did not practice the Torah, we can see this by the things that he wrote. To claim whether or not "Matthew, Mark and Luke" kept or did not keep the Torah cannot be said with any certainty. Their writings, however, promote the Judaic ideals in which salvation is only obtained by being righteous and that only comes by observing all of the Mosaic law and believing Jesus is the promised moshiach simultaneously. 

Mainstream 'Christianity' [i.e. Catholics, Protestants, Lutherans, Methodists, Pentecostals, Assemblies of God, Baptists, Church of Christ, Church of God, Church of the Nazarenes, Calvary Chapel, AMC and others like them] and "out-of-the-mainstream" Christian sects [such as "Seventh Day Adventists, Mormons, Jehovah Witnesses, Jews for Jesus, Chosen People Ministries, Tony Alamo, Kenneth Koplen, Joel Osteen and...], teaches the direct opposite of what Judaism teaches in many regards and in many of their major tenents of faith; yet, they all have the gall to claim that they are rooted in Judaism, which could not be further from the truth. Now to those that truly seek after the truth, like yourself [as evidenced by the fact that you are reading this page] often times end up being "Judaic" in many of their views. I say "many," and not "all," because the great differences in concepts and teachings between Biblical Judaism and mainstream Christianity are so different from each other, that they end up being great obstacles for the person to leap over in order for the them to simply throw away a long "cherished," yet false, belief. Therefore, the person seeking the truth only converts to a little bit of Judaic teaching versus coming to a "full circle" conversion that leads their name to be written in the book of life.

Can I say something very odd sounding? People of "mainstream" Christianity are indisputably ensnared into satanic beliefs by what is actually found or taught in their very own so-called "bible."

WOW - WHAT A STATEMENT!!

Like I said, not a single biography of Jesus exists by one of his actual disciples, nor even by a Jewish person. The writings that do survive of Jesus were written by four Gentiles that never knew him, saw him, nor heard him. In fact, we don't really have any book from the 11 apostles that describe the life of Jesus in any way, none. I find that amazingly terrible, because here we have the writings of certain Israeli prophets that pre-date the life of Jesus by hundreds of years. Yet, we don't have a single manuscript from Jesus himself, that was proclaimed by the other prophets to be the greatest of all the prophets - the messiah. Dear reader, I hope you got the importance of what I just wrote. In fact, if you read the early so-called "church" writings you can see that they didn't mention the existence of any such writings. One must know this one fact though when thinking about these things, it is this: people like Papius, Polycarp, Ignatius, Irenaeus and other early church writers [early Catholic writers, theologians and apologists], who were all Pauline Gentiles, wrote all their works after the destruction of the Holy Temple of Jerusalem by Titus in 70 CE/AD and after all the Jews were banned from Jerusalem by the Italians. The reason I am saying this is because it "could have" been at this time, when the Temple was destroyed in 70 CE/AD, that early Jewish writings were lost to history. Writings that possibly could have come from Jesus' own hand or a biography about him from one of his 11 apostles and possibly anything written by John the Baptist. I, however, lean toward a much earlier time than 70 C.E as to when something tragic like this "might" have occurred. Namely when people like Saul/Paul persecuted the early Jewish believers in Judea for their bold confessions that Yehoshua ben Yosef of Nazareth was the long foretold messiah.

Not that the "Book of Acts" is all that accurate when it comes to historical data, but to use it for a quick example, let me show you something of interest to give some credence to what I am leaning towards. In Acts  7, after Stephan gives his long speech, several Jewish men, that did not like his message, nor his beliefs about Yoshua/Joshua/Jesus got very angry at him and then dragged him out of Jerusalem and stoned him to death. When you read this awful story, notice that Saul was not one that actually did the stoning of Stephan. The reason I say this is because Saul eventually converted to believe in Jesus as the Jewish messiah, but the others did not. Do you see my point? These same people were still persecuting the Jewish believers, even though only one of them converted. If you look in Acts 8:3 you can see something of interest that Saul did. There it says, "As for Saul, he made havoc of the church, entering into every house, and hauling men and women away and committing [them] to prison." When Saul and others like him entered into the very homes of the Yehoshua-ite Israeli believers, it is my opinion that this is when the writings about Jesus were destroyed in order to wipe out this so-called new "heretical" sect of Judaism, not that these Jewish people who believed Yehoshua ben Yosef was the Jewish moshiach formed some "new" religion that separated itself from Judaism as you have today with mainstream so-called "Christianity." So, it is in my opinion that from the time that Acts 8:3 took  place (which was probably around 44 AD) to the time Titus banned all Jewish people  from Jerusalem in 70 AD, the people that where like Paul did this sort of thing during these set years on a continual bases, not that it occurred just this one time in Acts 8:3. This also might explain why there are not very much writings from that time by Jewish authors that promoted this way of Judaic thinking, except for the "Epistle of James," which this unknown "James" author only addresses the "twelve tribes [of Israel] which were "scattered abroad [James 1:1]," not that he was addressing all people. Keep in mind that if the Jewish messiah is supposed to be the "crown jewel" of all those that practice and promote Torah-Living, then a Gentile according to the law was obligated to be circumcised and keep all of the Torah just like a natural born Israeli must do. For the Torah states that the foreigner and the Israeli are to have the same law, not that the Gentile is to observe a more liberal law than the Israeli [Gen 17:9-14, Lev 24:22, Deut 31:12, Isa 56:6-7 and...]

PAUSING: Let me pause for a moment to tell you that if you simply want some quick references to prove that Jesus is not the God of Israel, please visit my webpage called, "8 BIBLICAL PROOFS FROM THE JEWISH BIBLE [THE TANACH] THAT SHOW THAT THE "JEWISH" MESSIAH IS NOT THE GOD OF ISRAEL ." I am telling you this now, because this article is pretty long and you might have simply come here to find some quick and easy answers. In truth, this article proves this case in rich detail so that you can thoroughly know that the messiah "of Israel" is NOT the God of Israel. With that let me move on...

As I was saying, we do not have any writings of the apostles themselves about the life or ministry of their master and rabbi, Yehoshua Ben Yosef. What we have are four literal "hear-say" contradictory accounts from four Gentile men that never saw, witnessed, nor heard Jesus at any point, yet they write about him. Because Paul's teachings are heretical to the teachings of the prophets and to the Jewish believers that lived in those days, if we were to eradicate his writings from the modern mainstream Christian Bible, like the King James Version or the New International Version [NIV], the "Christian" bible would suddenly lose about 34% of its size. 

Then when we look to "The Book of Hebrews," it also is very "Pauline-istic" in nature, making heretical in its overall message, instead of it being parallel to the teachings of the prophets. Furthermore, this book is very historically and biblically false on several subjects. If you care to know some of these things, here are a few examples:

1. In Hebrews 7:1-3 the author claims that Melchizedek was never born, but is eternal and thus also calling the

   messiah eternal, which is absolutely false on both counts. For Melchizedek was an Amorite king who

   eventually died like every other man, except for Elijah and Enoch.

2. In Hebrews 7:19 the author boldly claims that the law of Moses "made nothing perfect," yet all through the

   Torah people were made righteous, holy and blameless and "perfect" before the God of Israel by keeping

   the Torah and only by keeping the Torah [Ezekiel 18, Ex 32:31-33, Deut 6:25 & 18:13, 1 King 8:61, 15:3,

   Job 1:1, Isa 38:3 and...]

3. In Hebrews 10:4 the author says that it is "not possible that the blood of bulls and of goats should take away

   sins." Yet, all through the Torah that is exactly how sin is purged. One  great  example is  in  Num  15:27-28

   where the God of Israel "forgives" the sin of the transgressor after he/she gives  a  sin  offering,  thus  directly

   countering the ignorant author of "Hebrews." Here are those verses, "And if any soul sin  through  ignorance,

   then he shall bring a she goat of the first year for a sin offering. And the priest shall  make  an  atonement  for

   the soul that sinneth ignorantly, when he sinneth by  ignorance  before  the  LORD,  to  make  an  atonement

   for him; and it shall be forgiven him."  Seems pretty clear to me!!! Keep in  mind  that  the  God of  Israel  is

   saying this, not some man or woman.

4. The overall theology is "justification by faith" and a "salvation based on grace," thus  making it  very  Pauline-

   istic in its world view [Heb 10:38-39, 11:7, 12:15 and...], instead of taking the worldview of Jesus or of

   Judaism,  which  both  said   "salvation"  was  strictly  based  on  the   condition   of   observing   all   of   the

   commandments, all of the time, with perfect integrity [Matthew 5:17-20, 19:17, 23:1-3 & 23:23 and Psalm

   119:155 and ...].

5. Whoever the author was, one who seemed to be an Israeli, was extremely ignorant of the Israelite people or his own people as far as history goes and what certain stories say in the Torah. For this is what the author wrote in Hebrews 11:27, when speaking about Moshe [Moses], "By faith he forsook Egypt, not fearing the wrath of the king." This is an absolutely ignorant statement, for the Torah we have today is the same Torah that this author had in his day. The reason I am saying this is because that very same Torah says nothing like this, but the direct opposite. So here we have some unknown author trying to accredit himself as some great author, yet he makes statements that go directly against what the Torah declares in it's pages. In actuality, therefore, the author discredits himself to all those that have knowledge. However, "mainstream Christians" are very ignorant of the stories within the Torah, because they are taught by Paul not to really bother looking into the Law of Moses. Likewise, they accept blindly anything as truth as long as it has been "canonized," thinking that such documents are the "inspired words of God," which couldn't be further from the truth. I will give my comments about this particular verse in a moment, however I must let you understand a few things first. One must know or remember that every book found in the bible, whether of the Jewish bible [Tanach / "OT"] or of the "Christian Bible," these books were their own independent book at one point in time. Meaning, they were never seen as a part of some collective book as we see today. So when someone came across these independent books, they were made to stand on their own merits and they were judged that way and never to form an overall picture of things. Eventually, however, people began to gather these separate writings and put them all together to form a single big book, called "the bible."

To break down what I just said even further, what I mean is that "Jeremiah" was a separate book, totally apart from anything else. I think most people can understand this. The same goes for Isaiah, each psalm, the book of Haggai the prophet and so forth. Therefore, not everyone came across these writings, because they were separated. Isaiah the prophet never saw the writings of Jeremiah and Jeremiah never saw the writings of Zechariah. King David never read the proverbs of Solomon, Ecclesiastes, Song of Songs, many Psalms, nor anything that is written from Isaiah onward in the Jewish bible, not even 1 Kings and 2 Kings. David actually wrote many of the psalms and he had the real Torah for his "scripture" and he lived with some prophets or had lived with them, like Samuel, Nathan and Gad. Even David's own writings were "scripture" because he was prophesying when he wrote many of his psalms and other writings, which all are lost to history, so far. That is the originals or ones put in stone or something.

All the prophets point to the Torah, this is why the prophets are not read all that much in the synagogue in comparison to the Torah. Because the Torah is the "will of HaShem." Likewise, why read the words of the prophets if all they are doing is telling you to study and obey the Torah? Do you get my point? Of course we read the prophets for other reasons, but I am making an overall statement of fact about what their writings are about.

When it comes to the Jewish Bible only the writings of the prophets were deemed "scripture" in the minds of people of ancient Israel, anything else were merely writings that came out of out theocratic society. However, those other writings that did not come from the hands of the prophets were open to error, of which there are hundreds of errors found in them, even though those writings have also been "canonized."

Now when it comes to the "Christian Bible," each book was originally seen as independent works, never intended to be compared to other writings. Again, as with the Jewish bible, in the process of time these independent books or works were rounded up to form a single big book, called the bible. The big evil, however, is that the ones gathering these particular books were Paul-ine disciples who knew very little about Judaism. Nonetheless, they though that these chosen books were "inspired," based on "their [those collecting the books]" beliefs.  Anything that did not fit into their beliefs was rejected. Well, once these Paul-ine believers had gathered these books together to form a single book the mentality of the people changed to a worldview where they considered all these "canonized" writings as "inspired." In reality, however, hardly none of them were, except for Revelation possibly. The reason why Revelation would be the only book to be considered "inspired" is because it is the only book of the NT Canon based on a vision and because the author was in direct contact with [1] an angel, [2] the moshiach and [3] the God of Israel who were all telling him what to write. On the other hand, however, the reason that it may not be a legitimate prophecy of the end times is because nowhere does it mention the coming of Elijah the prophet as Malachi does "before the coming of the great and dreadful day of YHWH [Mal 4:5]." Many books in the first and second century were deemed "inspired" or "scripture," but they did not make it into the modern canon. The "Apocalypse of Peter" was also a "end time" prophecy, yet it did not make it into the N.T. canon, even though it was read many years after its author first came out with it and that it was considered "scripture" to thousands of people. I say all of this because the people who put together the NT Canon did not know anyone of importance. They did not know Yehoshua, nor any of the apostles, yet they all claim to be offshoots from their direct teachings, which couldn't be further from the truth, because none of their beliefs are Judaic, they first followed the teachings of Paul then they evolved into deeper anti-Judaic beliefs. I say this because Paul did not believe in the virgin birth [Italians 1:3], nor did he believe that Jesus was "God in the flesh," see 1 Col 15:27-28. Furthermore, when considering whether or not "Revelation" is a true prophecy one must realize that it does not mention Elijah the prophet anywhere [even though it does mention "two witnesses"]. Because of this fact, one really has to question its reliablity. The reason for this is because Elijah is a very famous and important person in the Jewish bible. In fact, Elijah is still realivant today, because he never died, but went to heaven because of how righteous he was. According to another Jewish prophet named Malachai, Elijah is expected to come back near the end of the age and usher in the coming of the true "Jewish" moshiach. Elijah, therefore, would have to come down from heaven, yet "Revelation" gives the idea that the "two witnesses" are already on earth long before they are endowed with "power [Rev 11:3]" vs. "coming down [from heaven] with power" in order for them to prophecy for 1,260 days. When Revelation says what it does this indicates neither of these two witnesses can be Elijah the Tishbite. Another thing to consider when trying to understand whether or not Revelation is a true prophecy or not, when "Revelation" talks about these two witnesses it says that these two witnesses are the "two olive trees and the two candlesticks standing before the God of the earth" in Rev 11:5. Well, this reference is taken from Zachariah 4 and these two "olive trees" are Zerubbabel and Joshua the priest in this chapter of Zechariah, not that one of them is Elijah. Revelation says that these two witnesses basically usher in the messiah's reign, which contradicts Malachi 4 where Elijah does. Likewise, what are the twelve names on the foundations of the "New Jerusalem," named after the "twelve aposin Rev 21:14  seeing that Judas betrayed Jesus? Likewise, according to theology of the Tanach, regardless how a person dies, whether naturally, or by murder, martyrdom, suisude or being cursed and so dying by some other means, that person's spirit remains asleep until the resurrection of his dead body. Thus, he doesn't go to heaven nor hell upon death, but is asleep. Yet in Revelation 6:9 we see beheaded martyrs having "life after death" in heaven under the altar that is in heaven and in Rev 20:4-5 they are referenced again. These same martyrs are the only ones that are resurrected for the millennial reign of the moshiach, whereas the rest are resurrected after Jesus's first millennial reign. These things contradict the promises given to Abraham where the God of Israel precisely said to him "all the land that thou seest, to thee I will give it [Gen 13:15]." The word "will" has not been fulfilled yet, but when the moshaich comes, being a greater prophet than Moses and Elijah, he will resurrect all the dead, the wicked and the righteous, but only those that have their name in the "book of life [Exodus 32:31-33]," based on their Torah observance and correct theology shall live under the blessings of the moshiach's monarchy. When the moshiach comes, in Jewish prophecy, not Christian prophecy, there is no 1,000 year reign, then the judgment. Rather, in Jewish prophecy Elijah the Tishbite comes and restores things back to the ancient ways that have been lost then following right on the heels of the coming of Elijah is the coming of the holy moshiach. When the moshiach comes, according to the prophecies found in the Tanach, all the dead are raised to life after a certain amount of time, according to Daniel 12:2, and all are judged at that time.Yes, according to Daniel 2 and Daniel 7 the moshaich will come and destroy or take over a fourth particular kingdom and the moshiach will conquer the whole earth and fulfill the prophecy of Zech 14:9 that says only he shall be king over the whole earth. However, unlike Revelation, according to the prophet Zachariah when the moshiach comes he will not put to death all the wicked, but willprecisely curse those that fought against Jerusalem. Everyone in those days must go up to celebrate the Feast of Tabernacles. It is at this time the wolf shall sleep with the lamb and so forth. Thus, he will be monarch over the world - apparently - for some time, over the righteous and the wicked and will at sometime resurrect the dead and then enter into judgment with them all. 

Another distortion Revelation does that goes against Jewish prophecy is that the author of Revelatin places the prophecy of Ezekiel 38 and 39 after the 1,000 year millennial reign of Jesus, where "Gog and Magog, " not "Gog of the land of Magog [as Ezekiel says]," shall come against Jerusalem - "the holy city," not on the "mountains of Israel," as Ezekiel 39:2 says. For if you read Ez 39:9, it is clear that the soldiers of Gog died outside from the cities and that it might take place in the Golan Heights, near the Sea of Galilee. I say this because according to Ezekiel 39:11 the Israelites will bury their bodies "east of the sea" in some valley. According to Ez 39:11 this valley where they shall be buried shall be called Hamon-Gog [which means "the crowds, multitude, or company - of - Gog"]. So while Revelation places this story in Jerusalem and after the millennial reign of Jesus, the Jewish prophets said that it will take place long before the coming of the moshiach where pagans and heathens shall still be around [Ez 39:7]. The only thing what the two stories have in common is that "fire" will destroy the troops of Gog [Ezekiel 38:22 and Rev 20:9.] Revelation, however, says that Gog will be included in the numbers of those dying in this battle, whereas Ezekiel does not mention that Gog himself does and the way Ezekiel is written it seems that Gog remains alive, yet is highly shamed.

Revelation, apppears to be tainted by the Catholics [at least the KJV] in some verses because when you compare Rev 22:12-13,16 with Rev 1:8 Jesus is the "Almighy." Whereas, according dozens of other verses of Revelation he isn't the God of Israel, such as 3:2, 3:13 and many others others. Furthermore, the book of Revelation promotes the "Trinity" which is total anti-Judaic in nature. For when you read in Rev 22:17, "The Spirit and the bride say..." it is clear that the "Spirit" is a different person than the person named "Jesus" in the previous verse [v.22:16] and he is different from the person called "God" in verse 22:9. There are many other things Revelation states that goes against the Jewish prophets and what they say about the end times and what Jesus himself says about such times in Matthew 24, if you were to read this chapter seperately or a part from Revelation or without Revelation influencing your reading of Matthew 24.

Now let me move on to other things then finally move on to this article. I am saying these thin because they need to be pointed out so that you can understand the strong differences between the faith of the real prophets, who practiced Judaism, from the faith of so-called "Christianity" that promotes and teaches many things that oppose Judaism and her prophets taught in the name of YHWH. Yet, "Christianity" will take the Jewish Bible [the Tanach], hi-jacking it, and then claim "this is what it teaches, according to our teaching," which couldn't be further from the truth. Muslims say they believe in the Jewish prophets, yet they don't obey them and they teach the direct oppose what the Jewish prophets taught. Mormons hi-jack our bible and then claim that our God is only one God out of many and that He is a polygamist and so forth. "Christianity" is literally in the same boat with the Mormons and the Muslims, by hi jacking our Tanach and then highly misrepresenting it. This is true from their beliefs in "life after death;" the messiah is God; the God of Israel is a trinity; the messiah is prophecied to be born from a virgin; the law of Moses and of the prophets - the Torah, was done away with - except for the things of morality and for a handful of other commandments; and other things. 

Just on a footnoot, the Book of Hebrews" gives the appearence that it's author might have been Paul, because the author claims to know "Timothy [Heb 13:23]," one of Paul's companions and that he "might have" been in a prison [Heb 13:19] somewhere in Italy [13:24]. However,  Paul usually gives a great introduction to his letters where this particular letter doesn't have any introduction at all, thus possibly making it not Paul at all but someone like him, like Barnabas or Silas. Another clue we have about the author is that whoever this person is, he seems to be an Israelite, because of how he speaks of the ancestors of Israel, as if they were his own people. Plus, it seems like he is writing to a Jewish audiance by the fact that the author uses "Jewish" wording as his introduction. The beginning of his letter starts out by saying these words, "God, who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets." This sounds very Jewish, wheras if he were not an Israelite his wording would be different, something like this: "God, who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the naation [or people] of Israel," or something that would make it sound like that he doesn't have the same racial background as the prophets and the people of Israel. Whoever the author was, the person did not know that much regarding the "real" truth. This book, therefore, is to be considered heretical, which in turn would cause it to be eradicated from the "Christina" bible if we are to make things in the manner of Jesus' teaching and of Judaism and no other form of teaching. A real Christian "Bible" must fit the worldview of the Jewish believers that existed before Paul came on the scene, thus making the currect one even smaller if we have already imagined that we cut out all of Paul's writings. This would than proves my point once again, in that not very writings exist to this day that actually follows Jesus' words and of Judaism, except for a few. What really baffles me about the author of "Hebrews" is when he makes a great statement about Jesus, yet then turns around and contradicts Jesus by teaching something that he never taught. For in Hebrews 13:8 the author says this, "Jesus Christ, the same yesterday, and today, and for ever." Well, if that were the case, why then is the teaching of this particular author, who promoted grace or a salvation based on faith alone, so different than the doctrine that Jesus promoted, where Jesus says, "if you want to enter into life, you must keep the commandments/the mosaic law [Matt 19:17]." And why is Jesus condemning to hell believers, not just  un-believers, on the day of his judgment in Matthew 7:21-23, if a believer is merely was "saved" by faith? Again, why would Jesus only claim that his brothers and sisters were/are those that keep the Torah [Matt 12:50 and Mark 3:5].

"The Book of Jude" is a heretical book as well, because it promotes things that go directly against the stories of the Torah, but follows more closely with the heretical writings found in the apocraphaical manuscripts.   

After I explain five major tenets of "mainstream Christianity" or so-called "orthodox" Christianity that goes directly against the teachings of prophets of Israel and what they and the Jewish people have taught since the days of Abraham, I will move on to further proofs as to "Why Jesus is NOT the 'God of Israel in the flesh.' "  If I may be so bold, the teachings that the Jewish prophets talked about  go as afar back as the days of Adam himself, if we are to believe that Adam and Moses believed in the same God. Now, here are those 5 things:

1. As I have said many times before, the God of the Jewish or Hebrew people [Yehowah] is not a compound god consisting of three individuals or personalities or characteristics or characters, just one personality. Again, Judaism teaches that we only have a pure and absolute monotheistic God, not "Yehowah is one," but that "there is only one Yehowah or God of the Universe."

"Y-h-w-h" also means "was, is and forever" or "Eternal One" so one can say, "Only One is Eternal!" Again, not "Yehowah is one" as some translations have for Deut 6:4, which can give the illusion that there is some "compoundedness" going on. Rather, the verse should read something like this in order to give it a more accurate rendering, "Hear O Israel, Yehowah our God, just one is Eternal [Yhwh]." Or, even better: "Hear O Israel, Yehowah our God, Yehowah stands alone [meaning: there is no other, but Him.]" Whereas, mainstream "Christianity" teaches the direct opposite by ignorantly promoting that our Hebrew God is a paganistic compound god, being the "Father, Son and a Holy Spirit." Having three separate personalities, characteristics and missions/callings/jobs/duties or positions, yet these three separate personalities are wrapped up into one being or god. Like a many ingredients make a burrito - OY. Do I sound "blasphemous?" Good, because that is how obscene the "Trinity" belief is. In fact, just so say something for argument sake, if this belief is sooo important, and the foundation of knowing who the God of Israel is "Why" don't the prophets talk about this most important belief? They don't talk about this, because they didn't believe in this non-sense, that's why!! This Trinitarian doctrine is so far from the teachings of the Judaic prophets, yet so-called 'Christian" apologists will vehemently oppose you if you show them the truth of what Judaism teaching. With that I say, "Let them be destroyed by the real moshiach when he comes," who is merely the servant of the Living God, not that he IS the Living God. In fact, the word "Trinity" was not even coined until a pagan apologist named Tertullian came up with it in 200 CE/AD.

Now, let me speak in more detail about the real Jewish messiah. As I said just awhile ago, the messiah of the Jewish people must walk in the same fashion as all the other Jewish prophets by keeping and promoting the Torah. However, what sets him apart from the other prophets is that he will reign over the whole entire earth as the sole monarch and that the Torah will be the only body of Law to his monarchy. His monarchy, therefore, will be a holy theocracy as was King David's and Melchizedek's, of which the prophets foretold his would be like [Psalm 110:4, 2 Sam 7:12-16, Psalm 89 & 132, Daniel 2 & 7, Isa 9:7]. Likewise, according to the prophets, all those that have not kept the torah when he arrives shall be banished to his prison and shall not enjoy his sovereignty, but shall only know his wrath [Daniel 12:2, Malachi 4:1-4, Ezekiel 18, Exodus 32:31-33 and...]

The other thing and main thing that sets the "messiah" apart from the other prophets is this: when a human is conceived in the womb, that person's spirit is literally created on the spot and so his/her spirit is a new creation, even though their flesh is merely made from his or her parents that descended from Adam and Eve. The messiah "of Judaism," not of mainstream "Christianity," on the other hand must be like every other human when it comes to his flesh, being the direct result from a natural sexual union [remember I said 'of Judaism'], not miraculously conceived in some virgin girl - I will prove this in a moment. His spirit, however, would not be created upon his conception but that it was merely inserted into the conception process, so that he, literally, would [and did] become a man versus him simply or merely being the best and most powerful spirit serving or that served the Living God [the One and Only Eternal Spirit]. At that very moment he was transformed into a normal human, with that came the particular fulfillment of Psalm 8:5 that says, "You [Yehowah] caused him to be dis-ranked below the mighty ones ["Elohim" = the angels or the heavenly hosts in this case]." Then after Jesus' ascension Yehowah fulfilled the rest of this verse that says, "and You crowned him with glory and honor." So even here one can see that Yehowah and the one being crowned with "glory and honor" are separate individuals.

When this mighty servant and spirit became apart of this world by being conceived, the God of Israel had him start from scratch and gave him a blank slate, just like a new born child would have. Thus, he had to learn everything anew just like all of us had to learn everything from a blank slate from the time of our conception. Thus, he became ignorant any existence he had before he was conceived in Mariam's [Mary's] womb and of all the things he ever did and said until the day of his "awakening" or "revelation" that would come several decades later. This, is also "why" there are no accounts about his childhood years, because no one knew that he was the messiah, not even he himself [I know by saying this I directly oppose certain narratives found in these "Gentile" gospels, but nonetheless this is the case, because he must arise to greatness like the other prophets before him, who were Torah observant first and then they were commissioned.]

Now even though this is the case about what I just said, the God of Israel was guiding this whole process along, because this person was appointed to fulfill certain tasks and prophecies for Him. Thus, not only did the God of Israel cause him to be inserted into the conception process of when Joseph and Mariam had normal sexual intercourse, but that he was conceived into a family that was Torah observant. Because of this Jesus was to a good footing, because only the Torah observant are granted salvation according to the prophets of his culture. That culture based on the teachings of Judaism, the religion of the Jewish Bible - as it says in Psalm 119:155, "Salvation is far from the wicked for they seek not Your statutes." However, not only did the God of Israel orchestrate him in this affair, but also by the fact that Jesus' flesh was from Joseph's physical seed of which Joseph was one of the many descendants of the Royal blood line of King David, Solomon and most of the Kings of Judah, all the way to King Josiah. When Yehowah did this for Jesus these things became a partial fulfillment of a prophecy found in Psalm 132:11 that says, "YHWH hath sworn in truth unto David; He will not turn from it; Of the fruit of thy body will I set upon thy throne." The "throne" part was never fulfilled, but shall be fulfilled in the near future. Thus, Jesus was a direct descendant of King David, which he would have to be in order to be the true "Jewish" messiah. Jesus was NOT born from a virgin girl and the early Jewish believers did not believe this idea or notion as we can see by the evidence that the early "church" elders wrote these things in their writings. These "church" elders were Gentile Pauline apologists, that know nothing of Judaism and deemed these Jewish believers as heretics. These elders were people like Ignatius, Irenaeus and others. Its funny that these same Gentiles authors wrote that these Jewish believers deemed them to be the true heretics and those that invent all sorts of evil doctrines.

So, again, to make things very clear for you, according to Judaism, there are only two main individuals of importance that the prophets wrote about: Yehowah, the only God of Israel, Who is the only Eternal Spirit out of all the spirits that exist. The second person or spirit [who is neither divine, nor eternal, but a servant] is the person they referred to as the "moshiach," the "son of David," the "root of Jesse" and several other different names, yet none of them being "Immanuel" dispute what "Christians" say, because of the falsenarrative found in the Gentile's writings that has come to be called, "the Gospel of Matthew." This person, the messiah, must be a very holy Torah observant Jew, not just an Israelite. The moshiach is to be the chosen servant by which Yehowah was to shepherd His people - the children of Abraham and all those that convert or submit to the faith of  Judaism, just like David did, Hezekiah did and Josiah did in their time. The difference between the messiah with these three kings is that none of the three kings was "like Moses," let alone being greater than Moses. For the prophets foretold that the messiah would be a prophet-king, who would far exceed the awesomeness and leadership of Moses. Not only this, but David, Hezekiah and Josiah were only confined to the land of Canaan and possibly a little beyond that, but the foretold messiah would rule the whole entire earth and that all those that are not found practicing Judaism when he arrives shall be destroyed by him. This is so that the practitioners of Judaism will be at rest from all their enemies, which is anyone and everyone not practicing  Judaism. Thus, at that time, there will be true and genuine peace, because all of Israel's enemies shall be dead. Again, the messiah of Judaism is only a person that is appointed by the God of Israel to shepherd Yehowah's people in the ways He desires. This, is why David refers to King Saul as a moshiach. Because Saul was to shepherd His people and make sure they were always keeping the ways of Yehowah, not that he was allowed to do his own agenda. In 1 Samuel 24:6 we can see an example of what I mean, "And he [David] said unto his men, Yehowah forbid that I should do this thing unto my master, Yehowah's anointed [meshiach], to stretch forth mine hand against him." A 'moshiach' was never viewed as the God of Israel, nor did such a thought ever enter into the minds of the ancient Israelites, because all messiahs [those who have been "anointed" like Saul and David] and thee very "prophecied" messiah are mere servants of the Great God of Israel and are His special agents. 

Now I would like to move on to another aspect about the moshiach that I only touched on before. I said just awhile ago that the predicted messiah, pre-existed as a spirit before being incerted into the conception process of when Joseph and Mariam came together sexually. Proof of this is found throughout the Jewish Bible, called the Tanach in Hebrew.

Another thing that sets the messiah apart from the other prophets is this: when a human being is conceived in the womb, the spirit of that person is literally created upon conception, but in regards to the moshiach - because he was made a lot earlier, being the very first of HaShem's works of old [Pro 8:22] he would actually be inserted into the conception process. Thus, this great servant of the God of Israel would become incarnate, not that the God of Israel Himself would be as mainstream christianity believes.

So, if you paid attention to what I just wrote, the  Father is the Only Eternal Spirit, while the moshiach is a separate and made spirit that has existed since the beginning [you will see the proof of this throughout this paper].

Now considering all that I have just said, if you come across the word: 'SPIRIT' in the Tanach it could be referring to either the moshiach or the God of Israel depending on what the context is, NOT that there is a third person called the "Spirit" as Trinitarians assume. Thus, the third person called the "Spirit" does not exist.

Again, here is Judaic doctrine: the God of Israel is the only Eternal Spirit, while the moshiach is a separate spirit that serves the God of Israel faithfully. The Eternal Spirit [The God of Israel] has thousands upon thousands of other faithful ministering spirits who are His servants. The difference, however, between the "moshiach spirit" and the other spirits is this: the other spirits [angels, cherubs, seraphs and...] were created, whereas the moshiach was somehow [the Tanach does not give the exact 'how'] made from the very body [not a human body, but a spiritual body in which humans were fashioned after] of the Ancient of Days [Daniel 7:10,13,14] by His awesome power. Not through His loins, where He would need a wife, rather this was done somehow by His great power and so the "moshiach spirit" is the only spirit that was "birth-ed" into existence from His actual body or being and was HIS first "begotten" son and His only "begotton" son [Pro 30:4]. This automatically made him a "prince" as in the "prince of peace [Isa 9:6]." I will expound on Isa 9:6 later, if you would like to see it now, please click here.

2. "Mainstream Christianity" teaches that Jesus was born from a virgin, based on the gospels of Matthew and Luke. The Gospel of John, however, does not proscribe to that idea or notion. This is because John 6:42 and the seventh chapter of John deals with the whole origin of his place of birth and by saying that he was conceived naturally by Joseph and Mary in Nazareth [John 6:42, 7,26b-27, 7:41,-42, 7:50-52], not Bethlehem, and that his very own brothers did not believe he was the moshiach [John 7:5]. Which is quite dumbfounding, because they would have also denied their mother's assertions of his conception when growing up and celebrating his birthday every year. Secondly, to stress what I just said, John 7 clearly points out that he was born in Nazareth, not Bethlehem. The doctrines of the Jewish prophets fit well into the narrative of John because according to them, the messiah must be the literal and physical son of King David by direct succession from his loins or physical seed - on the male side - like all children are when it comes to a family name. On a side note to this topic, keep in mind that when the angels produced children of their own after marrying women [Gen 6:2 & 6:4], those children had no direct link to Adam. They were literally a new breed. When the angels did it again after the flood [6:4], those children had no direct link to Noah as well. So in the same way, if the God of Israel by mere power impregnated a virgin Israelite woman, David wouldn't have any involvement with his birth, thus negating the promise given to him and this so-called "virgin born" person would have no legitimate right to the throne of David. In truth, according to the prophets, he must be from David's actual seed like I said, for here are some proof verses:

      I have made a covenant with my chosen, I have sworn unto David my servant,

       Thy seed will I establish for ever, and build up thy throne to all generations. - Ps 89-3:4

        My covenant will I not break, nor alter the thing that is gone out of my lips.

       Once have I sworn by my holiness that I will not lie unto David.

       His seed shall endure for ever, and his throne as the sun before Me.

       It shall be established for ever as the moon, and [as] a faithful witness in heaven. - Ps 89:34-37

       Yehowah hath sworn [in] truth unto David; He will not turn from it; Of the fruit of thy body will

       I set upon thy throne. - Ps 132:11

       And it came to pass that night, that the word of Yehowah came unto Nathan, saying:

       "Go and tell my servant David, 'Thus saith Yehowah, Shalt thou build me an house for me to dwell in?

      Whereas I have not dwelt in [any] house since the time that I brought up the children of Israel

      out of Egypt, even to this day, but have walked in a tent and in a tabernacle.

      In all [the places] wherein I have walked with all the children of Israel spake I a word with any

      of the tribes of Israel, whom I commanded to feed my people Israel, saying, Why build ye

      not me an house of cedar?' Now therefore so shalt thou say unto my servant David, 'Thus saith

      the Yehowah Tze-va-ot [The Eternal One among the hosts], I took thee from the sheepcote,

     from following the sheep, to be ruler over My people, over Israel:  And I was with thee

     whithersoever thou wentest, and have cut off all thine enemies out of thy sight, and have made

     thee a great name, like unto the name of the great [men] that [are] in the earth. Moreover I will

     appoint a place for my people Israel, and will plant them, that they may dwell in a place of their

     own, and move no more; neither shall the children of wickedness afflict them any more, as beforetime,

     Even since the time that I commanded judges [to be] over My people Israel, and have caused

     thee to rest from all thine enemies.' Furthermore, Yehowah telleth thee that He will make thee

     an house. And when thy days be fulfilled, and thou shalt sleep with thy fathers, I will set up

     thy seed after thee, which shall proceed out of thy bowels... ...and I will stablish the throne

     of his kingdom for ever.  - 2 Samuel 7:4-13.

     Commentary: when Nathan says, "I will establish the throne of his kingdom..." it is very clear that it is not

the kingdom of the God of heaven upon the earth, rather it is the kingdom belonging to one of David's many descendants. Secondly, it is clear that the descendant is not the God of Israel, as erroneous Trinitarians like to assume, because they do not know Jewish writings. Instead of reading what our holy texts actually say they prefer to listen to the false doctrines that their misinformed preachers and apologists spew out -because they think that our sole patron God, Yehowah, is some tri-being, thus they think Jesus is "God" on earth and then assume that the kingdom of the God of Heaven and the kingdom of the moshiach are the same thing. Another thing I would like to point out is this, as Yehowah was in heaven when this prophecy came to Nathan, it is very clear that He will remain there when He establishes this great kingdom for David's descendant, just like He was when this prophecy went out.

     Lastly, in opposition to the proponents of the "virgin birth," they have 'missed the mark' in regards to the two-fold reason behind the Covenant of Circumcision that was given to Abraham. The two reasons are these: Yehowah, the sole God of Abraham, promised him on oath that through his seed he would be patriarch to multitudes of people and to kings as well; And, secondly, from his very loins would come the great prophet - hero, called the moshiach, who would rule the whole earth in righteousness according to the laws of Yehowah, the Torah. Because of this oath, Yehowah commanded Abraham to circumcise everyone that would be born from him and all those that would dwell with him so that when Abraham and his descendants would look upon their flesh they would be reminded that through Abraham's seed these things would be. Thus, the moshiach must be conceived in a natural fashion, being a direct descendant of this holy man and prophet named Abraham.

    This is why the Gospel of John fits more into Judaic theology than does Matthew and Luke, because the author of John writes that Jesus was born in Nazareth, and born naturally from Joseph and Mary.  Moreover, everyone knew that, as we can clearly see in John 1:45, 6:42 and chapter 7. Lastly, only Matthew quotes Isaiah 7:14 as 'proof' for the virgin birth, whereas Luke is silent about any prophecy of such things. Although theologians, apologists and preachers will glue the two accounts together; thus, applying Matthew's reference to Luke's narrative, even though they are completely different accounts and narratives. Yet, when you take a look at the context of the prophecy which Matthew extracts his reference from, this prophecy and this chapter of Isaiah has nothing to do with the messiah. Rather, it was a sign that came to pass during the  reign of Ahaz, around 738 BCE. If the proponents of the virgin birth would simply do their homework and confirm whether or not a referenced passage is valid or not and not be so gullible to believe just in anything, they could see for themselves that the child E-ma-nu-el [Immanuel] had to be born before Rezin [King of Aram] and Pekah [King of Israel] were slain. This is because the prophecy states that before the child would discern the difference between right and wrong these two kings would be dead: "He will eat curds and honey until [GWT Bible & the Hebrew Masoretic Text] he knows how to reject evil and choose good. Yet, before the child shall know to refuse the evil, and choose the good, the land whose two kings thou hast a horrifying concern over shall [soon be lacking them]." I had to paraphrase to give the full thought behind the Hebrew word. This prophecy came to pass when the mighty King of Assyria invaded Aram and Hoshea murdered Pekah.

The last thing I would like to comment on is the FACT that the two virgin birth narratives are radically different from each other.

  1. According to the Gospel of Matthew, Joseph and Mary were residents of Bethlehem [Matt 2:11] and lived together after Joseph married Mary [Matt 1:24]. It was while they were married residents of Bethlehem that  Mary had Jesus in Bethlehem. Yet, according to Luke's account they were residents of Nazareth [Luke 3:4-5] and because of a "tax" they went to Bethlehem to be "registered." Likewise, according to Luke, they were not married when Mary had Jesus, but were only betrothed [Luke 2:5].

  2. They both agree that Jesus was conceived while Herod was King of Judea [Matt 2:1 and Luke 1:5]. Yet, they apparently disagree when it comes to his birth. According to Matthew, Herod was still alive when Jesus was born [Matt 2:1 & 2:16], but according to Luke 2:1, Herod was apparently dead by the time Jesus was born, because of his lack of mentioning him again after Mary's nine month pregnancy, yet he mentioned a "Syrian," named Cyrenius.

  3. Where did this family go after Jesus' birth?

   Well, according to Luke's gospel, after 40 days passed from Jesus' birth [Luke 2:21-22 & Lev 12:2-4] they went back to their hometown of Nazareth [Luke 2:39]. Yet, according to Matthew they abandoned Israel altogether and headed off to Egypt [Matt 2:13] until Herod died in 4 BCE [Matt 2:15 & 2:19]. It was then they wanted to go back to Bethlehem [Matt 2:21-22] their hometown, but because of the threat of Archelaus they kept going and went to Nazareth instead [Matthew 2:22-24].

These are very stark differences, not just little typos from a scribe. They are completely different narratives. Likewise, don't forget what I said already, John's gospel totally counters these two gospels. Again, to show you one more stark difference between John's account with the two virgin birth narratives, it is this: According to Luke's account Jesus and John are cousins [Luke 1:36] and Elizabeth clearly knows that the child in Mary's womb is the moshiach [Luke 1:41-43]. Because of this one can logically assume that John would learn through Elizabeth his mom that his cousin was the moshiach. Yet, according to John the Baptist himself, according to gospel of John, he does not know him before his baptism [John 1:31 & 1:33], nor after his baptism - not by name that is, for this is why John the Baptist only refers to him as "'the lamb' of the God of Israel" and why John and Andrew never refer to him as Jesus, but only "Rabbi [John 1:38]." Another thing I would like to point out is that according to John, Jesus does not have a following when he is baptized by John, but that John and Andrew are his first disciples.  This is significant, because if he is already known to be the legendary hero, prophet and future king - the messiah, John would see those crowds and people would be following him already. Yet, this is exactly what the two virgin birth narratives promote. According the two virgin birth narratives, many people know that he is the messiah right at his birth and in some cases even before his birth, like Elizabeth. Yet, according to John the prophet - the Baptist, the Gospel of John proclaims that the reason why John was sent to baptize folks was so that the moshiach would be pronounced at any given time during his prophetic time period. Thus, when Yehowah fell upon Jesus, like He did with David and many other righteous men in the past, Jesus turned into this "great" man at that very point.

Again John parallels Judaism, where Matthew and Luke do not!

  

3. Judaism teaches that some of the laws Moses and the other prophets received and taught shall last forever, while others shall only last to the day of judgment. Likewise, they taught that all men must do them for the Jewish concepts of 'salvation [Num 15:16-17, Ezekiel 18, Isa 56:6-7, Psalm 119:155 and Exodus 32:31-33 and...].' All four gospels teach this and that all men must do them [Matt 19:17, 23;1-3, 23:23, 24:20, John 15:10 and...]. Paul, however, of whom mainstream christianity follows taught that the law was literally eradicated [Eph 2:11-15; Col 2:14, "Blotting out the handwriting of ordinances;" and plenty of other passages from Paul's writings.].

4. Judaism doesn't teach "life after death," but only "life after the resurrection." Thus, according to Judaism when one dies, his spirit is asleep [yet without dreams, so one does not even know they exist] wherever his body lies. This will remain this way until the resurrection, at that point the God of Israel shall let the messiah judge all men [Daniel 12:2, Isa 38:18-19, Ps 6:5, Ecc 9:5 & 9:10, Job 3:13-19 & 14:7-12]. John's gospel teaches this [John 11:11-14 & 11:24]. The other gospels and Paul taught the opposite of Judaism [Matt 17:4 because of Moses being present; Luke 16:19-31, 23:43, 2 Cor 5:6-8 and...]

5.And.... The  are many other things but let me finally move on...

So remember what I said,  if you are  going  to  pick up  these  Jewish /  Hebrew  writings,   a collection of  books  to form  a  single book called the "Tanach [an acronym for T=Torah, N=Navim = the prophets, Ch=Chatovim = the writings]" in Hebrew, you  are going to be given the viewpoint of that ancient or primitive theocratic culture. The people of this culture preached that they alone and all those that accepted their way of thinking and beliefs were only folks that knew the real truth. Whatever they taught that might "seem" legendary, must also be accepted, like: angels sleeping with women; people talking with animals; miracles; the Red Sea splitting and that a whole nation passed through on dry ground; that there will be a day of judgment by a holy agent for the God of Israel called the messiah.

  Keep in mind with these viewpoints, this ancient theocratic society judged  or deemed that Judaism is THEEEE very faith and only faith that was given by heaven itself, as we see HaShem talking  with Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Moses, Samuel, David, Jeremiah  and.... Therefore, we should only look to the words of the Prophets to see what  they  have  said  in the name of HaShem concerning who the  true  moshiach is,  and  what  he  was  like,  and  Who

                                    ----------------[PAGE 1 WHEN PRINTED]----------------

the real God of Israel is. Judaism has NEVER taught that the moshiach is the God of Israel in any shape or fashion; instead, it teaches that he is the greatest of all those that observe the Torah, of all the prophets and all those that teach holiness and righteousness. Along with these things, Judaism teaches that he will be the world's finest historian, because authentic biblical Judaism teaches that he was there at the very beginning of creation, thus he would have the ability to tell or teach many wonderful things.

    Furthermore, the doctrine of the trinity was invented by non-Jews around 110 CE/AD in or around the land that is known today as Turkey. Namely, people like Ignatius of Antioch, Irenius of Lyons, Tertullian of Carthage [who coined the term, "Trinity"], Eusebius of Caesarea and others. These non-Jews could not understand our Jewish scriptures, nor were they really inspired to read them after the original 11 apostles died off. This was because the people who believed in Jesus became highly tainted with falsehood, lies and deceiving doctrines. This is mainly because Paul taught the opposite of Jesus and his original apostles [Click here to see the proof] by saying that the Torah was done away with. And, because of the popularity and simpleness of Paul's message it won a great amount of converts that had no formal education of Judaism, which Judaism demands on all the children of Israel so that they all would be sound in the tenents of the faith. Yet, with popularity comes welding power and Pauline believers out numbered the Judaic believers like James [the brother of Jesus] and all those like James [See Acts 21:17-22]. The non-educated ones that believed in the simplistic Pauline way to 'life' invented all sorts of anti-Jewish beliefs and made those beliefs a part of their local congregations or "churches." Well, in the process of time these same types of people wrote their own writings or gospels and incorporated their anti-Jewish beliefs within the life and actions of Jesus, the great Orthodox Jewish man from Nazareth. Over time, these same Pauline believers that branched off into their own sect even took Paul's writings and manipulated them to reflect their non-Judaic worldview. For even though Paul was considered to be a heretic in his day, because of his anti-torah or anti-law teaching, he still maintained the theology of Judaism concerning the messiah which teaches the messiah is neither divine, nor eternal, but a made being and a part of this creation. Evidence of early manuscripts shows these manipulations that these "Pauline offshoots" did to negate what Paul taught, yet reflected their teachings. I will give a clear example in a moment. These "offshoots," because of their popularity and power, they became the dominate force of those times, they were the first 'Catholics,' which would mutate into far more vile and idolatrous Catholic movement you now see.

Most of the non-Israeli believers in Jesus  did not end up like the people that Paul describes in his epistle 'to the Galatians." For according to this very epistle they turned their back on Paul and judged him as an apostate and started doing what the prophets of Israel said in places like Numbers 15 and Isaiah 56 which states that "you shall have one law for the native Israeli and the stranger." Thus, they started circumcising their children as the God of Israel commanded and keeping all of the Torah verses heeding the words of a mere man. For they judged Yehowah greater than Paul. Likewise, according to Deut 13, Paul fit the very description of a false preacher and prophet. For in Deut 13 it says, even if a man performs a miracle or gives a sign and it comes to pass, yet teaches against the law of Moses you are to ignore that preacher or prophet, for their are false prophets. So good for them.  However, as I said, most non-Israelis did not end up this way. Because of this they never came to know what the tenents of Judaism are and so became worse and worse in their ignorance. Whereas, those that followed people like James kept the Torah all of the time.

For as we  see in other places such as Acts 21; Matthew 5:17-20, 7:21-23, 19:17, 23:1-23, 24:20; and Zech 14; and John 14:21; and Revelation 12:17 and many other places that the torah is eternal and will NEVER be done away with.

    This article will prove that Yehoshua is not 'God,' but only his Father is the 'Everlasting One' or 'the God of Israel.' It will even prove, by Jesus' own words that he never claimed that he is "God in the flesh" contrary to what the mainstream teaches. In fact, it will teach that he outright denied being "the God of Heaven." It will prove that the Trinity doctrine is entirely false and was in fact fabricated by the Pauline disciples that did not know Jewish tenents, who ended up being the early catholics, who influenced the rest of history as we [scholars, historians and the educated in these matters] know it.

This is not a "slam" by any means, BUT practically all 100% of so-called of modern "Christianity" is "Catholic" in nature. When I say, 'Catholic' I am speaking of the early catholics between 50 CE -250AD, not the modern "Roman Catholic Church," or those like them, like the "Greek Orthodox Church," the "Russian Orthodox Church," the Armenian Church and so forth. This is because practically every tenent they promote goes against the Teachings of the Israeli prophets found in the Jewish bible. Keep in mind that during the days of Jesus and his apostles ONLY the writings of the Hebrew prophets were considered "Scriptures."

    Now to fellow Jews, this article proves that there is just one God without any triune nature, as you already correctly believe, unlike what so-called 'Christians' have been trying to convert you to throughout the ages. Nonetheless, the Tanach shows the "dualism" that you are missing, by writing off the pluralism of particular words for just mere monotheism, because of the lack of understanding the scriptures. When in fact, the Tanach teaches the moshiach's existence and works long before he ever becomes the son of David. The Tanach also proves that David himself prayed to him, long before Solomon was even born, in whose son he must also be.

What you will read is according to actual Biblical Judaism found in the actual book, not according to the sages that invented 'Rabbinical' Judaism within the last 2,000 years. These sages have actually led the children of Abraham away from their genuine ancestral faith for a long time, because of their oral traditions.

Please Read:

                                    ----------------[PAGE 2 WHEN PRINTED]----------------

ELOHIM (אלהים)

What is this word in Biblical Judaism?

IT IS THE PLURAL FORM OF ELOH,

YET WHATEVER THIS WORD MEANS

ONLY ONE OF THOSE ELOHs IS 'THE GOD OF ISRAEL'

TWO MAIN RULERS IN BIBLICAL JUDAISM

THE KING OF PEACE OR "THE ANCIENT OF DAYS  - DANIEL 7:13

AND

HIS SON - PRO 30:4,

ANY SON OF A MONARCH IS A PRINCE, HE THEREFORE, IS KNOWN AS

"THE PRINCE OF PEACE" - ISAIAH 9:6

THESE TWO MAIN INDIVIDUALS

ARE TWO SEPARATE SPIRITS

AND ARE VERY HOLY

The LORD [Yehowah] said to my   Lord [adonai: master / rabbi / sir],

"Sit thou at My right hand until I make your enemies your footstool - Psalm 110

TWO MAKERS OF THE UNIVERSE

"IN THE BEGINNING [THE] ELOHIM CREATED..." - Gen 1:1

"LET US (MORE THAN ONE ELOH) MAKE" - Gen 1:26

"I was the master craftsman at His side" - Proverbs 8:30

TWO THRONES IN HEAVEN

"SIT AT MY RIGHT HAND" - Psalm 110

SIT ON WHAT?

WHAT IS THE MEANING OF SCRIPTURE WHEN IT TELLS US THAT WITHIN SOME VERSES THERE IS MORE THAN ONE "LORD" EXISTING? YET, THERE ARE NEVER MORE THAN TWO OF THEM THAT ARE TALKED ABOUT? LIKEWISE, IT TELLS US THAT THESE TWO LORDS ARE TOTALLY SEPARATE FROM EACH OTHER AND ARE OBVIOUSLY NOT THE SAME PERSON, NOR RANK (AS PEOPLE ARE IN A MILITARY)???

1) ONE "LORD" IS THE FATHER, HE IS THE ONLY GOD IN EXISTENCE -

HIS HOLY NAME IS YEHOWAH

2) THE SECOND lord/master IS THE FATHER’S SON, THE PRINCE OF THE UNIVERSE OR

PRINCE OF PEACE, NOT THE KING OF PEACE, THE MOSHIACH / MESSIAH / CHRIST, YEHOSHUA (JESUS) (even YEHOWAH II ). HE IS

   NOT "GOD," NOR A GOD, BUT WAS ACTUALLY BROUGHT INTO EXISTENCE LIKE THE ANGELS WERE YET BEING THE FIRSTBORN OF ALL CREATION OR ALL THAT CAME INTO BEING, HE WAS AND IS THE FIRST AND ALSO THE LAST THAT

THE FATHER HIMSELF MADE, ALL ELSE CAME THROUGH him.

JESUS IS THE MOST HIGHEST RANKING, THE MOST 

  POWERFUL SPIRIT THERE IS BELOW THE ONE AND ONLY GOD OF HEAVEN -  WHO

IS "THE ANCIENT OF DAYS (DANIEL 7:13)"

"YEHOWAH said to my  master / rabbi / adonai,

'Sit thou at MY right hand until I make your enemies a footstool for your feet' " - Psalm 110:1

Definitions:

El:  אל -  (Where 'Elohim' comes from) is a Hebrew word commonly translated to English and other languages from the Jewish scriptures as “God”, or “god”, or “a god". However, this is not accurate. Rather,  according to the Jewish scriptures and Judaic mindset or worldview an 'el' is simply a "mighty one," or referring to "one that is great."  It is not reserved exclusively for the God of the Jewish people, because they themselves use the word in various ways and for different individuals. In Psalm 8:5, the Psalmist uses "elohim" in reference to the "heavenly hosts." Then Ezekiel uses the word, 'elohim' to refer to the 'mighty' troops of King Nebuchadnezzar when he came against or was about to come against Jerusalem. Moses uses the word, 'elohim' to refer to the judges of Israel, this is because they were given 'great or mighty' power and authority over the people. There are several other ways 'elohim' is used in the Jewish Bible [Tanach]. Simply put however, an 'el' doesn't mean "God" or 'a god' at all, but a individual that is mighty or great. Thus, it obviously includes the God of Israel, but this word is not exclusively reserved for Him. With that being said, I hope you can see that the word "el" does not necessarily mean eternal, in the sense of "always was" or "always will be," nor does it mean "divine, because it's definition includes those who have been made.

    Because translators and readers assume[d] that the God of Israel alone created the heavens and the earth, they have been translating the plural word 'elohim,' as a singular word, "God," for centuries. So when you read passages like Genesis 1:1 it reads erroneously like this [let's use the King James Bible]: "In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth." On top of this ill-translation there is another plural word in this passage, being 'heavens,' yet they did not translate this correctly either. Thus, it should read something like this, "In the beginning the mighty ones created also the heavens and also the earth." The word 'also' is in the Hebrew text as well. So the BIG question is, who were the "mighty ones" that created the heavens and the earth. Some Jewish commentators think that the God of Israel asked the angels things, though this is not the case. For according to Job 38 the angels did not participate, but only cheered to what was going on, "Where were you when I laid the foundations of the earth? ...When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of 'elohim' shouted for joy." Here again the word 'elohim' is used, yet it is very clear that whoever "they" are suppose to be, it doesn't include the angels. Yet, if you keep reading in Genesis 1, namely verse 26, it says, "Let us make." So who is the "us" in this passage? We will answer this in a moment...

    The translators of the Jewish Bible should have translated the words in a virbatim matter, for if they did their version would give a totally different reality. The problem is that even the Jewish translators do the same thing, because they reasoned within themselves and to their fellow peers, "Who can 'create' except for our God?"   That question is what this article is all about. In turn from knowing the truth, they came up with the idea it 'must' mean, "plentitude of might." For they have not even concieved the thought that possibly the Holy God of Israel has made a special and particular spirit and servant so powerful that he has the ability to create things from literally nothing, for that is how the God of Israel made him. Not at random moments at his choosing, but only under the strict directions of his God, the Holy God of Israel.

    In the biblical Hebrew culture, and according to the Biblical religion, there is just One Being that "always was" or that has never had a beginning. This Being or Spirit is the "Ancient of Days." We can see this name being used in Daniel 7:9. He, obviously, is an "El," because He is extremely mighty. In fact, He is known as "The Almighty." With this Everlasting El , however, there abides with Him another "el" that does have a beginning point. This particular 'el' was made by the Ancient of Days Himself. He was made to have similar abilities to the Ancient One and so was made in His image and likeness. This el, is His physical son, and this son of His was the first of all that has come into existence. When this occurred the Ancient of Days became a Father and this el that came into existence before anything else was and is His only begotten son.

One might ask or say at this point, 'How can you say this when mainstream Judaism doesn't teach that the God of Israel has a son; Christianity makes those outragous statements?"

  With that I will tell them to read the words of a very little known prophet in the Jewish Bible, a man by the name of Agur. Only four verses are dedicated to him, but what he says is very powerful to answer this question. These four verses are found in Proverbs 30:1-4:

  

Now since this el that was made, Jesus or Yehoshua, is His son, it is clear that he is a prince and this is why we call him the "Prince of Peace", and not the "King of Peace."

    As mentioned, because Yehoshua or this lesser el was the first of all that has come into existence, it is then clear he was here before the heavens and earth, the angels and the light of the first day and even the waters that were brought into existence, just moments before that light. Jesus is the first. So, because Yehoshua is an el, the Father let him bring everything that does, and did exist (some animals and plants are extinct), into existence. This is why when you read Genesis you will read, "In the beginning the El-s (Elohim) created also the heavens and also the earth." Thus when you finally come across Gen 1:26 "Let us make mankind as us" and they simply made two people, it should then be very clear to you that there are simply two main or unique els in all of existence. However, one El never had a beginning and is "the Everlasting One", whereas the lesser el was made by the Everlasting El. So, when you read Genesis 2 you should be able to understand the relationship of the Father and the Son through the stories of Adam and Eve. For Adam was there first, then after awhile Eve came and was made in the image or form of Adam with similar abilities, basically a human. Yet, it is through Eve that mankind is given birth, just as it is through Yehoshua that all existence comes. As Eve is weaker than Adam, so is the made el weaker than the El that never had a beginning. Likewise, as Eve must submit to her husband, so must the son submit to his Father, or the prince to the King that has all authority.

                                    ----------------[PAGE 4 WHEN PRINTED]----------------

-im:  ים-   this is a suffix that indicates the pluralism regarding things, people and places, and this is the pronunciation of its Hebrew dialect. And so some words are written with this ending when translated from Hebrew to English when there is no fitting word in the English language to indicate the same thing in the English world. Thus it is the same as the English -s to designate something as being plural or more than one. As: Cherub/Cherubim (Ezekiel 10:1) or Seraph/Seraphim (Isaiah 6:6).

Now regarding the word: “Elohim  אלהים”, this is the plural form of Eloh (1 Kings 18:36 to those that have access to a Hebrew bible), thus meaning there is more than one Eloh. If you do not have the original Scriptures regarding 1 Kings 18:36 the translated version might just read “God of Abraham.” Now a shorter version of “Eloh” is just plain “El”.

This is what the Scriptures teach:

   You must assert,(believe and teach), that only two el-s (“Elohim  אלהים” is plural for Eloh (or El in its shorter version)), or Lords, or high-ranking SPIRITS are existing. For this is what the scriptures are telling us. It tells us that these two el-s are totally separate from each other, as you are separate from your neighbor, in every way. However, one El, (the Father) is greater than the other el, (the son, Jesus), because the one El (the Father) made the other, and when He made him, He did not give him equal power, for that is one thing the only God cannot do, because He is eternal where all He makes or can make has a beginning point and those things or individuals would never know the mind of Yehowah.. For it is written, "For He 'has put everything under his feet.' Now when it says that 'everything' has been put under him, it is clear that this does not include God Himself, Who put everything under Christ. When He has done this, then the Son himself will be made subject to Him Who put everything under him, so that God may be all in all (1 Corinthians 15:27-28)". This is the same regarding Jesus’ knowledge as well, for it is written, "No one knows about that day or hour, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father (Matthew 24:36)," this also makes it clear that the legend "Jesus is in all places at the same time" is debunked. That is, as far as the past and the future are concerned. For if this were the case he would know the exact day and hour he was returning. However, to prove that he can be in/at all places and people at the same time, (though he is not and will not be, because he does not dwell in evil people or non-believers), in the present only let's look at scripture. It is written, "If anyone loves me, he will obey my teaching. My Father will love him, and we will come to him and make our home with him [thus proving this, if there is more than one disciple in the world] (John 14:23)", and "For where two or three come together in my name, there am I with them [thus proving it again, if there should be more than one group praying at the same time in the world] (Matthew 18:20)". However, these two verses only pertain to his glorified state, not his manhood state, because when it was time for him to become a man, the Father annulled his glory and his power and 'el' abilities or qualities, thus he was no longer an 'el' or the semi-all knowing and semi-omnipresent spirit, for He caused him to become a man, for it is written, "You sent me into the world (John 17:18)". And also, "I am not here on my own, but He who sent me (John 7:28)," and "You caused him to be less rank than the heavenly beings (Psalm 8:5)," "You heard me say, 'I am going away and I am coming back to you.' If you loved me, you would be glad that I am going to the Father, for the Father is greater than I," and so because of this statement alone he says, "Unless I go away, the counselor (that counselor being he himself in his glorified state) will not come to you" and so he says, "you know him, for he

                                    ----------------[PAGE 5 WHEN PRINTED]----------------

now lives with you and shall be in you. So I will not leave you as orphans; I will return to you." For the scriptures are clear by stating that as long as he is a man he cannot be in all places at the same time, and because of this he can not also dwell in mankind, and if he is not dwelling in them neither is the Father. Now understand this: if a demon can enter a man and dwell in them how much easier can an 'el' dwell in you? So if the 'most high' of all creation dwells in you and the Eternal EL can dwell in the 'most high,' since the 'most high' is made, then it is clear that if Jesus dwells in you, then also his God, the only God, the God of Israel.

    However, whether the Father and Yehoshua dwell in you, or not, this has nothing to do with one’s salvation. For salvation is based solely on if you accept that Jesus is the only begotten son, ("For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life, (John 3:16)). However this verse is only in the context if you obey him while obviously believing in him, not just by simply believing in him as pagan preachers say. Yehoshua/Jesus himself is the one that made the heavens and the earth and all that is in them,  (“Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made (John 1:3)” and “For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him (Colossians 1:16)). He was then dis-ranked to the status of a man, ("You caused him to be dis-ranked below the heavenly beings" (Psalm 8:5)), by the awesome power of the Father. He was sent by the Father, slain and was resurrected on the third day by the same Father, and then ascended into heaven and now sits at the right hand of the Father on his own throne as the Prince of the Universe, ("The LORD (Yehowah) said unto my lord (adon), Sit thou at My right hand, until I make thine enemies thy footstool" (Psalm 110:1)), and he shall come again to judge the living, and those that died after he resurrects them. You must also be baptized, ("Whoever believes and is baptized will be saved" (Mark 16:16)). You also must obey his commands that he spoke unto Moses at Mt. Sinai, and to his prophets and that he himself gave while on earth, and through his apostles and prophets of today. You must also obey the personal commands that he gives us ("Now a man came up to Jesus and asked, "Teacher, what good thing must I do to get eternal life?" “If you want to enter life, obey the commandments (Matthew 19:16-17)"). He also did this with Jonah when he called him to go and preach a message of repentance and obedience in Nineveh. All of that which Jesus says is simply relayed to us by his God, Yehowah, the Only God, for he only speaks of what he hears, ("These words you hear are not my own; they belong to the Father who sent me (John 14:24)”).

    Therefore, regarding the scriptures pertaining to him regaining his power and glory and the Father causing him to be an 'el' again, the scripture says, "And now, Father, glorify me in Your Presence with the glory I had with You before the world began (John 17:5)," and also, "In my vision at night I looked, and there before me was one like a son of man (Yehoshua being prophesied about by Daniel where Acts leaves off), coming with the clouds of heaven. He approached the Ancient of Days and was led into His presence. He was given authority, glory and sovereign power (thus indicating he lacked it before this moment, (but not before he was in the womb of Mary, as the previous verse mentions) (Daniel 7:13-14))" and, "You crowned him with glory and honor (Psalm 8:5)". The original statement also makes it clear that he does not know the mind of God. This is regarding the time of his own coming which he does not know, but only the Father knows, (Matthew 24:36). Thus, the Most High's knowledge is obviously limited.

    Saying that the Most High's knowledge is limited, gives rise to the doctrine that he can only know all knowledge pertaining to what is going on in the present. He also knows what went on in the past, but he can possibly forget what he learned, for it is written, "And  אלהים  remembered Noah and all the wild animals and the livestock that were with him (Genesis 8:1)".Moreover, Revelation 20:12 says, "The dead were judged according to what they

                                    ----------------[PAGE 6 WHEN PRINTED]----------------

had done as recorded in the books". Also, he knew the thoughts of all before he became a man and he now knows the thoughts of all. But, he does not know the thoughts of He who is in greater rank than himself, and no one is this, but the Father only. Therefore, what Yehoshua does know of the future has been told to him by the Father.

    When he was a man, he no longer knew the thoughts of men. Nor did he know the thoughts of any spirit that was less in rank than he, (such as an angel, cherub, etc.), before the Father caused him to be a man. When he did know the thoughts of men, while he himself was a man, it was because they were revealed to him by the Father; as so it was with the prophets of the past and present. He, (the Father), likewise did not give him sustaining power, or rule, so that he can do whatever he desires without the fear of being condemned himself. For he is not the ultimate Being and Judge, (for Jesus is the Father's greatest servant). Thus, he is similar to us men in that, if we do not obey the son, whom will only speak of what he hears from the Father, we will be condemned.  Thus, he is no greater than us men in that regard, for he says this concerning himself, "just as I have obeyed my Father's commands and so remain in His love (John 15:10)", and what I just mentioned regarding him, "the Son himself will be made subject to Him". However, the Son has always been subject to Him, since the day he was made. This means he too can be condemned to hell if he falls or turns away from these commands, and this statement alone tells us he is not the law giver. We gather this,even though in John 8:58 he claims to be the very one to be giving the Law to Moses on Mt. Sinai, for he says, "Verily, verily, I say to you, before Abraham was, I AM." This is referring to Exodus 3:13-14, when Moses asks the lord his name, in case his brothers should ask who is sending him to lead the Israelites out of Egypt. The response is, "I AM THAT I AM: and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I AM hath sent me unto you," thus also saying though he gave the law, even at Sinai and greatly enforced it and still does, he claims he is not the one that made it, but that he is just a mere messenger of the One that is the Judge.

    The story in chapter two of Genesis is a hidden truth into what actually occurred during the days of eternity, before the first part of creation was ever started. Jesus was the first of all His works, in fact he also is the only, and thus, being the last of what His hands have made. This is what is meant when he says, "I am the First and the Last and the Firstborn of all creation and that has been made (in a paraphrase form)," for it is written, "he is the likeness of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. However, by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him. He is before all things and in him all things hold together (Colossians 1:15-17, this by the way is the only thing I accept from Paul, which this of all things he should get right since he was a Pharisee)." Chapter 2 of Genesis says this in a paraphrase form, "He made the man from the dust of the ground, then later, after he named all the animals, he then caused the man to go into a deep sleep in which he took a rib from his side and formed a woman out of it. Thus, making her from him and because of this they were the same essence and flesh and she was made in the image of the man." And so he, as I mentioned above, was made in "the image of the invisible God". Proverbs 8 expounds on this by saying, "The LORD made me as the first of His works, before His deeds of old; I was made during eternity, before the beginning, before the world began. When there were no oceans, I was given existence, when there were no springs abounding with water; before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given existence, before He made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world." So, as Eve was made (not created), so the Son was made, not created and so, Proverbs 8 proves that he was never eternal, and that he was made from His Essence and Spirit, as Eve was from Adam’s own flesh. He only made two humans, male and female and the lesser came from the essence of the original, and the lesser was made in the image of the original. These two were given the authority to govern all in this realm as those TWO have authority over their realm and all realms; so we humans are analogous to them. This is the  meaning  of  Genesis  Chapters  1

                                    ----------------[PAGE 7 WHEN PRINTED]----------------

and 2  when it says, "Let US make mankind as US". And what is mankind? Only a male and female, two individuals (not three to go against the pagan Trinitarians and not just one), yet these two were of the same essence.

    These two spirits (Yehowah and the Most High (Jesus) interact with each other to glorify each other. And not a single man can know either of them unless they act together, for it is written: "no one knows the Father except the Son and those to whom the Son chooses to reveal Him (Matthew 11:27)." The same goes for the other, "No one knows the Son except the Father [and] no one can come to me unless the Father Who sent me draws him (John 6:44, Matthew 11:27)". In Matthew 16, we see the Father revealing Jesus, "When Jesus came to the region of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples, 'Who do people say the Son of Man is?' They replied, 'Some say John the Baptist; others say Elijah; and still others, Jeremiah or one of the prophets.' 'But what about you?' he asked. 'Who do you say I am?' Simon Peter answered, 'You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.' Jesus replied, 'Blessed are you, Simon Peter son of Jonah, for this was not revealed to you by man, but by my Father in heaven (Matthew 16:13-17).'" The story of Joseph and Pharaoh is also an allegory into what was going to occur with the Son of Man in the future, and it also states that there are only two individuals involved. One is greater than the other, yet all must honor the other (the Son) to have favor from the greater, for it is written, "he who honors me, honors the One who sent me." Also, as mentioned earlier about Christ, the same is true concerning this story. The one (Joseph) will be made subject to the one (Pharaoh) who put everything under him, for it says, "You shall be in charge of my palace, and all my people are to submit to your orders. Only with respect to the throne will I be greater than you (Genesis 41:40)". Thus, scripture is clear in saying that there are only two Individuals, and no more and no less than that. Therefore, he who believes that there is just one El in existence transgresses. And also, he who believes in one God according to pagan Trinitarians, thus meaning is 'the Father, Son and Spirit' also transgresses and commits idolatry for such a God does not exist, but that is a false doctrine which was turned into creed at the Nicene Council in 325 AD. The Father and His son are separate Beings, and one, (the Son) must obey the Other, (the Father) or he himself will be judged like any other sinner, whether angel or human; yet all spirits, humans and all of creation is subject to him. This is because he is a Prince and so, a lord and yet all are made by him. Moreover, mankind is not able to be honored, loved and given salvation by the Father unless we honor and obey this Prince, His son. The son will not speak willfully on his own, thus the words he speaks are messages from the Father. This is why he says, "If you obey me, you (automatically) obey my Father for the words that I speak are not my own, but the Father's, whom has sent me." Make no mistake about it, when the scriptures and he himself states that he and the Father are one, he is stating that they are in accordance with each other, or allied with each other. Understand this, the scripture also states, "I pray also for those who will believe in me through their (my disciples) message, that all of them may be one - that they may be one as we are one - and brought to complete unity (John 17:20-23)". Thus as we humans are not the same person, they to are separate people or different el-s. Remember that Jesus is a far cry from Yehowah, because Jesus was made, thus he very limited, even though no one can compare to him that has come into being.

     What more shall I say about this? Abraham was given a promise that through his firstborn son, Isaac, he would become the parent of many nations, and that his offspring would be like the stars in the sky for multitude. Yet while Isaac was still a boy and not yet married, nor did he yet have children of his own, Abraham was commanded to sacrifice him, his firstborn son. Yet, if he were to do this, how would He fulfill his promise to him, that through Isaac, Abraham would become this mighty parent? So, as he was told to do, Abraham went up to Mount Moriah and there was going to sacrifice his promised son, the very one that would bring about Abraham's glory. However, when Abraham left his two servants, he told them, "Stay here with the donkey while I and the boy go over there. We will worship and then we will come back to you (Genesis 22:5)." Thus, indicating that Abraham considered

                                    ----------------[PAGE 8 WHEN PRINTED]----------------

what was promised to him and understood that He would not lie to him. Therefore, he understood He would either intervene, as stated when he spoke words of faith again, "Isaac spoke up and said to his father Abraham, "Father?" "Yes, my son?" Abraham replied. "The fire and the wood are here," Isaac said, "but where is the lamb for the burnt offering?" Abraham answered, "God Himself will provide the lamb." Or, that He would simply resurrect him from the dead. Yet, regardless of the case Abraham put his trust in the One who gave the promise in order to fulfill it. This story is also a great allegory to what was going to occur in the future concerning the Father (the eternal El) and a son (the made el)

    Do you see that there are only two individuals mentioned in this story? Also, this is the allegory concerning them: The Father would take His only Son, the promised Son, the one that would sit on the throne of David, even after being promised that he would ascend to heaven itself and be given back his glory that he had with Him before He caused him to become a man. As I mentioned earlier, he would sit at the right hand of the Father as a prince, for he is just a mere son, and if he were to sit at His right side then he will be granted a chair and that chair is his throne. It is written by David, "The Lord said to my lord, "Sit at My right hand until I make your enemies a footstool for your feet (Psalm 110:1)," and "To him that overcomes, I will give the right to sit with me on my throne, just as I overcome and sat down with my Father on his throne (Rev 3:21)," then in due time he would come to earth again, and take the same position as David in Jerusalem, and so sit on the throne of Israel. He would also fulfill many other promises and prophecies which He would not be able to fulfill if Yehoshua were to be left in the grave and never to live again after his death. Therefore, if this were the case as well, not even a single human could be saved after that point if He would not resurrect him, for he himself said, "no one can come to the Father unless he go through me." There are many other verses in the scripture that also give us more truths regarding this, that there are only two els existing, not more or less and they are definitely not equal in power, or knowledge. Nature also testifies to this, this is the reason They set up nature in this manner, so that mankind has no excuse for not knowing the truth. For example, there are no more, and no less than two that keeps a single species or 'kind' in existence. For there is just a male and a female regarding all species, as in mankind, animals, birds, fish, trees, plants, bugs, insects and even flowers. You can even look to the hosts of the expanse which they made for this truth, for they only made two great luminaries. The greater one to rule the day and the lesser to rule the night. But to go deeper in truth the moon has no light in itself it only reflects it. This is like Jesus and the Father for Jesus said, "the words that I speak are not my own, but the Father's." Other verses also testify to this truth, by simply mentioning only two individuals exist, such as: "The sayings of Agur son of Jakeh - an oracle: This man declared to Ithiel, to Ithiel and to Ucal: I am the most ignorant of men: I do not have a man's understanding. I have not learned wisdom, nor have I knowledge of the holy ONES. Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is His name, and the name of His son? Tell me if you know (Proverbs 30:1-4)!" and "These are the words of him who holds the seven spirits of God (the 7 archangels) - I have not found your deeds complete in the sight of my God (Rev 3:1-2)," "I am coming soon - to him who overcomes I will make a pillar in the temple of my God. Never again will he leave it. I will write on him the name of my God - and I will also write on him my new name (Rev 3:11-12)," and many more speak of only two els. When however the son was disglorified so that the Father caused him to be a man, the Father was the only "EL" and "SPIRIT" in existence at that time. This was until the Father glorified him with the glory he had before the world existed. Thus two el-s are existing, this is the reason the word, "Elohim," is used and is stated numerous times in scripture, as in Gen 1:1, "During the inauguration the (Elohim) created the heavens and the earth." Concerning these two els however, each of them has their own body as I have basically stated, by saying they are separate from each other, as Adam and Eve are. They have their own separate thrones and because they have heavenly bodies this is the reason the angels and the heavenly beings can see them. Also, some of the prophets such as Daniel, Ezekiel, Moses and Isaiah, and of course, likewise Adam when one of them was walking in the garden  in  the  cool  of  the

                                    ----------------[PAGE 9 WHEN PRINTED]----------------

day, which was Yehoshua/Jesus. But, they can exist in all places as I have mentioned, so when the scripture mentions, "the Spirit," the Spirit is not a third Individual, nor a part of some Trinity as many have come to believe, but rather they are not simply limited to those bodies or forms. One reason for having these forms is so that the angels and the heavenly hosts can present themselves to them as during the time of Job's life, or in the days of king Ahab in 1 Kings 22:19-22. Thus, each of them has a central body form in which all spirits are able to see them and it is in the likeness of these forms that we men were made in. It is written, "Above the expanse over their (the cherubim) heads was what looked like a throne of sapphire, and high above on the throne was a figure like of a man (Ezekiel 1:26)," yet they can dwell everywhere and the part which is not of this central body form is pure spirit, thus saying there are two SPIRITS. So now you should be able to understand what Jesus was talking about when he said, "The counselor shall not come unless I go away and you know him for he now dwells with you, and will be in you, and so my Father and I (just two individuals here) will make our dwelling in you." For the 'SPIRIT (that is Jesus in spirit form)' could not come until he left, because Jesus was (before he became a man) and is now, this particular 'spirit' in which he was talking about. And, as long as he was not yet glorified to his former state he could not be in all places as the same time, nor exist in a single person at that time. But, when scriptures talk about that the 'Spirit' descended like a dove and rested on Jesus after John baptized him, this is talking about the Father, for only one Spirit was in existence at that time, because Jesus was disglorified and not in his former state yet. This is the reason Jesus only mentions himself and the Father by saying, "I and the Father are one." Thus when you read the word, "SPIRIT" you must understand whom the scriptures are talking about, whether it is talking about the Father, or the Son, and so to determine this you have to look at when the story is taking place and what the circumstances it is written in. So to help you out a bit in this, if the story is taking place between Jesus's conception to the moment of his glorification it is usually talking about the Father. But, for statements like, "I will grant you another counselor, the Spirit of Truth," the scriptures are now talking about Jesus. Moreover, when Jesus was in the synagogue and he read from the scroll of Isaiah and the prophet wrote, "The Spirit of the Lord is upon me...," this is now talking about the Father. Before time and the making of the Son, the Father was not yet a Father, so He stood alone, He never had a beginning as the Son has and He shall never have a end, He endures forever. He is the Blessed One, the Everlasting. Yet eventually He thought of a great plan to make a being or individual similar to Himself and to have this being or person make and create all, so during eternity while He was still alone He took on a form similar to that of a man, which I mentioned above. This is His central body form and from this form He took a piece from it and made the Son. Thus saying, "As in heaven so on earth." Therefore, there are two els and one of these els, (the Father) is the only Eternal God and the other el is the Son, the Moshiach, he was made like Him, he is the firstborn of all creation.

    Now after all of this, you must not be unconcerned regarding this truth, by saying what does it matter just as long as I believe in the Son and that he died for my sins? Because the Trinity does not exist, nor a Triune natured, nor Triune personality God or One that has three different ministries, because that such god is different from the truth. If you believe this false trinity doctrine, you will be committing idolatry and you shall go to hell for this belief. Also, you must not assert there are three Gods, for this would be a violation of the first command of the ten commandments by having more than one God, whom is the Father alone.

    Now to add to this, after I was sending this document to others, I was somehow led to an encyclopedia about something and I came across a group of people that lived during the time and before the Nicene Council took place. They were the Arians of the Arianism beliefs, which deny that Jesus is the God of Israel, which is true. They somewhat taught the ways of Judaism and of the New Testament accurately where this is what they said, “Arius said that God is unbegotton and without beginning, the Son however is begotten and so therefore cannot be God, but rather was made and so exists by the will of the Father as like any other being and creature and is held

                                    ----------------[PAGE 10 WHEN PRINTED]----------------

accountable as well for his actions as are the angels, which of some fell away from following the Father and so  can also fall away if he so chooses.” Arius however was not an authority figure of the so called "Holy Roman Empire" and so was labeled as a heretic. This group of people was named Arians in modern times by historians, so they can label this group of people that believed in this particular way. Arius did not invent the teaching, but preached it and really advocated it and so was condemned directly because of it. Modern historians do not know any others by name that took this faith, so the historians named it after Arius, but they can agree there were thousands of such believers during and before Arius.

    For this is what the Nicene Creed says in part, I will not mention all of it, since it is so evil and wrong. I will quote just a little to show where they foul up in their doctrine that casts most non-Jewish believers in Yehoshua (Jesus) on a highway to hell for causing them to believe a lie and in a non-existing God. The Nicene Council took place because of Arius or because of people as him. Here is the creed:

___________________________________________________________________________________

This section of this webpage is strictly for those searching by the means of a search engine, since Google picks up key words or "meta tags" of particular websites concerning the topic or subject asked. Below are some answers to questions that others asked in order to catch them in the fishing net of heshallgovern.com

1. Is Jesus God? No, please click here to see why Trinitarians are in error

2. Did Jesus deny being God? Yes, please click here to find out more

3. Are there three gods? No, please click here to see why the trinity is not biblical.

4. Is the trinity biblical? No, click here to see why. It was first used by Tertullian and invented by non-Jews in Turkey around 110 CE/AD

5. Is the Trinity in the bible? No, click here to see why. It was first used by Tertullian and invented by non-Jews in Turkey around 110 CE/AD.

6. Tertullian, a pagan and a preacher of unrighteousness who coined the word "Trinity" please click here to see why he was in error.

7. Ignatius, a preacher of unrighteousness from c.35 - c.107, lick here to see why he was in error

8. Irenaeus of Lyons, a preacher of unrighteousness from c. 115 - c. 202, click here to see why he was in error.

9. "Proving Jesus is God" - I scholarly look into the four gospels and how they cannot support the notion that Jesus is God in the flesh. Once understanding the genuine texts and the culture of Israel and Judaism you will understand who Jesus really is.

10. Is Jesus God? No!! A scholarly look into the gospels that prove Jesus is not, nor ever claimed to be the God of Israel, but HIS personal son and child.

11. Is the trinity in the Bible? No!!! In the original texts - NO. But in the texts that have been tampered with, yes and it can be proven [Click here to see].

12. Commentary on John 1:14. A deep look into the truth behind this verse and how it has become tainted because of Trinitarians vs. understanding it through the eyes of Judaism - the faith and culture of Jesus and Israel [CLICK HERE].

13. Commentary on John 1:1. A deep look into the truth behind this verse and how it has become tainted because of Trinitarians vs. understanding it through the eyes of Judaism - the faith and culture of Jesus and Israel [CLICK HERE].

14. See the facts why Jesus is not God [Click here]

15. The Jewish messiah is not the God of Israel, but his greatest servant.

16. Who is the Jewish messiah? Find out here.

17. What is a messiah? Find out here.

18. Is Jesus the messiah? read this Jewish review on the man named Jesus

19. What does Elohim mean? Click here to find out!

20. Monotheism - Please click here to find out more

21. What does Judaism teach? Please click here

22. What is monotheism? Please click here

23. What is Elohim? Please click here

24. Understanding Elohim - please click here

25. Is the Trinity in the Bible? No - Click here to see why

26. Proving the trinity? - Click here to see why you can't

27. Is Jesus God? No!! Click here to see why

28. Second person of the Godhead? Click here to see why this is false!!

29. Explaining the trinity - please click here for more

30. scriptural proofs for the trinity - please click here

31. Why Jesus is God - please click here to see why he is not!!

32. Why Jews don't believe in Jesus, please click here to find out more.

33. What are Jews missing? please click here for more info

34. Are there errors in the bible? Yes, please click here so see them.

35. What is the meaning of Elohim? please click here for more information

36. YHWH, what does this name mean? please click here to find out more.

37. Who is YHWH?, please click here for more information.

38. What is the will of the Lord? Please click here fore more information

39. Countering Muslims, why they are correct by saying "Jesus is not God," please click here for more information.

40. Commentary to Genesis 1:1 - please click here for a rich and long commentary

41. Commentary to Genesis 1:26 - please click here for a rich and long commentary

42. Commentary to Isaiah 9:6 - please click here for a rich and long commentary

43. Is Jesus the Prince of Peace?" Yes, please click here for more information and commentary.

44. Understanding Isaiah 9:6, please click here for more information and commentary.

45. Do Christians believe in three gods? Some do, but most don't - click here for more information.

46. Do Christians believe in 3 gods? Some do, but most don't - click here for more information.

47. How to explain the trinity? Why you can't - please click here.

48. Do Jews think Christians are pagans? Yes, because of the Trinity - please click here for more information.

49. Does Judaism teach the Trinity? No, click here to find out more.

50. Explaining the Trinity - click here for more information.

51. How to explain the Trinity - please click here for more information.

52. Is the Trinity biblical? No, please click here to find out why.

53. Judaism vs Christianity. What are the differences?  Please click here for more information.

54. What are the differences between Judaism vs Christianity? Please click here for more information.

55. What are the differences between Christianity and Judaism? Please click here for more information.

56. How can I explain the Trinity to others? Please click here.

"Yehowah said to my   master, 'Sit thou at My right hand until I make your enemies a footstool

for your feet [Psalm 110:1]' " and "...by his knowledge shall My righteous servant justify many

[Isa 53:11]."

This Document Gives Clear Cut Reasons Why Jesus is NOT, nor has he ever been, nor shall he ever be 'God,' or 'God in the flesh!' For he is a totally separate person from the sole patron God of Israel according to the biblical faith of the prophets, known as Judaism. In truth, the Jewish messiah is His greatest servant. The God of Israel gave [past tense] His servant a very glorious throne on the right side / right hand of His own Eternal Majestic Throne proving that the Jewish messiah is not the Monotheistic God of Israel.

Why Jesus / Yehoshua is not "God in the Flesh"

C.

WHAT ANIMALS

ARE KOSHER?

LISTEN TO:

HeShallGovern

Radio Ministries

*

*

= King David is talking

This page is under construction after the            is reached on the left side of the screen. I am adding a few things and editing a few things to make this sound and flow better. After you reach this yellow star, however, the grammar is unedited and gets pretty bad. You are more than welcome to read what I have here so far, but be sure to come back later as well. The reason I am posting this "under construction" version is because the importance of this information is under great demand. Thank you!!  PLEASE visit the front page also

* = King David is praying, yet being a king he still proclaims that two people are over him and that he obeys Yehowah through his master / rabbi / adonai

Torah:

This word is commonly understood to mean the first five books of the bible. This  meaning is true in modern times, but in reality the word "Torah" simply means "law." According to the teachings of the prophets, whenever a legitimate prophet uttered a commandment or statute in the name of Yehowah, that became binding law for the theocracy of ancient Israel and for any follower of Yehowah wherever he/she might be. Thus, the commandments in Israel's theocracy did not all stem from Moses or Abraham, but from other prophets as well.

Concerning the nation of Israel, after the exodus, when they were many, Moses spoke the bulk of the commands concerning the nation and what was expected of them in the land of Canaan.

But, when Israel was still a small clan - all the way up to Moses and the first Passover, the teachings of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob were the bulk of that pre-exodus Torah. The "Torah [laws]" that Abraham, Isaac and Jacob passed down were the same laws that existed from the very beginning, except for circumcision, but many of the laws were twisted or changed in some way from clan to clan. Abraham, being the prophet he was restored those ancient laws. However, when the Israelites were in Egypt for so long and had the awful influence of their idolatry, they forgot many of those laws or tainted them in some way.

You can even see the existence of the dietary laws in Genesis 7:2.

*

B.