Transcript to Radioshow # 22 held on July 20, 2008

Click speaker to listen to the radio show

1. How to Love HaShem correctly

2. When was our current Torah = Genesis through Deuteronomy, actually written?     

3. Was Jesus born from a virgin girl? NO!!!!

W

HeShallGovern Radio Ministries

elcome to:

  Here, we bear witness that Yehoshua is the

  actual son and child of HaShem, the God of Israel. Yoshua / Joshua / Jesus is the promised

  moshiach that the prophets spoke of. According to our Jewish prophets the moshiach is NOT the

  God of Israel in any shape or fashion, but is His greatest servant !!! Being a son, he then is a prince,

  thus he is the promised "prince of peace."

Maregaal

    ben  Yaakov

479-414-9249

HeShallGovern@yahoo.com

On KFPW 1230AM out of Fort Smith, Arkansas - Sundays 7:00 - 7:30 a.m.

Shalom everyone in my beloved listening audience and boker tov, that is "good morning" in Hebrew. Welcome to the hardest hitting radio broadcast on your radio dial, this is HeShallGovern Radio Ministries, a Judaic radio program. We are delighted you have joined us this morning. May the God of Israel, whose name is Yehowah, bless you and teach you as we look into the lives and words of His holy prophets that He sent among us long ago. Yehowah did this in order for us to practice the faith that heaven wants us to practice and nothing else, and that faith is nothing but biblical Judaism. 

I am your host for today's program, my name is Maregaal Ben Yaakov, or Margel in short.

HeShallGovern Radio Ministries, is thee very counter balance to what you get from the mainstream, whether that be mainstream so-called "Christianity" or mainstream "Judaism."

Yes - my dear friends - we teach you the things from the faith that is found in the Jewish bible, called the Tanach in Hebrew. A faith that only allows a holy theocracy like the one in effect long ago, as during the kings of Ancient Israel and Judea. Yes, we admit we are [q-uq] "Judaizers," but only in a pure sense, like Jonah was to Nineveh, Elisha to Naaman who came from Aram or modern day Syria and also Jesus - the greatest of all the messengers of HaShem who preached nothing but biblical Judaism to his fellow Israelites and also to the non-Jews alike that lived in the land of Israel and in all the places he traveled to.

Yes, my friends, do not mistake us for the Judaism that you will find in the synagogues around the world, nor what is found in yeshivas, or Jewish religious schools. Unlike them, we actually teach you from the literal Tanach or the Jewish bible itself. Whereas they teach you things that the prophets never taught, nor promoted, nor would they dare do so, but their focus is on the doctrines and teachings of men, from their Jewish sages who taint the holy torah and take many of the commandments out of context. 

These commandments by the way touch every aspect of life, like the things you must and must not believe in, the types of foods you are allowed and not allowed to eat, or the holidays you must observe, such as the sabbath, passover, the feast of tabernacles and so forth, how to raise your child, even commandments regarding farming where all things must be organic. Yes, my dear friends, in opposition to what preachers of mainstream christianity tell you, but not those of Judaism, according to the words of the prophets we can only love Him if we do so the way He wants us to love Him and that is by doing all of these commandments. In a similar fashion, He wants us to love our neighbor in the fashion that He shows us in these laws and not necessarily in the manner we think is best or what is right in our own eyes.

Yes, my dear friends, to talk about my beloved Jewish brothers for a moment, they say to the unlearned among them or those that refuse to read for themselves - and to outsiders that do not practice Judaism:

Quote, "When Moses did go up to Mt Sinai, he did in fact write down many laws that he heard, while others he passed on orally. This oral law that he received is in fact the interpretations and/or definitions of what was written down, that is the instructions of how to perform the written law, to put it into practice." Close-quote. This is utter Non-Sense and anyone with any reading comprehension can see that these so-called Rabbis have been telling us lies for a long time.

Yes, my friends, by saying this, these so-called "rabbis" give credence to their bogus quote-unquote "rabbinical teachings" to those people and only to those people that have no discernment. Where in truth, many - yet not all, of their teachings are outlandish teachings that blatantly contradict the words of the prophets and the torah we have today.  This torah by the way, in my educated opinion was written down sometime around 700 BCE when Hezekiah, a righteous king of Judah was alive.

If you want to know what the people back in Hezekiah's time thought about Moses and the things that he heard on Mt. Sinai, Just read Exodus. For this is what the narrator or narrators that penned Genesis through Deuteronomy SAID when Moses came down from Mt. Sinai in Exodus 24, he said that Moses wrote down all - that is A-L-L, that he heard from Yehowah. Thus, leaving no room for some so-called oral law as these phony sages of my Jewish brothers proclaim.

For here is what it says in Exodus 24-1-8,

Quote

"And he said unto Moses, Come up unto the LORD, thou, and Aaron, Nadab, and Abihu, and seventy of the elders of Israel; and worship ye afar off. And Moses alone shall come near the LORD: but they shall not come nigh; neither shall the people go up with him. And Moses came and told the people all the words of the LORD, and all the judgments: and all the people answered with one voice, and said, All the words which the LORD hath said will we do. And Moses wrote ALL the words of the LORD, and rose up early in the morning, and builded an altar under the hill, and twelve pillars, according to the twelve tribes of Israel. And he sent young men of the children of Israel, which offered burnt offerings, and sacrificed peace offerings of oxen unto the LORD. And Moses took half of the blood, and put [it] in basins; and half of the blood he sprinkled on the altar. And he took the book of the covenant, and read in the audience of the people: and they said, All that the LORD hath said will we do, and be obedient. And Moses took the blood, and sprinkled [it] on the people, and said, Behold the blood of the covenant, which the LORD hath made with you concerning all these words."

CLOSE QUOTE

Yes my friends,  - many people that are erroneously taught by ill-informed preachers whether they be Jewish or  so-called "Christians" - think that Moses wrote the first five books of our current bible - way back in 1465 BCE when he was alive, which could not be further from the truth.

In truth, these books were written sometime within the years of 850-BCE to 590 BCE, because of the mentioning of "Urartu" - commonly translated as Ararat in the Noah narrative. In truth ladies and gentlemen, it says that the the Ark of Noah landed on one of the many tall mountains within the kingdom of Urartu in Genesis 8:4 and not on a single and smaller mountain called Mt. Ararat. For if you read the text, you can clearly see that quote-unquote "Ararat" is a region and not a single mountain.

With that I would like to vere off for a moment to tell you a little bit about Jewish culture, for those of you that may not know too much about the Jewish culture or biblical Hebrew. Well, my dear friends, in this culture we do not have vowels in our written language, whereas in our spoken language we do. Now the time or age I am referring to or want to refer to is the time before the 3rd century CE and not now, I say this because in the Israeli culture of those days the Jewish sages did not invent yet these little markings that would determine our vowels in our spoken language. So after this point when a person would read something they would make no mistake in which vowels to use. Whereas before this time people would make errors all the time if words would have the same consonants.

An example of this would be the consonants T-and-M. As in Tim or Tom. So if someone said "so and so went to the store, yet the vowels were not in place, how would you know which person was being talking about if Tim and Tom were brothers or if the reader was born a few hundred years after their death and so never knew such people. Well, in truth, you wouldn't know which person was being talked about unless there was something else in the story that would give you a glue to which one it was referring to. As if one of these individuals were the king of Israel at one point where the other one wasn't, then - and only then - would it be clear who was being talked about because there was only one King named Tom and never a Tim. I hope that makes since.

So to get back on track, when the Jewish sages came across this word "Urartu" in the Hebrew they put in the wrong vowels and came out with Ararat, vs, Urartu. In truth, these sages made a few of these errors in other places as well and not just in the narrative of Noah.

Now  this is what it literally says in the KJV with me editing a few things to make it say what it really says in Hebrew, listen closely my dear friends and you will pick up some truth by the fact a region is being talked about not a particular mountain. Again, this is taken from Genesis 8:3-4.

Quote:

"And the waters returned from off the earth continually: and after the end of the hundred and fifty days the waters were abated. And the ark came to rest in the seventh month, on the seventeenth day of the month, upon the mountains of Urartu."

Close Quote

If you go to heshallgovern.com you can link to this truth from the front page of the website.

Keep in mind, in order to prove that the first five books of the Jewish bible were not written by Moses, let me say this: when a person writes about a society or culture --- that society or culture -  either must exist or it had to have had existed in order to mention it. Like I said, the Jewish narrator said that the ark of Noah came to rest on the mountains of Urartu, a kingdom came into existence about 614 years after the death of Moses and lasted for only about 260 years. That is - from the years between 850 BCE to about 590 BCE, whereas Moses died around 1464 BCE. A long time before.

So, my dear friends, the current torah was written during this time and not by Moses. This also explains why the death of Moses is talked about at the end of Deuteronomy whereas he would be able to do so. Yet, some vile and wicked preachers will tell you things that are contrary to the truth. For they utter great lies, by saying,  [QUOTE] "Well because Moses was such a great prophet he even wrote about his death in great detail and the things that immediately followed his death." [CLOSE QUOTE]

OYYYY, you would not believe some of the non-sense I hear from preachers and how dir-ranged they are, yet people buy into their non-sense.

In all honesty - to you,  my listening audience and to myself, as an educated guess by using the clues found in the Torah, the current torah or the first five books of the Jewish bible were probably written either during the time when Sennacherub, King of Assyria hauled off northern kingdom of the Israelites, called the Kingdom of Israel, into exile. Which occurred around 720 BCE. Or, they could have been written around 597 BCE when the King of Judah and many of the people of the Judah or the Kingdom of Judah where hauled off into exile by Nebuchadnezzar - king of Babylon, to Babylon. Which is in modern day Iraq, near Baghdad. Among those that were carried into exile was Daniel, Ezekiel, shadrach, meshach and abidnigo. This was the first group that was lead into exile, the second group came 11 years later, in 586 BCE, when Nebuchadnezzar burned down the Holy Temple and destroyed or hauled off the sacred things of that Temple and put them in the temple of his pagan god, which was a god named Marduk. But according to history, by the time the 586 came around, the Kingdom of Urartu was already gone for 4 years. So its hard to say when it was written, just some time after 850 BCE when the Kingdom of Urartu came into existence and possibly a few years after its fall, like people would still call Russia the Soviet Union, even though it fell several years before.

So it could have been written for the exiled northern Israelites so that while in exile they will not lose their history, heritage and culture while in exile. Or for the same reasons, to those in Babylonia, when Nebuchadnezzar took captive the southern Israelites of the Kingdom of Judah. These things are lost to history, because of our sin. Yes, my friends, because of our sins, we lost the original law Moses, which was written in a totally different font than what is currently used in Israel. Thanks to our sins, we are scattered among the nations, the Temple does not exist, and the vessels thereof are either lost or destroyed and thanks to our sins we have been slaughtered over and over again throughout history, especially in WW2 and during the days of the Crusaders.

Yet, this is why I am on the radio, to call my brothers to repentance and everyone else for that matter, so that my Jewish brother would rid the land of Israel from Trinitarians and Muslims, Hindus and Buddhists. To re-establish the ancient monarchy that governed all their affairs by the laws of the prophets and nothing else, being a holy Theocracy. Those, that want to be apart of Israel and the teachings of the prophets, that includes the real and genuine Jesus, must be circumcised and keep all of the Torah, the feasts and sabbath and so on, then we will be the true light of the world once again. Like Elisha was to Naaman or Jonah to the people of Nineveh, who convert 120,000 thousand non-Israelis. Praise be HaShem the holy and only God of Israel.

Yes, my friends, if you did not hear me to clearly, the messiah of Judaism is NOT the God of Israel, he is NOT the child named Immanuel in Isaiah 7, like one preacher said last week on the radio, as well as many others will teach. The child Immanuel in Isa 7 was born around 738 BCE and this prophecy has nothing to do with the messiah, if you read the text, it says that before the child know how to choose the right from the wrong, the kings of Aram and Israel will be dead, which took place during the days of King Ahaz, the King of Judah. Listen, my dear friends, the messiah of Judaism was promised on oath to be born from the seed of 6 men. These men were Abraham, Isaac, Jacob and Judah, then David and Solomon. If my betrothed wife, became pregnant before I approached her or had intercourse with her, is that child mine? NO, rather that child is the son of someone else, in a similar way. If my very own daughter became pregnant without my committing incest with her, is her child my son? No. but someone else's. The narrative of Matthew and Luke is utter non-sense and outright lies. This whole myth started when some ignorant person took a Greek translation a saw the word virgin there and Immanuel and jumped to the conclusion that this was talking about the messiah. Which it is not my friends. Furthermore, for those of you that think that the bible is without error, if you read the two gospel accounts of the virgin birth, in one story Joseph and Mary own a house in Bethlehem and that is where the so-called Magi came to when they found Jesus. And after Joseph and Mary went down to Egypt and came back they wanted to return again to their home, yet went up to Nazareth instead. Whereas in the other gospel, the gospel of Luke, Joseph and Mary actually live in Nazareth and because of a census, they had to go to Bethlehem and while there Mary gave birth to Jesus, then afterward went back up to their home in Nazareth, and never going down to Egypt. Thus, a blatant contradiction. Now let me tell you another contradiction, in the book of Luke, Mary visits a woman named Elizabeth, who was the mother of John the Baptist. I you read the narrative, Elisabeth knows that the child in Mary's womb is the promised messiah of Israel, the greatest prophet to be born, the actual son of the living God and not the God of Israel himself. Yet, John the Baptist, according to the Luke's account is the cousin of Jesus, yet in the Gospel of John, John the Baptist claims that he does not know who the messiah is, but that the reason he came baptizing was so that he would be reviled. In truth, my friends, if John was to some prophet and thus a holy person, would he not be lying?

My friends, the Gospel of John is the only, theeee only Gospel that is reliable, in John's gospel, Jesus is the son of David, by the seed or semen of Joseph and not by some virgin birth. Another thing to point out is the fact, when Jesus goes to his home town of Nazareth to speak in the synagogue one particular sabbath, no one, not even a single soul knows he is the messiah, yet according to the two gospels of Matthew and Luke, many people know that he is the messiah right at his birth. Yet, of all places in the world, would you not think that the very place Jesus grew up, where he lived for years, the people would not know that this person was the messiah? 

Don't let people deceive you my dear friends, just like the Ark of Noah did not come to rest on Mt. Ararat in Turkey so too was it ever prophesied that the messiah was to be born from a  virgin, nor was he. Like I said, what did the Gospel of John is the most reliable gospel and parallels the prophecies of the prophets and paints Jesus in a greater and holy light whereas the other gospels paint him in a way that he not only did NOT fulfill particular prophecies, but that he sinned against the God of Israel, by eating regular bread on the feast of unleavened bread, at his last supper - which according to the gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke was the passover meal, I dare anyone to look into the Greek originals to seek the truth and you will see that I lie not. Whereas in the gospel of John, his account contradicts the other three gospels by saying that this was simply a regular meal and that the passover took place hours after his death on the cross.

Likewise, in John's gospel in John chapter 1 verse 45 [quote], "Philip findeth Nathanael, and saith unto him, We have found him, of whom Moses in the law, and the prophets, did write, Jesus of Nazareth, the son of Joseph." Philip being a follower of Jesus, how did he know anything about Jesus, unless Jesus told him who his real parents were.

Again this is what is said in John ch 6 verse 42, "And they said, Is not this Jesus, the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know? how is it then that he saith, I came down from heaven?" So you see my friends that these people knew nothing of some virgin birth, who lived with Jesus and his family for years. Do you not think that these people from his home town would not know such things if such an event was widely known at his birth as the gospels or Matthew and Luke claim? Matthew is full of errors as well as Luke. I do not want to sound as a doubter or some faithless person, but the fact of the matter is that the prophecies take president over some narrative from someone that never was an actual eyewitness to Jesus, whereas John was an actual disciple of both John the Baptist and Jesus.

Again, what does Peter say in the book of Acts on the day of Pentecost? This is what is said in Acts 2

One preacher, in his corruption, tried to prove that Jesus was Immanuel or God in the flesh by using a passage found in Mark 2 concerning a man being brought to Jesus through a roof and the first thing that Jesus said to the man was [quote] "

I finish up............

Thank you for reading this transcript - I just jotted it down so ignore any grammar problems

Maregaal Ben Yaakov