Notes of Maregaal

1. 3:30 PM, 8666, I have learned that if I need to find something - whether a drink, food, or

an object - then all of a sudden my head will move for some reason without me intending for it to

move but, nonetheless all of a sudden I see the object or whatever I was looking for. It seems to me,

because this has occurred many times, it is the Lord moving my head and directing my eyes or an

angel close by me that does it. Not all people are able to discern this, however. This seems to be the

same when it comes to being tested as well. What I mean is this, for this is how I notice: I will be walking or

traveling by car or whatever, and just minding my own business. Then all of a sudden my head will

turn toward someone that I did not know was even there in the first place. Then lo and behold that

person ends up being a girl or woman not dressed with modesty, to say the least. Thus, I am

deliberately tested to see whether or not I turn back away from the sight.

2. 8652, If an individual will suddenly think, "I wonder where so and so is?" or "I wonder how so and so is?"

Then all of a sudden that person either knocks on the door or calls or drives by and honks, that is a sign

that Jesus or his angel is talking to you, but you did not have enough discernment to figure it out. Thus,

what actually occurred was that the angel of the Lord said, 'So and so is coming.' Or, 'You will soon see

so and so.'

3. My note prior to 8486, Adam and Eve where actually quite unique. For when they where made, they did

not have the same challenges as a baby does. This is in regards to talking and learning. For when they

were made they were able to talk and understand everything they heard right from the start without ever learning.

4. Things to pray for: To have holy emotions, desires and moods. To always have a pure attitude and

personal qualities and character. May my motives, reasons and intentions always be upright and holy.

May I only have interests that are holy. May I never have unholy urges or desires. Let me be a great

servant. Grant confidence and bravery. May I never be shy. Let me have patience and make me

courageous, valiant. Make me more humble, modest, meek, wise and smart. Make me very intelligent in

Your eyes Father God. Help me to have perfect integrity. May I be prudent in all things and areas. Give me

discernment and discretion. Help me to be perfected in loyalty. May I be more friendly toward others and

always honest. Help me to be like you, Lord Yehoshua. May I be strict and loving. Please grant your peace

and gladness. Give me graceful speech. May I always be fun. Teach me your ways Lord Yehoshua and

make me into the man you want me to be. A prophet and one set apart. Let me know dreams and

please grant visions. Use my gift of 'tongues' to witness to foreigners. Give me a measure more of faith and tell

me please what to do so that I can raise the dead, heal the injured and sick and to make people whole again

as well, period.

5. When you throw a rock, it does not just have a forward speed, which would be how fast it is traveling. Rather

there are several speeds going on at once, at least five speeds. Here is a picture I made:

What eventually brings my rock down to the earth is two things. It's pressure against air itself, since

air is a substance. For this is how birds fly, their wings push off of it. It is like me swimming. I am not able

to move across the water unless I push off of it. If I jump in with a running start, my sheer speed will carry me

through the water until the water's constant resistance or pressure slows me down. Another way to say it is

if I were to throw a metal ball against a brick wall, the wall would stop the ball from moving forward, this is

because of me throwing it and there is not enough strength. But if I were to put the metal ball in a canon, it would

burst right through the wall and then eventually slow down to a stop. For all the pressures against the ball

cause it to finally stop. The air makes it slow down and 'gravity' pulls it down until it hits the ground. Even

when it hits the ground it does the wall scenario, until it just cannot pass through the dirt any more because of

the dirt's resistance. But, I suppose if the dirt was not there, it would go to the center of the earth and just

levitate there. Thus, the center of the earth must have the dense-est stuff there. So the Lord did great things!

The lighter things are in the atmosphere. Air is at our head level, then higher up is helium, hydrogen and

whatever else. Thus as things fall at the same time, regardless of weight, they will keep falling until

something more dense will stop it. In the same way, I suppose if you were to fill at least three balloons

up with three different elements, such as air, helium and hydrogen and then go to the bottom of a pool,

they would probably rise at the same time, thus seeming 'gravity' does not really exist. For those

balloons would travel upward in an opposite manner as dense things travel downward. Thus saying: because

one balloon is full of air, it is obviously lighter than the water, thus it will rise until it reaches its zone where its

weight abides, but because there is the balloon itself in this experiment, the weight of the balloon keeps it on the

top of the water, whereas the other two balloons keep going. Whatever one is lighter of the two, helium or

hydrogen, the heavier one will keep going until it hits the floor of its level, because the balloon itself keeps it

on the floor of its zone. While the other balloon keeps going up, because it is even lighter until that reaches

its zone. Therefore, it seems everything is based on density, not gravity. But even that seems interesting,

because as mentioned, I suppose things would just levitate in the center of the earth, if it did not have the

ground itself to stop my metal ball. Too much to think about.

6. David knew aerodynamics, this is why he picked five smooth stones for his sling. For if he did not pick five

stones that were oblong, because the stones would have gotten some lift as a wing would and veered off from

target by not going straight. This is also why the bullets of the first guns ever to be made were steel balls.

7. The Lord either granted tools to Adam or, he showed Adam how to make tools so that he could 'work'

(Gen 2:15) the ground of Eden. Also, after he transgressed he was either able to keep the tools,

or he made new ones so that he could 'till the ground from whence he was taken' (Genesis 3:23).

8. When the Torah says that Eden was in the East, a person might ask, 'East of where?' The 'where' is

Jerusalem. Thus, the history of man starts there and also shall end here with judgment.

Judgment will take place in its vicinity.

9. Genesis 3:7 indicates that sewing is not just a woman's job. For it says, "Then the eyes of both of them

were opened, and they realized they were naked; so they sewed fig leaves together and made coverings

for themselves."

10. Using Genesis 3:7, this word "sewed" in "they sewed fig leaves together," does not necessarily

mean they used thread or yarn. Not because they did not have any, for they very well could have.

For all they needed was a flint stone in order to shave some wool off of some sheep and

twist the wool together. But most likely, the word 'sewed' would probably be better translated as,

'hemmed' or even maybe better as 'weaved.' As in, 'weaved a green vine in and out of the leaves.'

11. 2 Chronicles 3:14 says, "And he made the veil of blue, and purple, and crimson, and fine linen,

and wrought cherubim thereon (JPS)." Or, "And he made the veil [of] blue, and purple, and crimson,

and fine linen, and wrought cherubim thereon (KJV)." This verse seems to point out that the 'fine

linen' is different than the material used for the 'blue, purple and crimson.' If this is the case, it can

be of mixed material. But if we look at Lev 19:19 it says, "neither shall there come upon thee a garment

of two kinds of stuff mingled together." This commandment however is regarding wearing a garment,

not about other things, as maybe in this case. However, to get to the heart of the matter, the three

things other than the 'fine linen' are mere colors. Thus the word, 'and' might be the wrong word. I

will underline what I am talking about. "And he made the veil [of] blue, and purple, and crimson,

and fine linen, and wrought cherubim thereon (KJV)." Well, in the Hebrew it looks like this:

But nonetheless, just because 'fine linen' is pointed out as different than the three, it still does not

mean the veil was mixed material. For as mentioned, the three things mentioned are mere

colors, thus they could have be linen yarn instead of a finer linen. Or, the word 'and' could possibly be,

'a.' To read more like, "And he made the veil of blue, and purple, and crimson, a fine twisted linen."

Remember, these are just notes. So lets look in Exodus 26:31 to see what is commanded about it.

"And thou shalt make a veil [of] blue, and purple, and scarlet, and fine twined linen of cunning work:

with cherubim shall it be made (KJV)." So you see it is pretty vague. So the veil could either be

one of these three things:

a) All linen, some of it made of linen yarn and fine linen.

b) or it was mixed with something and fine linen

c) or the whole veil was of fine linen and blue, purple and crimson were its colors.

12. Rain did not fall until after Adam was made. For before he was made, that is before the sixth day,

the Lord caused a mist to spray up from the ground to water the ground. I suppose it was done

by geysers.

13. Many people confuse chapter 1 and 2 of Genesis, thinking there are two creation stories. The fact of

the matter is that Chapter 1 is a summary of the first 7 days, I say seven, because whoever put the

chapters and verses in the bible put the 7th day as a part of chapter two, instead of in chapter one.

Chapter 2 talks about the quick leading up to the sixth day when man was made. Then when the

sixth day arrived, the Scripture gives the details of what went on that day.

14. Exodus 32:25, "Moses saw that the people were running wild," means that the people were

naked, dancing, praising and worshiping the golden calf.

15. Apparently, only five type of animals were to be sacrificed

a. the bull (or ox in some versions (an ox is a male cow or bull))

b. a goat

c. a lamb, or a sheep, or a grown-up sheep, which is a ram

d. a dove

e. a pigeon

16. The Tent of Meeting is not the Tabernacle, rather, it is a part of the Tabernacle. Like this:

Therefore, there should no longer be any confusion when you read a statement referring to

a commandment as in Exodus 40:32 that says, "They washed whenever they entered the

Tent of Meeting or approached the altar (for sacrifices & burnt offerings), as YEHOWAH

commanded Moses.

17. According to 2 Chronicles 3:10-13, it "seems" like those cherubs have only two wings, instead of four.

18. In thinking about the five sacrificial animals that are commonly used in scripture, when it comes to a

being clean from a corpse, why is a red female cow used or a red heifer? Maybe because Eve sinned in

deed first, thus fortifying death to all people as the word "surely" in "you will surely die" means.

And why also a red one? Well, on the same note, the word/name "Adam" also means 'red

ground,' not just ground or dust.

19. One could actually see the thrones of the Father and His son if you had the ability to get to that wonderful

and glorious far away place. For Their Thrones are far above all the stars and galaxies. For above all the universe

is a great water dome. That water is the water that is talked about in Genesis 1, that is the upper waters,

after being divided with our waters (the seas/oceans), and between these two waters are the stars and

galaxies and obviously our sun and moon and planets. Their Thrones are right above those upper waters,.

in the heavens.

20. Even in the Mishna, in Pesachim 4:9, we even see the righteous King Hezekiah destroying medical

books or "the book of remedies".

21. Regarding 2 Kings 20:7, the figs were not used for medicine, but rather to make a type of band aid

or a seal over the scar or wound Hezekiah had. It was a lump of pressed figs, that was used, according to scripture.

22. I heard a legend or myth the other day by a man named Levy Goldman. He told it to me through a question,

"Do you know how one can tell it is Spring?"

With that I responded, "By the sundial. Once the shadow of the sundial, caused by the brightness of the sun,

reaches the midpoint from its journey from the winter solstice mark to the Summer solstice mark."

He said, "Well, you can tell by looking at the horns of the moon when it is a sliver."

"What horns?" I asked.

He said, "The ends of the crescent moon / sliver of the moon look like horns. When these horns are sticking

straight up, then you know it is Spring."

With that I say, "This is FALSE, in fact. This is because the moon never hits the same place in the sky or

latitude line at the first Rosh Chodesh of Spring from year to year. For in order the moon to have its "horns" directly

upward, as Levi assumes, the moon would have to be over the equator or parallel to the sun during this same

Rosh Chodesh in order for this to hold true. In fact, this is would be more rare to see than an eclipse. This is

because the moon is constantly moving up and down the latitude line. For if you had a sundial made and also

observed the celestial bodies for just one year, you will notice some things. You will see that the sun will make a

circuit of going from the winter solstice mark to the Summer S. mark and back again in a time of 364 - 365 days.

Yet the moon will run the same circuit in about 27 days. Thus, for the two bodies to be directly over the same place

during a Rosh Chodesh, in Spring, is rare in and of itself. Because of the rarity, the "horns" are more pointed to the

right or to the left, then directly straight up.

People believe all sorts of nonsense, so please keep yourself clear from these pollutants.

23. Integrity is not a gift, thus nor is salvation. Integrity is gained by attentive prudence and obviously the

willingness to be that way. Salvation is gained in the same manner. For salvation is only obtained by

the righteous. Thus, if one is not righteous through that integrity that person shall never obtain

salvation from Yehowah. Do not let the false and wicked preachers deceive you. For forgiveness has

nothing to do with making one righteousness. In truth, forgiveness is overlooking one's wickedness or

rebellion. Thus, just because one is granted forgiveness from someone does not automatically change the

person's character and demeanor from being a offender to one that is holy and upright. Thus, all those

that promote, "grace" / "saved by undeserved favor" shall be cast into hell for they never truly

convert. That is, changing their conduct and demeanor, from sinner / rebel to saint / one that is holy by

obeying the torah with integrity. They simply assume they are saints or people that are saved

because of their grand deception.

24. What, in truth, is the "gospel?" The word, "gospel" is a Latin word for "good news / story / tale / message."

The dictionary meaning of 'gospel' still does not tell us what the "gospel" is. The "gospel," in fact, is

that the long awaited messiah has finally arrived and that he is here and that we can now sit under his personal

teaching versus a prophet that speaks in his name. That was the "good news" of that time. Thus, the writtings of

Mark, for example, can actually be called, "the Good News told by Mark." even though Mark highly taints the

holy son of the God of Israel. For Mark accidentally makes Yehoshua to look like a sinner by eating regular

bread during the Feast of Unleavened Bread and etc.

25. By a man named "Chancellor Arnold M. Eisen, JTS."

"....my attention, when reading the opening parashah of the Book of Deuteronomy this year, has been riveted

by a single little word in the first line of the first chapter. Describing the site of Moses' final oration to the

Israelites—the book in its entirety comprises that address—the Torah recounts that it took place be-ever ha-

yarden, "across the Jordan," (Deuteronomy 1:1). The narrator's point of view is not that of the events described.

We are instead placed inside the Promised Land, looking outward, across, to the place where the Israelites

heard Moses' speech. Only after hearing it did they take the final steps toward the land promised to their

ancestors—and inherited by us. What to them was faith, hope, expectation, is to us, the Torah's readers, fact,

history, achievement. They did get to walk the land. So, too, in 2007, can we. The little word be-ever, "across," is

crucial to all that Deuteronomy comes to teach us.

I know, of course, that for some scholars of Bible there is a much simpler explanation of the word. It proves...

...that Moses did not write the Torah.

26. Poor Leah:

According to the following passages in the Torah, Leah never slept with Jacob at night,

but only Rachel did; except for the nights in order to fulfill her marital rights. Let's look at the passages to see

what I am talking about:

Genesis 30:14-21

14. And Reuben went in the days of wheat harvest, and found mandrakes in the field, and brought them

unto his mother Leah. Then Rachel said to Leah, Give me, I pray thee, of thy son's mandrakes.

15. And she said unto her, [Is it] a small matter that thou hast taken my husband? and wouldest thou take

away my son's mandrakes also? And Rachel said, Therefore he shall lie with thee tonight for thy

son's mandrakes.

16. And Jacob came out of the field in the evening, and Leah went out to meet him, and said, Thou must

come in unto me; for surely I have hired thee with my son's mandrakes. And he lay with her that night.

17. And God hearkened unto Leah, and she conceived, and bare Jacob the fifth son.

18. And Leah said, God hath given me my hire, because I have given my maiden to my husband: and

she called his name Issachar.

19. And Leah conceived again, and bare Jacob the sixth son.

20. And Leah said, God hath endued me [with] a good dowry; now will my husband dwell with me,

because I have born him six sons: and she called his name Zebulun.

21. And afterwards she bare a daughter, and called her name Dinah.

27. Wisdom taught through farming:

Some rows are harder to plow than others

This can have several meanings, but here is one that is very applicable when converting people: some people

are harder to convert than others.

28. In this short study, we are going to look at the true meaning behind the name "Melchizedek."

Someone might argue the true meaning behind the name of M-L-CH-[Y]-TZ-D-CH, commonly translated

as "Melchizedek" ("King of righteousness") in Gen 14:18. But before we get into his name, let us sidetrack

for a moment to show when he lived. Genesis says that he was the King of Salem, which became the "City

of David" a little more than 1,077 years later under King David. So how did I come up with "more than 1,077

years later?" Well, in Genesis 14 [where "Melchizedek" shows up], Ishmael was not yet born. Ishmael was

born two chapters later in Genesis 16:16 when Abraham was 86 years old. Remember also that Isaac

was born when Abraham was 100 years old (Gen 21:5). Thus, this "Melchizedek" came before the

birth of Ishmael. So, let's do some math in order to show my figures when Melchizedek lived.

Let's look at the math

Abraham was 100 years old when he begat Isaac.................................2049 [age of the earth] = 0 years

Isaac begat Jacob and Esau when he was 60 years old........................2109 [age of the earth] = 60 years

Jacob was 130 when he entered Egypt...................................................2239 [age of the earth] = 190 years

430 Years passed from Jacob entering Egypt to the Israelites leaving.....2669 = 620 years

480 years passed from the Exodus to the 4th year of King Solomon.......3149 = 1,100 years

Minus the four years of Solomon ............................................................3145 = 1,096 years

Minus 33 years David reigned in Jerusalem after he took it by force

in 2 Samuel 5:1-9................................................................................... 3112 = 1,063 years

Now Ishmael was 13 and Abraham was 99 when they both were

circumcised (Gen 17), thus minus 14 from the age of the earth

of the first line in this math and add 14 to the second number..................2035 = 1,077 years

The time when Abraham ate bread with Melechizedek was a little bit more than 1,077 years before

King David took Jerusalem. "Apparently," within those 1,077 years the kingdom and dynasty of

"Melechizedek" fell to the Jebusites, unless Melechizedek was a righteous Jebusite, for the first time that

the word "Jebusite" occurs is in the next chapter following the Melechizedek passage, in Chapter 15. On

another note, which I just found [at 1:30 AM Dec 3, 2007], Melchizedek could have been an Amorite. I will

get into this after awhile in this short study. Here is the quote given to Abram,

"In the same day Yehowah made a covenant with Abram, saying, Unto thy seed have I given this land,

from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the river Euphrates: The Kenites, and the Kenizzites, and the

Kadmonites, and the Hittites, and the Perizzites, and the Rephaims, and the Amorites, and the Canaanites,

and the Girgashites, and the Jebusites."

This Melchizedek named the city "Salem;" that, or he kept the name of the city as it was. Nonetheless, by the

time King David took it from the Jebusites the city was already renamed, "Jeru-salem." Jeru-salem means,

"One whom contends with - peace." This is my view of the name of "Jerusalem." I say this because so-called

scholars interprete the name to mean, "teaching of peace," "possession of peace," or "habitation of peace."

However, I derive my views from the Tanach itself, so let me give my examples, which are only three:

a. In 2 Chron 20:16 there is a place in the desert called, "Jeru-el." Like I said, the "scholars" interprete this

name as "teaching of God," but I interprete this as "one whom contends with el." In this particular verse

there is no direct interpretion from the Tanach vs. us trying to figure it out.

b. In 2 Samuel 11:21 there is a name of a man named, "Jeru-bbesheth." The "scholars" somehow

come up with a semi-correct interpretion even though this particular verse does not interprete itself.

Likewise, this is the only place this name is located. Nonetheless, the scholars come up with these

interpretations, "shame will contend," and "with whom the idol contends." I would interprete this as,

"with whom 'Besheth' contends." "Besheth" - in truth - might be lost to history; most likely this is a name of

an Amorite god.

c. Derived from this last example is where I get my views for all four words that start with "Jeru-," the word is

"Jeru-Baal." It is a name that was given to the holy servant of Yehowah, who was Gideon, in Judges

6:31-32 and there we find the Tanach giving us its own interpretation. Let me just qoute two verses:

And Joash said unto all that stood against him, Will ye plead for Baal? will ye save him? he that will

plead for him, let him be put to death whilst [it is yet] morning: if he [be] a god, let him plead for himself,

because [one] hath cast down his altar. Therefore on that day he called him Jerubbaal, saying, Let

Baal plead [or contend] against him, because he hath thrown down his altar.

Now I will move on with more studies about Melchizedek. In Deut 18:9-10 it says, "When thou art come

into the land which the Yehowah thy God giveth thee, thou shalt not learn to do after the abominations of

those nations. There shall not be found among you [any one] that maketh his son or his daughter to pass

through the fire." I list this command because some people do not think that Yehowah is referring to

Molech here, but He is, even

though this false god's name is not mentioned here. It is, however, mentioned in 2 Kings 23:10, "And

he [Josiah] defiled Topheth, which [is] in the valley of the children of Hinnom, that no man might make

his son or his daughter to pass through the fire to Molech." That being said, Moses was telling the people

that Molech worship was going on in the Promised Land and that they needed to be aware of it and

eradicate it and do not let the heathen there ensare you. All that being said, I have mentioned somewhere

else on this website [namely HERE], I tell and show that many of the names of people, of any certain land,

would have their local or people's diety or god within it. Therefore, one can argue, even though it is not

valid - that "Melechizedek" does not mean "King of Righteousness," but "Molech is Righteous."

Let's look at the spelling in Hebrew to show what I mean:

In Leviticus 18:21 Molech is spelled like this: מלך. The "ך-" in this name is the same as the letter כ.

In Genesis 14:18 Melchizedek is spelled like this: מלכי-צדק

Do you see how one can argue that this person served Molech, because his name apparently has Molech

in it as other kings had the names of their gods within their personal names. Likewise, as we see by reading

Leviticus 18, Molech was worshiped in the area, thus giving an illusion that maybe this person did serve

Molech or possibly his parents, who named him. In truth, however, I am twisting the scriptures in a deliberate

fashion to make an apparent argument or case. I will now go on to prove why this argument is not valid, in

case an archeologist wants to make some sort of case about it.

First off, "Melchizedek" does NOT mean "King of Righteousness," as the "Book of Hebrews" proclaims.

The reason for this is because of the yod that follows the word "king"or the apparent "Molech." The yod

being "י." This little letter at the end of a word usually means "my," as in "my God," or "my lord." As we

can see on the top of Psalm 22 where it says, "Eli, Eli [אלי אלי] .....," or "my God, my God...."

That being said, this person's name could either be, "My King is Righteous" or "My Molech is Righteous."

In truth, it is the former, not the latter. Why? Well, as we see, this man was King of Salem during the days of

Abram and during this same time Lot did not yet have any sons yet. In fact, the reason this man came out to

greet Abram is was because Abram just conquered 5 kings - who took his nephew, Lot, captive. Lot begat

his two sons after the destruction of Sodom and Gormorrah. When they were born, they were named Moab

and Ben-Ammi. In Genesis 19:38, the Torah says that the children of Ben-Ammi are the Ammorites. Now

if you do your studying on all of these subjects or topics you will come across 1 Kings 11:7 which states that

Molech is the god of the children of Lot, the Ammorites. For here is what that passage says,

"Then did Solomon build an high place for Chemosh, the abomination of Moab, in the hill that [is] before

Jerusalem, and for Molech, the abomination of the children of Ammon."

Thus, do you get my point? The foul and false god, Molech, did not come into existence on the laundry list of

false gods until after Lot died, for Lot served Yehowah. Therefore, it would be impossible for "Melchizedek" to

mean, "Molech is Righteous." On a bigger footnote, Abram would not dare give 10% of all the plunder

of the 4 kings and their military to a Molech worshiper. Likewise, a real "preist of EL-ELYON" would not keep

a name with Molech in it. Then lastly, the greatest footnote of them all, The God of Heaven and Earth would

not dare say about His son, "you are a priest forever in the order of Melchizedek [Psalm 110], if Melchizedek

was an idolater whom kissed the feet of Molech.

-------------------------------------------------

[3:15 AM Dec. 4, 2007, 8-24-6180] Well, doing this study, it looks like the "Book of Hebrews" and other

commentaries don't really tell the full truth of the meaning of this person's name. I say this because of the

added extra letter within this name, that letter being the yod, "י". This yod changes the whole meaning

actually. For this yod on the end of a word usually means, "my," like "my God," or "my lord," or ....

Thus, "Melchizedek" literally means "My King is Righteous," not "King of Righteousness."

29. Where is Eden? Well, based on my other notes on this website or this book [whatever you are reading from],

Genesis through Deuteronomy was written during the days when the Kingdom of Urartu existed, for this is

where the Ark came to rest, "...on the mountains of RRT." This "RRT" was given three 'a's to spell ARaRaT,

which is a major error from the Jewish scribes that inserted the vowels in their scrolls that later came to be

known as the "Masoretic" manuscripts. For the original author of Genesis, he obviously knew where the ark

was, but for us that live 2750 years later, starting with the Empire of Urartu, saying a statement like, "the ark

came to rest on the mountains of Urartu" is like saying, "the ark came to rest on the mountains of California."

I say this because the Kingdom of Urartu was a huge place. Likewise, does this also include their tributaries?

For this is how the ancient kingdoms were. Nebuchadnezzar was called the king of kings, not that Babylonians

populated all corners of his Empire. When a group or race of people would rebel against the king or try to break

a foreigners yoke from off their neck, the ruling king would then make war against that people to bring them

back under his authority and rule, so that they would become his subjects. But mostly so that they would give

him gold, silver, bronze and other things of value (i.e.; firs, trees for lumber or orcherds, cotton, pottery and...)

Nonetheless, with this "Urartu" in mind, that is being in existence during the author's time, so the same with

"Eden." Remember, many of the places of history were named after the tribal heads of a particular family. Like

Judah, like Tubal, like Moab, Mitzraim [Egypt], Cush and so on. "Eden" was the name of a person. Thus, when

you read the Torah keep that in mind, for it says, "And Yehowah Elohim planted a garden eastward, in Eden."

Remember that this name would be irrelavant if people of the author's day did not understand what he was

talking about. Thus, the author was giving the modern name of that region at that time, when he was penning

the book. Let's look at a particular passage in 2 Kings 9:11-12,

Behold, thou hast heard what the kings of Assyria have done to all lands, by destroying them utterly:

and shalt thou be delivered? Have the gods of the nations delivered them which my fathers have

destroyed; [as] Gozan, and Haran, and Rezeph, and the children of Eden which [were] in Thelasar?"

This passage might be of little value to you in the English translations, because the so-called "scholars"

failed to give you are deeper rendering of the passages and names. This word, "Thelasar" is actually

pretty rich in its detail of where "Eden" was located, but it's richness is lost in this vile translation. As I

mentioned earlier, namely in #28 of this paper, the people of the past would put the names of their gods,

within their personal names or the names of their children when they were born. This is also the case with

their cities on many accasions. This is what is going on here. An example of this awful translation would be

like callimh a very modern city in Israel "Thelaviv." In truth, the city is called "Tel-Aviv." Even more literal would

be saying it like this, "Mound or Mount of Aviv." For the word "Thel" or "Tel" means: mount, mound or hill.

The last part of the name of "Thelasar" is actual "Ashur." Thus, with this insight the author is telling us that

the garden that Yehoshua planted in the east was possibly near or on the hill next to the city of ancient Ashur!!!

-------------------------------------------------

THINGS BEFORE THEY ARE FORGOTTEN:

A poem or song by me:

I don't convert to man -

for man leads me astray

I convert to the Lord

for He is the way

Do not laugh at evil, nor scorn folks

Do not worry about anything, this is different than being concerned, where you would do things in order to

prevent particular evils

You must not worship none other, except Yehowah, the God of Avraham

Worship Yehowah in the beauty of holiness

Heed His voice

Intepret His visions and dreams, they are His words

Destroy all books and literature that are not of Him or that blaspheme Him, as the wicked book of Mormon, that say

the God of Israel is a polygimist as well as His holy child and that His holy child has a mother. Yehoshua has no

mother and Yehowah, the God of Israel has no wife, the son of the Holy One of Israel made His son from His own essence, not from His loins, like Eve was taken from the essence of Adam, not from his loins. As Adam has

no parents, so the same with the God of Israel. As Eve has no mother, so the same with the son of Yehowah.

When Yehowah sent His son into the world, you must NOT believe that he was born from a virgin girl, but from a

couple thatt had intercourse, where the man, Joseph, was literally from Zerubbabel and thus, from the wonderful and holy King David, the mighty servant of Yehowah and His son.

These are the months of the Jewish Calendar, that are known from archaic Judaism

1. Aviv

2. Ziv

7. Ethanim

8. Bul

9. Chisleu

http://www.mesopotamia.co.uk/ziggurats/explore/exp_set.html

-------------------------------------------------

30. Who truly wrote the book of Acts and apparently the Gospel of Luke?

Well, in my observation, it would have to be Titus, and not Luke. I say this because of what is said

in Acts 21 and what it says in Paul's epistle to the people that called there town Galatia in chapter 2:1

For in Acts the word "we" is used, "And when we were come to Jerusalem, the brethren received

us gladly [Acts 21:17]." Well, the question is who is the "we." Well, according to Paul's apistle it is only

three people, that being Paul, Barnabas and Titus for here is the verse, "Then fourteen years after I

went up again to Jerusalem with Barnabas, and took Titus with [me] also."

Now the question is this? How can we know which of the two remaining individuals wrote the book. Well, if

we read the book of Acts and the Gospel of Luke, it is very clear that the author of the book of Luke does not

know Judaism very well. For he wrote down that the messiah was born from a virgin girl, whereas the

prophecies concerning the messiah all say that he must be born in a carnal and natural way, thus being

the direct offspring of Abraham, Issac, Jacob, Solomon, Jesse, David and Solomon.

Remember that way back in the far past angels came down and married some of the daughters of mankind,

thus violanting their lofty postion. I say this because, this children were a new breed of specie, a crossbreed.

Meaning they had no direct link to Adam, for they were not of his lineage. Well, after some years the God of

Israel killed everyone with the flood, excpt Noah and his family who were of pure stock from Adam and Eve.

Well, after the flood the angels came back and did the same things all over again. This time however, these

Children had no direct link to Noah, nor Adam. With that being said, if the God of Israel were to do the same

upon a virgin girl, that child that would be born would not be the son of David, which the messiah must be, not

the blunt 'son of God' according to the flesh, even though the messiah is the son of the God of heaven, according

to the spirit.. For he was made before the foundation of the heavens and the earth. In fact, it was he that made

them.

Another thing that the Gospel of Luke does is that we see Jesus, supposedly and torah observant man, if

he were in fact the moshiach of Israel, eating leavened bread during the Feast of Unleavened Bread. For in

most English version bibles don't truly have what kind of bread that he broke on the night he was betrayed.

However, according to the Greek text, the author of Luke says that it was "artos" bread. Meaning that it was

regular bread, thus making Jesus a sinner and disqualifying him as being the messiah, if this were truly the

case. However, according to the prophecy itself in Psalm 41:9, that bread was to be regular bread, meaning

that night was not going to be the Feast of Unleavened Bread where the Passover meal is eaten. For

according to John's account, this all occurred during the night, the beginning of the 14th of the month. Meaning

it was a regular night and a regular meal. For John says in John 18:28, "Then led they Jesus from Caiaphas

unto the hall of judgment: and it was early; and they themselves went not into the judgment hall, lest they should

be defiled; but that they might eat the passover." For one must only eat the Passover during the night and if

any of it is left until the morning it must be burned in the fire. So, therefore, it is very clear that the author of

"Luke" does not know Jewish customs, which would be appropriate if he were a disciple of Paul, who taught

that Gentiles need not observe the Torah. Whereas, Barnabas, on the other hand would have or should have

picked up this serious error of testimony, that being: eating regular bread on the Feast of Unleavened Bread.

Therefore, by educated guess, if only three peolpe define the word "we" in Acts 21 - then it would seem that

Titus wrote the book of Acts and also the Gospel of Luke, since they start out the same. For both books lack the

the author's name.

All this came to me on 3/11/2008 or 12-04-6180+