steve

Dear friend of Fort Smith, Arkansas: Steve

I am so glad you got a chance to read the articles or some of the articles I sent to you. When I came across your sign in the front yard I thought you might want to hear the real truth vs the things that have been taught to you, or handed down to you which are considered "the truth" among the populace. In this paper, we will learn that this so-called 'truth' that has been sold to you, through the man made faiths of America, the council of Nicene and elsewhere, is false. I say so because up to this day I have not yet met a non-Jew, a Gentile, that knows the truth about Judaism or the messiah of Judaism, nor what the God of Israel demands of folks. When I read your testimony and your letter that you wrote back to me, it only confirmed the "populace's" falsehood that you have been accepting for some time. At the very end of your letter you say, "I am not interested in arguing or debating, but am interested in the truth." With that, I will and shall give you the blunt truth. I just hope that you can see it without the prism that has been given to you

though false preachers and ignorant non-Jews.

With this letter I will answer your letter in whole regarding all your questions and respond to all of your sayings or comments and anything that might be in error according to the God of Israel, who is not a tri-une God, nor a tri-natured God, nor a tri-manifested God.

With this let me start off by answering your first set of questions, then I will get back to the beginning of your letter. You ask:

1. I think I understand what you believe about God and Jesus. Am I correct in saying that you believe that God the Father is eternal and that God created Jesus in His image in eternity? Does this make Jesus a created God? Does this now make Jesus eternal? Does this not make two Gods?

Just by the way you ask this question we see that you are clouded in Trinitarian belief and because of that, you could not understand my article in its fullness. Thus, also proving you do not know what the Torah or what the Tanach teaches, in regards to the God of Israel and about this special figure we call, the moshiach. Notice I used a little "m" for "moshiach [messiah / christ]."

There is just one God, this is the God of Israel. There is NOT a God in existence that is this: "God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Spirit and these three are one."

When prophets like Moses, Samuel, Noah, Isaiah, Daniel, Micaiah and others came on the scene they taught the people or masses the ways of holiness and righteousness. They taught that this is accomplished by a devout and disciplined life through the observance of the laws and decrees they were given from the God of Israel. In this beautiful faith these holy men or prophets taught that sinners can never be saved and are never forgiven and shall be condemned in the far off future on the day of judgment which shall in fact befall all mankind and shall also be cursed in this life if He so choses, because they transgress His covenant. In truth however, they taught that only when an individual should cease being a sinner can they be "saved" and gain salvation. Thus, sinners are not saved, they never have been saved, nor ever will be saved. Therefore, let that and this be very clear: A sinner must leave and deny his evil ways and cling unto the holy laws, commandments and statutes, that consist of well over 2000 commandments - not just 10 to 12 of them, that were decreed by this God, the God of Israel. He must do so with full integrity, all of the time, in order to gain salvation from Him. Then and only then can one be "saved" on the day of judgment. Remember this one thing: one is not 'saved' until one gets on the ark, it is never those that just believe a flood is coming. These special messengers also taught the people that there was just one God, the Ancient of Days (Daniel 7) or the God of Israel, and that He stands alone. While they said there is none like Him, He is, however, a person that can be addressed.

The faith that these prophets uttered unto the people came to be known as Judaism. This was based on the fact that this God's Holy Temple stood in the land known as Judea and this was the faith and practices of the people there.

Moving on:

We humans were made in His image. Thus saying, "all that I am, He is - but greater." Meaning: if I can get angry so can He; if I can be grieved, so can He; if I can be glad, so can He. If I am holy because I obey Him, He is holy for He is the ultimate Judge and is not a hypocrite and Who is always good natured, fair and just. He does not pray to Himself, thus He is not a schizophrenic and He has never been on earth, ever. When the God of Israel, who all must serve and

obey - even the moshiach, shall finally come to earth it shall be after the time that His agent, the faithful servant, His anointed - whom He appointed - shall judge humanity on the day of judgment. Then and only then shall He finally come down to this earth with the heavenly Jerusalem.

Now then, the first and only work of this great and awesome God, the God of Israel, was that He made, not created, His very own son.

Let me stop for a moment......

I feel I need to explain things to you in a high detailed way before I can continue on. I say this because most non-Jews do not know what the Torah even says or teaches, nor do most Jews if you want to know the truth, about the God of Israel and his son and how mighty that this son is. When the prophets wrote the narratives that they penned they were not only stating the facts of history, but they were also telling a future prophecy or doctrine through that narrative. Thus, when the narrator wrote Genesis, he wrote down the events of history precisely as they occurred, with no alterations. This was done for a reason. It was done in order to tell a story, doctrine or prophecy within the actual events of history so that the unlearned can see these thing pretty clearly. Most of the things that are taught within these stories have to do with two particular individuals, being the God of Israel and His only begotten son. These stories show how He has dealt with His son in the past or how He shall deal with him in the future, but it must be viewed from the time the narrator was writing the story. These things or doctrinal truths can easily be seen if the reader has not already been given a tainted prism, such as what is taught in mainstream 'Christianity,' including and especially the baptist movements (I am not trying to offend you here, nor am I arguing, I am just stating the fact that on almost every issue and doctrine that Baptists hold dear, such things are not found in the Tanach (truths that were written by the prophets of YHWH); or it is rendered heresy by the faith of Yehoshua or Jesus, which is Judaism). This is why it is so hard to convert a Jew versus a non-Jew who does not know truth and so can be easily sifted to anything that "sounds good".

Moving on to my point: When the narrator wrote Genesis, he was trying to get a message across to the simple through the actual events that took place. When he tells us the story of how Eve came into existence, he was also telling us

that in like manner this is how the greatest of all the spirits that has come into existence came about. Eve was not made from the earth, but from Adam himself. In like manner, the greatest of all the beings that has come into existence, the "most high," did not come about because the God of Israel created him from nothing, rather he was made from His very own essence. Furthermore, there was just one person made from that rib of Adam, so too there was just one son made, thus he is the only begotten. Remember, in order to believe the Tanach in which he is called, the 'begotten," this means he did not always exist, but has an actual "birth" sort of to speak, for lack of a better word. The third similarity is that it was not through Adam's womb [for he obviously has none] that all mankind has come into existence, but it is through Eve's womb, thus pointing to the fact it was this son or the prince that was given the command to bring all things into existence, for the King obeys no one, rather all must serve Him, including this prince of peace. Therefore, this 'most high' did all of this by the command of his God or Father, thus it was he that rested on the seventh day, not his God. When we read the word: "Elohim" in the Hebrew Tanach, as in Genesis 1, this is a plural word for the word, 'el.' Pagans translate this as GOD, including the KJV people. An 'el' does not mean 'GOD,' but it includes the God of Israel. This is because of the nature of what an 'el' is. There are many spirits, some are angels, cherubs and seraphs, there are also horses as we see in 2 Kings 2:11 and 2 Kings 6:17, but there is also a type of spirit, in Biblical Hebrew culture, known as an 'el.' There are only two els in existence and this is what the narrator was trying to get across when he was talking about "mankind" only referring to two particular people at that time, not more or less, being Adam and Eve. In a similar fashion, this is why the son only made two great luminaries, the sun and the moon, in order to show people that there are only two els. Yet, like these two great luminaries, only one has light whereas the other only reflects it.

Now it is by Jesus himself that all things were created or made, thus also showing that he had to be here before all things, thus he is the firstborn of all creation. Jesus is not a "created God," rather he is simply the highest ranking spirit there is under the KING Himself, similarly as all worldly princes are to that nation's or kingdom's king. This is why the Joseph and Pharaoh story is written down the way it is. For this story shows that as Joseph was made most high in all of Egypt, except the throne itself, so the same with Jesus in relation to the only God.

Further notes: if we know that an angel can kill 185,000 men in a single blow (2 Kings 19:35) or the children of Egypt or the people of Sodom; And, that rebellious spirits can enter into sinners as we see with King Saul or with people in Jesus' day, how much easier is it for the prince or the very son of the God of Heaven and Earth who actually made everything to be able to do the same if he so desires? If therefore Jesus is greater then all that his hands have made, how much easier is it for the One that made him to do likewise? Thus, if the Father is in Jesus and he in turn decides to be in us, then it is just automatic that the God of Israel is also in us. It should be pretty clear then to understand Jesus' words when he says, "If anyone loves me, he will obey my teaching. My Father will love him, and we will come to him and make our home with him (John 14:23)" and "the Father is in me."

Jesus is not "eternal" (in the sense of: "always was," only his God is that), nor is he "God," nor a god. He is simply a made being, not created though, for there is a difference, yet he has more power than all of the hosts. There is none

like him of all that has come into being. Yet he still is, and always will be subject to His God, the only God, just as all else are. This is why the following things are stated the way they are:

1. John 1:10, "He was in the world, and the world was made by him"

2. 1 Cor 15, "Now when it says that 'everything' has been put under him, it is clear that this does not include God

Himself, who put everything under Christ. When He has done this, then the Son himself will be made subject

(this is an ignorant thing to say, for the son/prince is always subject to the KING) to Him who put everything

under him, so that God may be all in all."

3. John 15:10, "I have obeyed my Father's commands and thus remain in His love." By this we see that Jesus can

also be condemned as any other being can if he does not obey the God of Israel. For if Jesus was truly 'God'

then he is not subject to anyone, especially for judgment. He however admits here that he is not the ultimate

judge, rather his Father or God is. Jesus simply has been entrusted with the things of judgment as he himself

says in John 5:22-23, "the Father judges no one, but has entrusted all judgment to the Son, that all may honor

the Son just as they honor the Father. He who does not honor the Son does not honor the Father, who sent

him."

Now considering all the things I just mentioned, how should we really read or translate John 1:1, seeing that Jesus is not GOD, nor a god, but is an el?

It should be like this:

In the beginning was the 'word (Jesus)' and the word was with EL (the Eternal One) and the word was also an el (the made el)." Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

One must remember that John was writing in Greek, to a Greek-speaking audience, thus his words in Greek were limited in meaning when trying to speak of Jewish or Hebrew doctrines and beliefs. If you look throughout John's Gospel however, versus other gospels, we see that the Eternal One is spelled as "Theov" where as the son is designated as "Theos." Meaning John was trying to show that they were quite different. However, all English versions,

including the King James Bible, are in grave error when it comes to several verses. John 1:1 is just one of them because they were translated by Trinitarians. In other words the translators had to make things fit their own beliefs, else their bible be "wrong", in their own eyes.

So what is the final analysis? Regardless of when each individual spirit was made or created, meaning: regardless if a spirit came before anything else should exist, or if all other spirits should be created during the 6 days of creation by a spirit(Jesus) that is greater than the spirits he is creating, yet also has a starting point, there remains just one spirit that is Eternal, this obviously would be the God of Jesus, who also is the God of all. Likewise, as was somewhat just mentioned, regardless of how powerful a spirit should be or what abilities he might have when compared to other spirits to indicate their rank or position, there remains just one Person that stands alone and none can overpower Him or can do what He can do. This Person is the God of Yehoshua / Jesus and the God of all. He is the only One that is Eternal. The only One that never had a beginning point. This is why He is called the King, Ancient of Days and King of Peace, versus prince of peace. Remember that a prince is a son and this is why Jesus sits on a separate throne at His right hand. Hence, this is the sole purpose and why Jesus says these things in John, "The Father is greater than I." And, "My Father, which gave them (the Jewish believers) me, is greater then all."

To prove this point even more, let us see a mere handful of many key passages in order to see what they have to say which will confirm these truths of Judaism. I will also give some commentaries to these passages:

1) If Jesus was truly the God of heaven and earth, why does he not even know the date of

"His" own coming? For he says,

"No one knows about that day or hour, not even the angels in heaven, nor

the Son, but only the Father." (Matt 24:36)

As you can see, Jesus does not claim to know the day or hour he will return.

Furthermore, Jesus makes known here that he is not God. For if the

trinity truly did exist, and so there is just one God, monotheism, then Jesus

would be the Father, or also the "Spirit." Since there "is just one God."

Thus, Jesus would simply come as a Father, or the Spirit; that is if the

trinity doctrine were to be true, but it is not. Rather it is a false

doctrine!

2) If Jesus were "God," why in the world would he have to call on anyone to send

spirits lower in power and rank and created beings for that matter, for help?

For he says,

"Do you think I cannot call on my Father, and He will at once put at my disposal

more than twelve legions of angels?" (Matt 26:53)

Commentary: Here Jesus admits that angels are greater than he, at this point of

his existence, thus proving that he is not "God in the flesh" nor "all God and all man"

as the non-Jewish people teach, which is wrong.

3) If Jesus was "God" why in the world does he ask someone else to glorify him,

rather than just glorifying himself? For, if he is "God", he could do anything!

For he says,

"And now, Father, glorify me in Your Presence with the glory I had with You before

the world began." (John 17:5)

4) If Jesus was truly the God of Israel, why does he have to obey someone else and can be

potentially condemned if he does not obey that other somebody?

For he says,

"If you obey my commands, you will remain in my love, just as I have obeyed my

Father's commands and remain in His love." (John 15:10)

Thus, indicating if he does not obey his Father, he will not remain in his Father's

love. Rather, he would be in His wrath; and so if in His wrath, then he can also go to

hell just like the fallen angels will, and disobedient people will. For there is only one

God, and that is the Ancient of Days, not Jesus. For if Jesus is His son, then he is

not THE King, rather he is a prince and so it is said, "the prince of peace," rather than

the King of Peace. This verse also proves, beyond a doubt, that Jesus was, is, and had

to be in direct obedience to One greater than he. (See #5)

5) If Jesus were the God of Israel, then why would he say that the Father was greater than he?

John 14:28 "Ye have heard how I said unto you, I go away, and come [again] unto you.

If ye loved me, ye would rejoice, because I said, I go unto the Father: for my Father is

greater than I." Even though a Trinitarian might say something here, but what do you really

expect from them? The fact of the matter is that the God of Israel is not a single God with

a Triune nature, nor does He come, nor manifest in three different forms over time, nor at all.

Thus also making this doctrine totally demonic and false about Him having a triune nature

and one part is weaker. NO, rather there is just one God, with one nature, with a single Throne and

He once was all alone during eternity. In the passage of eternity, He made, not created His

son in His own likeness and character and with extreme knowledge and wisdom, but not ultimate

knowledge and wisdom, for he does not even know the day he is coming. Nor does he know

anything unless the Father shows him something. Jesus was and is His first and only outright

making, all else came through Jesus by the commandment of the God of Israel. There is none like

Jesus in rank, thus and therefore he is considered the "Most High" out of all that has come into

existence, like Joseph was made a most high in all of Egypt, except for the throne itself, because

he had no power to do such. So the same with Jesus and that is why the "Pharaoh and Joseph"

story is there, so people would see this prophecy of Jesus.

To go along with this #5, if Jesus were this God of Israel, being a monotheistic God, thus meaning

there is only one God, why then is there a second throne on the right of another throne. Secondly,

if Jesus is this monotheistic God, why does he not then take or just sit on his own throne versus

him getting invited to sit on a second throne that is next to the Person that is letting him sit there?

Here is the verse, "Yehowah said to my lord, "Sit at My right hand until I make your enemies a

a footstool for your feet (Psalm 110)." Furthermore, when reading this we can mention a third thing,

"If Jesus were the God of Israel, why does Someone else have to subdue his enemies vs. him himself?"

Got it! Stop, believing a wicked, non-Jewish, Catholic, hand-me-down doctrine that is sorely false

and outright evil. All those that believe this wicked doctrine, shall and will go to hell and deserve it.

6) If Jesus were the God of Israel or "God made flesh", why does he not then accept the compliment of being

a ''good teacher," and then afterward states that he is not the God of Israel, nor does he compare

to Him in goodness? For this is what is said in Mark 10, "As Jesus started on his way, a man ran up to

him and fell on his knees before him. "Good teacher," he asked, "what must I do to inherit eternal life?"

"Why do you call me good?" Jesus answered. "No one is good—except God alone."

Another thing that real biblical Judaism teaches, what you may not be aware of, is the knowledge of time or the concepts of time.

You must understand or come to realize the fact that 'time' is always existing. This is true regardless if someone starts measuring it from some reference point. In case you do not quite understand what I just said on a deeper level it is this: What I mean is that 'time' is just as old and equally as old or ancient as Yehowah Himself. This is because of the fact that regardless if someone would measure time from some reference point, or if that nothing were to exist at all, time is always there in and of itself. Therefore, what the prophets taught is that at the very moment when the moshiach started creating, a particular reference point was made, this is commonly called the "six days of creation." The time that existed prior to that reference point is commonly called "eternity." Jesus was made by the only God during the days or time of 'eternity'. This is pretty clear in saying that the moshiach is not as old as time itself, for only the God of Israel is that. The prophets call this time, 'eternity,' because, like the God of Israel, there is no beginning point to it. Meaning: it always was, just as the God of Israel has no beginning. However, one can make reference points within this time. This is why the prophet Micah and others do just that by pointing out the fact that it was during these days that the moshiach was made, "But thou, Bethlehem Ephratah, [though] thou be little among the thousands of Judah, [yet] out of thee shall he come forth unto me [that is] to be ruler in Israel; whose goings forth [have been] from of old, during the days of eternity." The prophets did not ever say that he, Jesus, was or is eternal, rather that he was brought into existence during that time. Only the God of Israel is Eternal or old as time itself, this is why Daniel the Prophet in Dan 7, calls him "The Ancient of Days,' because His years are literally without number. Not Jesus however, his days can be numbered.

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

Wow! All that was to answer the first of all the questions. Moving forward to the next question.

Next you Ask:

"2. I am having a little bit of trouble trying to figure out how much Jesus the Son is like God the Father. Can He be everywhere at once? Does he have all power over everything and everybody but God the Father? Obviously, you believe He created everything. So how should we treat Him? Should we worship Him?"

These are all great questions, I will answer them all. I will start off with the first question in this set.

Jesus is a made being, thus he is nothing like his God, in a side-by-side comparison. I know it may be hard for you to overcome the deception of the Trinity, but Jesus is not God, thus we should never address him with a capital H when we say, 'he' or 'him' when referring to Jesus. When you view angels (understanding their qualities), you somewhat know how powerful they are, for they can be invisible to all, yet people hear them or they can appear to one person in a crowd of many as we see in the Balaam story where the angel was seen by the donkey but not by the prophet himself. In the days right before Samson was born, we see that angels are not harmed by earthly fire as one stood, apparently, among the sacrifice of Samson's parents and then went back to heaven. We see that they can somehow protect humans from fire hurting them, even though it is on them and likewise their cloths, as we see with Daniel's three holy and torah observant friends. We see that they can and do slay the wicked as one angel did to the 185,000 men of Assyria during the days of Isaiah the prophet and king Hezekiah. We even see them cursing people with muteness or dumbness as with John the baptist's male parent. Another ability that we see angels having is the ability to choose right and wrong and either keep their integrity or throw it away. We see them even having the power to 100% manifest themselves to the point we cannot understand that they are even angelic, such as with Samson's parents and the women that were married to them before and after the flood. They were even able to produce seed and have children. With Abraham we see them eating and drinking. On top of all this, when they are sinning vs. the holy and righteous angels, we even see them having the power to enter the actual flesh of someone [to possess them] and cause great havoc for that person, thus they are very powerful. Nonetheless, we see that they do NOT know things unless they are told as in the answer to Daniel's prayer that was hindered for several weeks (Dan 10). In the same chapter of Daniel 10 we see that angels have ranks as with any military. With all of them, the spirits, they have one more quality in common regardless of one another's rank, that is they can be in only one place at one time. Now then, now that we know how awesome these spirits are, how much greater is their commander, the prince or the very son of God Himself. He is very great, but in many regards, he is exactly the same as we humans. It is said, (though it is false), because "Jesus is God" he is omni-present, meaning he is everywhere, even in the past and future. The reason why all of that statement is false is because when Jesus says, "but of that day or hour [of the messiah's return], no one knows, not even the son" proves he is not 'omni-present'. It likewise proves that the trinity does not exist, because if it did, then Jesus would be this 'only God' and so know when that day is. This also proves his knowledge is limited, thus proving also he is not God. Thus, like the angels, he must be taught. What is taught to him he reveals to his servants the saints, just as he himself says, "for all things that I have heard of my Father I have made known unto you (John 15:15)." Thus proving he does not know things on his own as does his God.

However, one ability of power he has above the angels or other spirits is that he can actually minister to several different people at once, and also be in those same people at once - versus just being in one person or talking to just one person at a time. For this is what Jesus says when he refers to himself after he should be taken away from the apostles and come back in spirit form on the day of Pentecost:

"I will not leave you as orphans; I will come to you. Before long, the world will not see me anymore, but you will see

me. Because I live, you also will live. On that day you will realize that I am in my Father, and you are in me, and I am in you." (John 14) The 'Spirit of Truth' Jesus is referring to is not a third person, because you do not see a third person in the passage I just gave, rather he only speaks of two persons, the Father or his God and he himself. Thus, he is saying that the 'Counselor' or the 'spirit of truth' is Jesus himself - after he has been glorified back to his previous state, as he was before his God disranked this prince to be equal with his subjects. Remember, this is what he says, "glorify me with the glory I had," in John 17. Likewise in Daniel 7 we see that the 'one like a son of man' was 'given' glory, power and sovereignty, not that he had it. Now as far as the proof that he can be in many people at once or places, here is the verse:

"For where two or three come together in my name, there am I with them." (Matt 18) It is clear by this passage, that if there is more than one group, he is also there. Likewise, because in the above paragraph, we see that he is talking about himself - when the 'spirit of truth' comes. Then on the day of Pentecost we see that 120 servants gained him, and even more people gained him after Philip went to Samaria to preach and they repented. Also, we see this when John and Peter went there and several thousand gained him and began to speak in tongues and prophesied to prove it.

Jesus has many similarities to his God, but he is no where close to His power, knowledge and attributes. It is the Father, or the only God that knows all, can conquer all, and can do all. I will say this about Him in those things He cannot do: People say that He cannot sin, well in actuality He can be a hypocrite if He so desires and so bend His own set of rules either for Himself or others, but He does not do such because He is always choosing to be fair, just, righteous, and holy. He can never die, nor can He be conquered. Jesus can and actually did, because he is a made being. The Father need not obey anyone, because of the fact just stated, whereas Jesus must always obey. They both have the form of humans, because we are made in their image. Moving on.....

Does he have all power over everything and everybody but God the Father? Correct. I even answered this in the first set of questions. Let me say it again, though. All of creation is governed by the son, yet the son is governed by the only God. Because of this - creation is automatically governed by Yehowah, regardless if it's not in a direct way.

So how should we treat Him? Should we worship Him?" You must fear Jesus, literally tremble, for he is the very son of the King, meaning he is a prince. However, you must remember that Jesus is just a mere prince, he is not the KING. Thus, we must honor and serve Jesus, because what he says are not his words alone, but they are the King's ways or words. So, yes, we must honor, serve, and even worship him. But don't be fooled, for our worship of him must only be a fraction in comparison to that of the KING, because it is the KING that is 'GOD,' not Jesus.

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

3. Do you believe man has a body, soul, and spirit? Or is there just 2 parts to man?

Listen, I know where you are going. You are trying hard to make valid a crooked doctrine in which not a

single prophet ever taught, nor ever mentioned, in the Tanach or Torah. This is why Jews brush off or give no heedance to all or any forms of any so-called 'Christianity' that teach the trinity. Look, Jesus - let me call him by his real name on earth, Yehoshua or Yehoshua ben Yosef. Yehoshua was a torah observant, yet unschooled, rabbi. The religious instructors had nothing bad to say about his doctrine, in fact they praised it and were quite astonished by it. It was his conduct that they had a problem with. This is because they made their traditions into binding law, such as Americans make abortion a binding part of American law. Thus, when he showed no regard for those things they judged him as sinning, when in fact he wasn't. For their customs were made to have more weight than the torah. The reason I am saying this is because if this rabbi, Jesus, would have taught anything of the sort regarding a Trinity, he would have been stoned for leading the people into idolatry. Especially if he, a mere man, would have dared say, "I am God in the flesh." Rather, Jesus WAS an "el [a class of spirits, ass angels are a class of spirits, there are only two els however, the Father and His son]" before he was disranked to the level of his subjects, humans. Then once again he was put back to that rank after he left earth on the cloud, as I mentioned earlier by quoting John 17, "glorify me with the glory I HAD." Likewise by what Daniel 7 says, "he was given power.....," thus meaning he lacked it. This is all in fulfillment of Psalm 8:5 that says, "You caused him to have less rank than the heavenly beings, then crowned him with glory and honor." Remember, the messiah was the promised or prophesied prophet that would be like and greater than Moses and all the rest. Thus, what the prophets said about him is that he will do greater works than us as far as power goes, and he will call sinners to repentance and have them follow the torah - which is the ways of holiness and righteousness, not just the showing of what sin is by transgressing what is written. For sinners are not saved, never have they been, nor will they ever be saved. Rather, when people stop being sinners by finally doing the will of heaven, that is His law, then and only then shall they be saved and their name written in the book of life. Paul has deceived you and many others, my friend.

Moving on. Your attempt with your analogy is in vain. For the flesh is flesh. The flesh does not, nor does the brain have anything to do with talking or thinking as we can see in 1 Samuel 28 in the 'witch of Endor' story. Before I continue, you must really believe in the scripture and not assume anything and so add your own words to it. I say this because

many people think that the witch is talking to a demon. The narrator that is writing this story in the name of the Lord does not say this, he says it is Samuel the prophet himself. This being the case, Samuel being dead, how can he talk without his body, let alone his brain? This is why the Lord Himself says not to commit necromancy, because it can be done. For why would the Lord of all people tell you something if it cannot be done. Similarly, He says, "Do not commit witchcraft." He says this because it can be done, for this is how Pharaoh's servants are able to do the exact same deeds as Moses the prophet did, up to a point. Thus, this necromancer was able to awaken the ghost / spirit of Samuel. On a footnote, if you read the story you might notice that his spirit is awakened, not just bothered, and it is obvious he was not in heaven. For Samuel says, "why have you risen me up?" (paraphrased), versus "called me down." I say this because many Gentile churches think and believe that when you die you go to either hell or heaven, which is not true. For if that where the case, then what is the point of the great white throne judgment of the lamb? No, when you die your corpse rots and your spirit sleeps, until the resurrection then the both are awakened.

Moving on: regarding the word, "Soul," this word in the Tanach means "one's life" or "one's state of breathing existence." I will show you:

1. "And the LORD God formed man [of] the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and

man became a living soul." Meaning that Adam was no longer a lifeless body laying on the ground.

2. "And it came to pass, as her soul was in departing, (for she died) that she called his name Benoni: but his father

called him Benjamin." Meaning that her life was coming to an end.

3. "Ye shall keep the sabbath therefore; for it [is] holy unto you: every one that defileth it shall surely be put to

death: for whosoever doeth [any] work therein, that soul shall be cut off from among his people." With this

we can see that a fellow human can harm/take away/cut off an actual "soul." This is because the biblical

definition is talking about a person's life that is strictly based on the breath in one's mouth. Therefore, one's soul

is something that another man can actually harm or take away, unlike one's spirit/ghost.

4. Another thing to point out in the 'witch of Endor' story is that Samuel's soul was not awakened, rather it was

solely and only his spirit, because only a body can obtain 'the breath of life [or 'soul']. It should then be

understood that a 'soul' has nothing to do with one's spirit, or mind / heart. Here is what the Tanach says in

1Samuel 28:

11 Then the woman asked, "Whom shall I bring up for you?"

"Bring up Samuel," he said.

12 When the woman saw Samuel, she cried out at the top of her voice and said to Saul, "Why have you

deceived me? You are Saul!"

13 The king said to her, "Don't be afraid. What do you see?"

The woman said, "I see a spirit [a] coming up out of the ground."

14 "What does he look like?" he asked.

"An old man wearing a robe is coming up," she said.

Then Saul knew it was Samuel, and he bowed down and prostrated himself with his face to the ground.

15 Samuel said to Saul, "Why have you disturbed me by bringing me up?"

You might then argue - 'What about Jesus' words in Matthew 10:28 that say, "And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell."

Well, let us look at it. This word in this verse only, in Greek is "psuche." According to the lexicons of the Greek language it means this, "an essence which differs from the body and is not dissolved by death." Thus, meaning one's spirit or ghost. This is exactly the context of the verse, one's spirit, just as with Samuel, therefore the KJV and many other versions should not have the word 'soul' there, because according to the context of the verse it is not talking about one's life or breath, but one's spirit. For, we see that Jesus tells those around him, do not be afraid of those that can end your life, or 'kill the body'. Because of this problem of having the wrong word in this verse, preachers end up preaching falsehoods, contradictions, and non-clear doctrines.

Thus, to finally answer your question outright, the answer is this: a person only has a body which houses their spirit, thus 2 parts. And as we can see with Samuel, the body is not needed for one to think, rationalize or to have intentions or motives [which is really one's 'heart', or their core self] that is used when talking to others. Let me comment on what I just wrote in the parenthesis: It is one's core self that one's 'fruits' expose, as in: "you shall know them by their fruits - for a bad tree cannot bear good fruit." Meaning that the hypocrite or liar is always found out eventually, even if his deeds or words are just a bluff of righteousness or something good for the time being. Thus, you "shall know them by their fruits", or what they are really about because of their core self, or what they love in their 'heart.'

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

4. What tribe of the sons of Israel are you from? I was taught that the genealogical records concerning the descendants of Israel have been lost. Is being a Jew a racial distinction or is it a religious distinction? Can I

become a Jew?

What tribe of the sons of Israel are you from?

Don't know, my personal history is lost for the time being. I say this because eventually a prophet will come and reveal things once again as HaShem has done throughout history for us.

I was taught that the genealogical records concerning the descendants of Israel have been lost.

This is true on a vast scale, but there are continual records of many families.

Is being a Jew a racial distinction or is it a religious distinction?

While being a "Jew" in its literal sense is strictly racial, however, as mentioned with the first set of questions, a Jew can also mean those people of the land of Judah that practiced the religion of that land / kingdom. I say this above by how the faith of the Tanach came to be known as Judaism. Thus, saying a Jew may not be a "Jew" at all. A better way of saying it now adays is whether or not someone is torah observant. Thus, let this statement flow as an answer to your next question. Yes, you can be torah observant, just like Cornelius was in Acts 10, or Ruth, Rahab and thousands of others, thus becoming "Jews." Isaiah even says this in Isa. 56:

3 Let no foreigner who has bound himself to the LORD say,

"The LORD will surely exclude me from his people."

And let not any eunuch complain,

"I am only a dry tree."

4 For this is what the LORD says:

"To the eunuchs who keep my Sabbaths,

who choose what pleases me

and hold fast to my covenant-

5 to them I will give within my temple and its walls

a memorial and a name

better than sons and daughters;

I will give them an everlasting name

that will not be cut off.

6 And foreigners who bind themselves to the LORD

to serve him,

to love the name of the LORD,

and to worship him,

all who keep the Sabbath without desecrating it

and who hold fast to my covenant- (that is all of the

Torah - which is easy to keep - unlike what is taught in

pagan churches that say it is impossible to keep or do)

7 these I will bring to my holy mountain

and give them joy in my house of prayer.

Their burnt offerings and sacrifices

will be accepted on my altar;

for my house will be called

a house of prayer for all nations."

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

5. Can I get a list of the 2000+ commandments you say I must keep in order to please God and enter

into life?

Yes. I can mail you a list of these commands or you can go to my website at www.heshallgovern.com and find many of them listed there ( I am still transferring them to the Internet). If you go to the Internet they would be listed under these web pages:

http://heshallgovern.homestead.com/Torah.html = the Torah

http://heshallgovern.homestead.com/sorceryII.html = laws against vitamins and medicine

http://heshallgovern.homestead.com/animals.html = food laws

http://heshallgovern.homestead.com/modest.html = clothing laws

http://heshallgovern.homestead.com/shabath.html = sabbath laws

http://heshallgovern.homestead.com/death.html = capital offense laws

just look through the whole website actually because all of it is "law," whether that be commands or doctrines.

Or, you can just read a big blanket of the commandments by reading Exodus 12 to the end of Deuteronomy. Within this torah, you will find around 800+. _______________________________________________________________________________________________

6. Can you get me a copy of the version of the Bible you use in English?

Yes. But in truth, I am actually trying to get my own version ready, with commentary so that people don't read a bible that has been filtered by Trinitarians, or by those that believe that sinners can actually be saved. This would mean throwing out all of Paul's writings, since he did not hold fast to the fundamental truths of Judaism.

On an off note: You must understand that in Paul's day and in Jesus' day there were two major schools of thought, especially when it came to non-Jews. These two schools were: the school of Hillel, which held the liberal view in that non-Jews did not have to observe the torah in whole, but only seven things. Those seven things are found in Genesis during the days of Noah, thus they call these seven things the seven Noahide laws. Hillel, was ignorant to the fact that Noah was a prophet and his sign was the flood itself after prophesying about it for 120 years and that he had and observed the same commands and laws that are found in the Torah. All except for about 30 of the 2000. Which are the phylacteries a man must wear between his eyes (Deut 6:8). Where we obviously see the torah observant messiah wearing them along with the hypocrite Pharisees in Matt 23:5. And other commands like this Noah did not have at that time, not even the sabbath, Passover, the Feast of Unleavened Bread, Pentecost, the Trumpet Feast and.... In regards

to the sabbath, sabbath observance did not come strictly because of creation itself, but mainly for the people to

remember that they were slaves in Egypt and that they were not allowed to rest. As it says in Deut 5:

Observe the Sabbath day by keeping it holy, as the LORD your God has commanded you. Six days you shall labor and do all your work, but the seventh day is a Sabbath to the LORD your God. On it you shall not do any work, neither you, nor your son or daughter, nor your manservant or maidservant, nor your ox, your donkey or any of your animals, nor the alien within your gates, so that your manservant and maidservant may rest, as you do. Remember that you were slaves in Egypt and that the LORD your God brought you out of there with a mighty hand and an outstretched arm. Therefore the LORD your God has commanded you to observe the Sabbath day.

Back to what we were talking about: The other school was the school of Shammai, which held the more authentic version of biblical Judaism when it came to non-Jews, meaning that they had to do all of the torah versus just seven commandments. The problem with both schools is that they were full of oral traditions. Paul came from the Hillel school. We know this because his instructor "Gamaliel" was well known and is talked about in Jewish history books. Gamaliel was from this very school of Hillel. In Acts 22 this is what Paul says, "I am verily a man which am a Jew, born in Tarsus, a city in Cilicia, yet brought up in this city at the feet of Gamaliel, and taught according to the perfect manner of the law of the fathers, and was zealous toward God, as ye all are this day." Yet, when we read his letters, at least me, I see this tainted Judaism coming through, where he does not even know the truth of the Tanach, but instead has a tainted and watered down version of it. Thus, the people he is talking to in the above verse paid no real heed to him, because they know that the prophets taught that the Torah is forever. Thus, their accusations against Paul were dead on true, for he did preach against the torah, it is all through his writings. This is why many churches, (no offense here) are disciples of this false apostle named Paul versus disciples of Jesus, especially Baptists, Evangel Temple, Harvest Time Tabernacle, Calvary Chapel and....

Now on the other hand, we see another breed of Pharisees, unlike Paul, that did convert and did not hold to the same liberal views as Paul, thus proving and marking a different school of thought. We see this is Acts 15, "Some men came down from Judea to Antioch and were teaching the brothers: "Unless you are circumcised, according to the custom taught by Moses, you cannot be saved." This brought Paul and Barnabas into sharp dispute and debate with them." This is also the main and sole reason the letter to the 'Galatians' was written, because of these same true followers of the messiah went there after Paul went there and so "bewitched" them. Because of this Paul wrote his letter to them in order to convert them back to his view or way. Even to the point of calling down a curse on man or angel if they should dare contradict Paul, yet, it was Paul that was in the wrong.

Oops, sorry for sounding off for such a long time against Paul. I will be more than glad to get a bible to you.

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

7. Can you list for me the portions of the Bible you think we should get rid of? Is it just what Paul wrote?

What about the Acts of the Apostles? Hebrews? James? Peter? John? How do we know which portions

are true and which are not?

Let me first start off by answering the last question first in this set of questions.

In order to know whether or not something is true or false when it comes to judging 'sacred writings' is actually quite an easy procedure. You, however, will always be gullible if you do not know what the will of the God of Israel is. Many people say, ask and pray, "What is His will for my life?" The 'will' of HaShem is for you to be holy which comes only

through observing His torah. By doing so, you literally cease in being a sinner, thus you are free from sin. If you hold on to integrity after learning and after you have started obeying, you will not even transgress. That is His 'will.' This 'will' or Torah teaches you through the commandments, decrees and statutes what is right and what is wrong in His sight, On the day of judgment all people, whether they like it or not, or believe it or not, shall and will be judged according to this Holy Torah. His 'will' is for you to learn what His prophets taught, thus you can know what His doctrines are and what the truth is concerning Himself, His son, angels, death, the resurrection, the age to come, when that age will come, and...... When these people spoke in the name of the Lord, the people were required NOT to heed them unless they were able to give a sign, without that sign anyone can claim to be a prophet and so lead them astray. When they were made valid, the people were then required to obey every jot and tittle of what they said, because they were uttering the very words of the Almighty Himself. Thus, when we read the gospels, Paul's writings or whosoever's, if they at all contradicted these holy men, they were and are to be discarded altogether, or read with a grain of salt if the author was just trying to give an historical account, without wanting his penship to be labeled 'sacred.' Thus, when we see the author of 'Matthew' claiming that the holy and blessed messiah went down to Egypt as an infant, we know that this is false, because the Torah says that the Israelites were never to go back there. Or if he lacks 3 to 4 people from his genealogy list, we know that his version is not valid, let alone Luke that adds people that do not even exist. Or if we see Jesus eating regular bread for 'Passover' in the gospel of Matt, Mark and Luke, we know that he would be sinning, thus that story is not valid. Rather, it is stories such as in John's gospel which claim that the night he was betrayed was not the Passover, but was a regular night and not a festival, thus he was allowed to eat regular bread, thus his version is valid. And.... regarding many other things. Paul's letters are not valid at all except for about 5% of all his

writings, which deals with the last supper also, where he claims he ate regular bread vs. unleavened bread, and that homosexuals and other types of picked out evil doers will be condemned, and that the rapture takes place after the wrath days at the "last (out of seven) trump", and that Jesus is not God on the top of all his letters and in 1 Cor 15. Whereas, about 85% of Hebrews is correct, about 94% of Peter is correct, John's 3 letters are 100% correct, James is 100% correct, Jude quotes the ancient pseudo-apocrypha, thus making it only 40% correct or less. Matthew, Mark and Luke have many flaws, but with discernment from the Tanach one can see them pretty clearly. Some are major, some are minor. The Gospel of John is the most reliable gospel if it is not tainted by a Trinitarian translating it. But as I said, the one that knows His 'will' can see this because the reader already knows who the messiah must be, what he must do or accomplish, and how he must live his life. For the prophets gave so many indicators of who the messiah must be and what he must do. Therefore, it would be pretty hard not to recognize him even if he were to be in a crowd of other torah observant people who might also look somewhat the same as him. Even if he were among all the prophets of history at once he would still stand out because his deeds would be greater than all of them combined.

I have a list of things on my website that deal with these contradictions, www.heshallgovern.com.

In truth, the main reason Gentiles are so deceived is because, thanks to Paul, they do not even read the Tanach. I have rebuked people that have said to me, "I have read the bible all the way through." Or, "I have read the Bible 3 times", and so on. I have then said, "And you have not learned a single thing either." For you overlook everything or do not take it to heart because you have been taught that the Tanach is "old and passing" and is "done away with" and that you are now "saved by grace lest any man should boast." All this comes from none other than Paul. What people, Jesus believers, don't understand is the fact that when the messiah comes he will sit on the throne of David. David's 'throne' was a theocracy. Thus, meaning he was the enforcer to what the priests and prophets uttered. Jesus however will not only be the king, but he will also be the high priest, thus there will be no shared authority, it is just him. This is why he will be a king in the order of Melchizedek. For he was the only law giver and ruler, he governed over a theocracy. That theocracy was blessed by HaShem also, for even Abraham gave this priest a tenth of all the plunder from the battle he came from. He does not ever, ever change. The Law he gave to his prophet Moses is the very law David enforced and all the righteous kings enforced. This law is the very standard he will use on the day of judgment, thus those that are found lacking in doing it are sinners and so not holy or righteous. This is why "faith" is not the end all in and of itself, it is supposed to be used in order to stir the individual to conviction and so repent and cease being a sinner by observing His torah. For believing in something or someone has nothing to do with following that person. It is only when someone ceases being selfish and starts taking the yoke of the torah upon his neck, which is light, and eventually molds himself into holiness, for it is a discipline as with anything else, and gains integrity in that walk one finally gets his/her name written in the book of life. One does not get their name written in that holy book of life the moment they repent, they must prove their repentance by turning from evil and living a holy life from that time onward. One is never saved at some "sinners prayer" or 'altar call' as thousands of people claim, and so deceive themselves, and eventually have to convince themselves they are 'saved.' Which they are as lost as they have always been. It is not that easy. So this death bed non-sense about saying a sinner's prayer while dying is a farse, the prophets never preached such things. For the sinner must learn so much in order to have their name eventually written in that holy book of life. What they need to learn can be taught to them very quickly. In fact, everything in this long letter has many of the things you need, it just does not have the law itself in order for you to be righteous or to know the full scale of things that are wrong, so you can turn from doing those things.

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

8. Do most orthodox Jews accept what you believe? Do you worship at a synagogue?

Yes, most Orthodox Jews do believe what I say and teach. Many Jews do not come to Jesus however because they don't read for themselves but rely on preachers. Because of this they see a pagan faith and religion, regardless of the denomination or nondenomination. This is because they hear them talk about a false god, a Trinity God (the Father, Son and Holy Spirit). Likewise that the law is done away with, sinners can actually be saved, when you die you automatically go to either hell or heaven, versus waiting in the grave till the resurrection and then you are judged. And, that the meek inherit the heavens versus 'the earth' - as we even see Jerusalem coming down to us, with also the Almighty. And.... So practically every aspect of doctrine 'Christians' believe in is false, except that Jesus is the messiah, yet they cannot prove it, or show them in their bible, the Tanach, versus just saying, "just because."

I don't worship at a synagogue here in Fort Smith because it is too far away from my home. For on sabbath you are not allowed to exert yourself, but gain strength for the following week. I would walk there if it was close by, because you are not allowed to operate a vehicle during sabbath hours. Besides, the synagogue here in Fort Smith is a liberal synagogue, they do not keep the torah, it is a 'Reform' Congregation. Basically, Jewish pagans. I am not allowed to open someone else's door during the sabbath either even if I did live close by, so how would I get in unless the door was already open? Likewise according to the Torah you must not participate with sinners. These are the types of people, at this synagogue, that the prophets wrote about, even though they do not do sacrifices, "your sacrifices are

abhorrent to Me and your assemblies are an abomination." "I desire holiness, not mere sacrifices or praise."

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

9. What do you do with your tithe? How do you keep the holy days?

As far as tithing goes, I literally obey what the torah says. It says you are not allowed to give your tithe to a prophet, preacher, or sage, but only to the Levites. This is because they were not given an allotment with the rest of the tribes of Israel in regards to having actual land. Their inheritance was the service of Yehowah. Because of this, they could not farm or raise cattle, thus they survived from the 10% the people gave them from everything. Whether that be of crops or spices, livestock or actual riches through labor or trade. There are a group of Levites in Jerusalem under the "Temple Institute." These people are getting ready for the coming and promised Holy Temple. They have all the holy garments ready and many of the articles of service for the Temple already made. They just need people such as myself to knock down the dome of the rock, for that is where the two previous Temples were located.

As far as holidays are concerned, only the sabbath is kept pretty much in full on my part, I say this because I am not a priest. If I were and the Holy Temple were to be existing I would also have to offer up the offerings that are prescribed for then and on other days throughout the year. Many of the others feasts deal very directly with the Temple itself, thus they cannot be observed. One must remember though that Daniel and the many other prophets were in the same dilemma as me or as the Jews of today. Let us use Passover for a moment. Many Jews will observe Passover in an oral tradition way, but you are not allowed to do so. Because the Passover can only be observed at the Temple itself you cannot do this service. However, there are only parts of it you must still do. The Passover, if the Temple were to be existing, must be sacrificed on the 14th day of the Jewish 1st month or Aviv or Abib. This is done during the time the daily burnt offering is offered in the evening, right before sundown. For the animal must be slain and dead and its blood sprinkled against the altar all before the end of sunset of the 14th day. According to the Jewish calendar our new 'day' or 24 hour period starts at the end of this sunset, thus this would now be the 15th 'day' of the month and so the first day of the Feast of Unleavened Bread begins. It is this same night that we eat the Passover lamb or goat after we should roast it over fire. Well even though we cannot do half the stuff of these festivals, we still must rid from our homes any bread that has yeast in it prior to the beginning of that 15th 'day.' So all the feasts are not carried out in full right now till that holy place be once again rebuilt.

Now because the messiah was prophesied about by the prophets to replace, not do away with, the atonement offerings with himself, we or I do not observe the Day of Atonement. In fact, the prophets say that it would be a sin to observe it, because it was replaced. Similarly, according to the prophets Gad and Nathen, David's seers, it would be a sin for the priests to offer up sacrifices at the Tabernacle after the Temple was dedicated by King Solomon. If you give yourself a Jewish mind for a moment and see things only to what is written or said, we see this very thing. In which Jesus only replaces the atonement and guilt offerings with himself, he says it on the night he was betrayed. For it says, "Then he took the cup, gave thanks and offered it to them, saying, "Drink from it, all of you. This is my blood of the new covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins." He does not say anything else here, thus he was replacing the atonement offerings with himself. However, one must remember that a man's words whom is claiming to be a prophet are not valid unless the sign he gives comes to pass. That came when he was resurrected by his God. So what did that 'sign' confirm? It did not say that this 'new covenant' does away with the law. No, he says it is for 'the forgiveness of sins.' Thus, meaning atonement. For all through his life he said you must do the Torah in order to be saved. Such as:

Matthew 23

1 Then spake Jesus to the multitude, and to his disciples,

2 Saying The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat:

3 All therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and do

Matthew 19

16 And, behold, one came and said unto him, Good Master, what

good thing shall I do, that I may have eternal life?

17 And he said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none

good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep

the commandments.

....and dozens more of such words from Jesus. Thus this prophet, Jesus, led the people back to the Torah as any prophet does, yet the heads of the land murdered him as they did with the rest of the prophets that came before him, because they were evil.

Dear Steve, I hope you see truth in this letter, for you are not even close to being saved. I love you brother and I just want to say you are so lost. Please repent once more, but this time to the true God and start following the instructions he gave to his prophets long before Jesus came in the flesh. Only then shall you be saved.

Thomas Shaler

3/25/2007 11 PM - 6 AM

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

P.S. I would now like to comment on your letter itself, apart from the questions I just answered.

You say, "Probably, the big difference we have with most Baptist is that we believe that the King James Bible is God's preserved word in English..... We believe that every word in that version is the word God wants us to have, we don't change it or correct it. Many of the mistakes people find with it are mistakes in the minds of the reader. They need to change their thinking not the Scriptures."

Remember what I said above, brother, in that if a person pens a book and that author is not a proven prophet by giving a fulfilled sign then that book must always be taken with a grain of salt. The King James Bible was not written or translated by a school of prophets, nor even a single prophet. Rather, 54 scholars started with the translation process and that number dwindled down to 47 scholars. For your info, 80% of the KJV New Testament comes from the

Tyndale Version that was printed around 1525 AD/CE. They also copied from the evil "Textus Receptus" which is a tainted Greek NT version by the Dutch Catholic scholar and humanist Desiderius Erasmus penned in 1516 AD/CE. In this version, and thus likewise the King James bible, yet not in the original Greek, 1 John 5:7 was added to 'confirm' the doctrine of the Trinity. This verse says, "For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one." Not a single, original or older, Greek NT has this verse, thus proving it was tampered with. If you know your history of the "Church", in 325 CE there was a great argument between a bishop in Alexandria, Egypt and other bishops, from elsewhere (all of these men were all non-Jews). Arius, the bishop in Alexandria, said that Jesus is not God, but was a being that came into existence. The other bishops at the time were already tainted. In their debate the Trinitarians use verse after verse to prove their point, yet not one time do the history books show them using this obvious verse. Thus, proving it was added later. In fact, there is no evidence of its existence even up to the 10th century. This verse is commonly known among the learned as "Comma Johanneum." There are many other errors in the King James Version that number in the hundreds to the thousands. Some are just mere names, while others are add-ins like 1 John 5:7 I just mentioned. One example is that in Job 38:31, we see that the translators are forcing Yehowah to acknowledge that memorializing Greek gods is fine, versus using the Hebrew word for this constellation, which does not do so. Here is the verse:

Canst thou bind the sweet influences of Pleiades, or loose the bands of Orion?

The Hebrew words are: "kimah" and "keh-seel"

Another error that the KJV has, as well as other versions, is found in Matthew 19:24, "It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle." The word, "camel" should not be there. This is because the true word that should be there is an Aramaic word for 'rope,' which sounds very close to the Greek word for camel. Now doesn't it make a little more sense?

All through Genesis and other books they translated the word, "Elohim," a plural word for, "el," thus more than one el, - into a single and non-plural word to be or to read as, "God." Thus doing a great disservice to the truth.

Steve, you must remember that the "Church of England" was made up of Catholics, or ex-Catholics, or people that had many of their beliefs handed down to them by Catholics; therefore they were very tainted. You should not be gullible into thinking this way, because you have already let falsehood lay hold of you and you will not be able to shake it until you broaden your horizons. Theological schools do not even use the KJV because of the many errors in it. They

actually use the "New American Standard Version", because of how "literal" the translation is. However, the scholars of this version, too, are out of line, after having judged them. The reason for this is that all the criticism I have for the KJV is mimicked, 100%, by them, except for 1 John 5:7. This is why I want to make my own version according to the prism of Judaism, versus letting people have tainted versions by people that claim to be followers of the torah-observant rabbi from Galilee.

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

In your pamphlet you write, "John Lennon. What a guy!..... Today, when I tell others about my admiration for John Lennon...."

My dear Steve, I am not sure if you still listen to John Lennon's music, because by the above quotes, it sounds like you do or might. If you ever desire to be holy and set apart, you must not ever envy, nor admire the wicked and the secular. In fact, you must have a total disdain for such things. Likewise, you must burn such music and never hear it. Holy men do not listen to the joys or sorrows of the fallen in song. Remember this rule forever: whatever you listen to or go and watch - you also approve of it and your deeds take pleasure in that very thing, thus exposing one's true self - regardless of all the talk one might utter. For this reason may all one's ways be only in the corral, or bounds, of the torah.

In all sincerity, the whole pamphlet should be tossed out, because your name is not even written in the book of life yet. Also, one is not 'saved' by the procedure you have listed therein.

www.HeShallGovern.com