gospelerrors

This page is not meant to upset you by proving that the gospels are NOT infallible, but rather they have many errors, untruths, and lore, versus facts. Also, Matthew, Mark, and Luke paint Jesus as a partial sinful messiah, and not as a flawless prophet, which the messiah was and is. Therefore, I will now give a list of a few things that are easily pointed out, and if you see commentary next to it, please read what I have. As for the rest, I will soon have some comments about them. Please e-mail me with questions and comments, thank you kindly and shalom.

Many of the errors that are found in the gospels are found in the so-called "Gospel of Matthew." If you read my online article called, "Was the Last Supper Jesus had with his disciples the Passover or Not?" you will see that Matthew was not even written by a Jew, let alone Matthew. In fact, it was the pagan Catholic Church that gave the name to the book we now know as Matthew. This is because they thought "it sounded like Matthew," even though they did not know the man.

1. In the Gospel of Matthew, you have the false story of the Magi coming to Bethlehem because of some grand

phenomenon in which a star led them, and it supposedly hanged in the sky where the messiah was; yet, no

one else noticed this new star. Also, they supposedly met Herod, visited Jesus, and went back by a different

route. You also have Herod murdering the children of Bethlehem because of the birth of a rival KING. Yet, not

even Josephus wrote about this "infamous" murderous story.

2. In the "Gospel of Matthew," Joseph, Mary, and Jesus went down and lived in Egypt after the Magi came, and an

angel warned Joseph in a dream that Herod was coming to murder the boy. Thus, making Jesus and his

earthly parents sinners, since it was commanded in the Torah that the Israelites shall not go down into Egypt

again. Click here to see the torah commandment.

3. In the Gospel of Matthew, the genealogies are in error, because he is lacking 2 folks in his list. Since we are

talking about this, the "Gospel of Luke" is way off as well when it comes to the genealogy of Yehoshua (he has

so many people in the list that are virtually nonexistent people.) He does not even have Solomon listed as

David's son, but some person named Nathan. If you know the prophecies, the messiah comes through

Solomon and the other kings of Judah. Look [here] to see the three lists of genealogies. On a footnote: the

messiah was NOT even born from a virgin girl, but by a couple that had sexual relations. This "virgin"

legend all started from the Septuagint translation of Isaiah 7, which has nothing to do with Jesus, but

a child that was born during the days of Ahaz, king of Judah, as a sign for King Ahaz. The Septuagint

accidently has "virgin" (betulat in Hebrew) scribed there instead of "young maiden" or "young lady/girl."

In Hebrew, the word in Isaiah 7:14 is not "betulat [beh-tu-lot]," which means virgin, but rather "almah,"

which means "young lady/girl." Moreover, Isaiah uses "betulat" 5 times in his book. Not even Jesus' brother,

James, mentions such things, only Matthew and Luke do based on the Septuagint and pure folklore that was

built up around the man named Jesus. In truth, however, according to the prophecy he has to be the literal son

-------------------PAGE 2 WHEN PRINTED------------

of David, by his actual seed, by sexual relations, else, he cannot be his son and offspring. Furthermore, the

people from Jesus' home town say, "Is not this Jesus, the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know?"

in John 6:42. No one talks about, nor knows about such a birth, except for Luke and Matthew. This is by no

means the only error in their gospels. We see that they are flawed because in their writings they portray Jesus

eating leavened bread during the feast of unleavened bread. If this were the case, this would disqualify him as

the messiah, read here

4. In the "Gospel of Matthew," when Jesus was transfigured on the Mount, "Matthew" writes that Moses was

there. Yet, this flies in the face of the doctrine of death, or the facts regarding death. Which is, when a man

dies, the man is dead, as well as his spirit, not nonexistent, but just asleep. Then, when the resurrection

takes place, both will come alive; unless one is righteous, and is beheaded. For a man's judgment does not

take place at death, but rather on the day of Judgment, click here to see. "Matthew" puts Moses at the Mt.of

Transfiguration when he is dead, and his spirit sleeps. Furthermore, it was the Lord himself that ended

Moses' life, and he also buried him. This also means that the account that 'Jude' gives is also false, (in

regards to Michael and Satan fighting over Moses' body), because the Lord is the one that buried him.

Furthermore, the actual eyewitness to the whole story, Peter, never mentions this in his letter when he does

recite that day in 2 Peter 1:16-18.

5. The "Gospel of Matthew" proclaims that Joseph, the step-parent of Jesus, was a righteous man. This was

because he wanted to put Mary away secretly, versus putting her to death, after he found out that she was

with child by someone other than himself. This is regardless of them actually being married or not, because

Joseph had already betrothed her. For if a man defiles a betrothed lady, it carries the same penalty as the

lady that is married; ie, adultery. Read the Torah here to see. Her being pregnant was the apparent 'proof,' of

her adultery, regardless if there were any witnesses who "caught her in any act." For this is the same outcome

of Judah's daughter-in-law when she was found to be with child by someone other than her dead husband's

brother; as the law requires, and so this is how Judah judged her. Thus, if Joseph was a righteous man, he

would have done things in the same manner as Judah did. Though, we know the accusations were different.

Tamar was accused of being pregnant by harlotry, whereas, Mary would or should have been accused of

adultery. Both crimes result in death, even though how they are put to death is different. Tamar was supposed

to be burned alive, whereas, Mary would have just been stoned. I am just pointing out the discrepancy of "if

Joseph were righteous," not anything else with this #5 in this list.

6. In the "Gospel of John," Jesus tells someone to pick up a cot/mat on the Sabbath. This seems to be the

only flaw in the Gospel of John. It also seems you can write off this error as a mere mistake,

not because of his insertion of this situation, but because he apparently was not an eyewitness to this event,

but rather he was told of it. Click here to read the story.

7. Jesus tells a false parable of the poor man Lazareth and a rich man dying. Click here to see why Jesus never

said this parable.

8. In the book of Matthew after Jesus died on the cross, the tombs were opened by an earthquake

and the dead walked among the town. Something so great and miraculous as this is recorded in no other

gospel, and Flavius Josephus makes no mention of so great a miracle in any of his writings of those days.

9. According to Matthew, Mark and Luke only, Jesus' last supper was the Passover meal, thus

making him out to be a sinner when he tells his disciples to buy a sword since that night is a

special Sabbath; that is the first day of the Feast of Unleavened Bread. Also, the priests were not allowed to put him to death on a Sabbath.

10. They have Jesus asking the Father to take the cup away while praying in the garden, so that he

does not have to go through with his death on the cross. This contradicts his own statements of why he

came.

11. Did you know that according to the gospel of Matthew 27:5, Judas hanged himself after he betrayed Jesus?

Yet, in Acts 1, Peter gives an entirely different account of how Judas died. Peter says that he took the money

that he received in his betrayal of Jesus and went and bought a field with it. Yet, while he was walking in his

own field his stomach burst open out of the blue and his guts spilled out; and thus, he died as a result.

12. The whole story of the "virgin" birth, or the only two stories in the gospels surrounding the "virgin" birth are

----------------PAGE 3 WHEN PRINTED----------------

false. READ # 3. After Jesus rose from the dead and went back to heaven from where he came, the people

of that day combed through the Tanach to see what things fit or what sounded spectacular. When they came

across the Isaiah 7 verse, in the Septuagint, not the actual Hebrew scrolls, they judged it to be talking about

Jesus because the name "Emanuel / Immanuel" means "El is with us." This "El is with us" was in the

mentality as in the days of the Judges when Yehowah would raise a judge among the people and would free

the people from their enemies or whatever the case was. Therefore, considering what Yehoshua taught and did,

they thought this was referring to Yehoshua, and thus; thought he was born of a virgin girl. They therefore,

made all of these legends and myths surrounding the man named Yehoshua. The fact of the matter is that he

was born like everyone else is born, after his married parents had intercourse, he was conceived. Yehoshua

was the firstborn son of Joseph and Mary. Normally, at the point of conception the spirit of the person is

made/created, but in the case with Yehoshua, he being a spirit (as angels are spirits) and the second in

command in all of existence already, was disranked and inserted into the newly conceived baby's body during

this conception process.

This virgin birth non-sense doctrine has been around for an awfully long time, and it is one of the main doctrines

in the traditional pagan churches. They are very misled though, because they fail to read and do not have a

background of Judaism to discern truth from.

Thus folks - stop believing that the NT is inerrant. Remember, it is not what is written about Jesus that is

inerrant, it is the man himself, okay!!!

Again, Jesus is not God in the flesh, this is a deliberate ill and vile-translation by those that believe the

falsehoods of the pagan Catholic church from the Nicene council of 325 CE. Judaism NEVER claimed that

the promised moshiach is 'GOD,' this is why most Jews do not accept Yehoshua as their moshiach, because

of the absolute ignorant people that think they are "witnessing" for HaShem, WRONG!!!!

13. According to Exodus 6 where it says, "And Elohim spake unto Moses, and said unto him, I [am] Yehowah:

And I appeared unto Abraham, unto Isaac, and unto Jacob, as God Almighty, but by my name, Yehowah, was

I not known to them," the narrator got this wrong. I say this because in Genesis 14 we see Yehowah himself,

telling his name to Abram. This is what it says in Genesis 14, "And Abram said to the king of Sodom, I have lift

up mine hand unto Yehowah, the most high God, the possessor of heaven and earth, That I will not [take] from

a thread even to a shoelatchet, and that I will not take any thing that [is] thine, lest thou shouldest say, I have

made Abram rich: Save only that which the young men have eaten, and the portion of the men which went with

me, Aner, Eshcol, and Mamre; let them take their portion."

Here are other places where the holy name of Yehowah is mentioned before the time Moses came to

Mount Sinai, in regards to the people of the past actually saying His name in a quote versus the narrator of

Genesis placing His name in the narrative:

In Genesis 1 through Exodus 3:15 the holy and beautiful name of Yehowah is listed 145 times; out of those

145 occasions we see that this holy name is quoted 51 times before and counting Exodus 3:15.

Here is a short list of the people that say this holy NAME directly:

1. Yehowah himself (4) Gen 15:7, 18:14, 28:13, Ex 3:15

2. Eve (1) Gen 4:1

3. Lamech (1) Gen 5:29

4. Noah (1) Gen 9:26

5. Abraham (8) Gen 12:8, 13:4, 13:18, 14:22, (Two times in 22:14, 1 normally, another time in

the name = Jehovah-Jirah), 24:3, 24:7

6. Sarah (2) Gen 16:2, Gen 16:5

7. Angel of YHWH (2) Gen 16:11, 19:13

8. Lot (1) Gen 19:14

9. Abraham's servant (10) Gen 24:12, 24:27 (2), 24:35, 24:40, 24:42, 24:44, 24:48 (2), 24:36

10. Laban (5) 24:31, 24:50, 24:51, 30:27, 31:49

11. Isaac (3) 26:22, 27:7, 27:27

12. Abimelech (2) Gen 26;28, 26:29

13. Jacob (6) Gen 27:20, 28:16, 28:16, 30:30, 32:9, 49:18

14. Leah (3) Gen 29:32, 29:33, 29:35

15. Rachel (1) 30:24

16. About Nimrod (1) Gen 10:9

Even if one wants to debate these things as inserts on the part of the narrator by means of being excited, or

----------------PAGE 4 WHEN PRINTED---------------

being on the other side of the Sinai story and thus knowing the name of the Holy One, we can still prove the

Exodus 3:15 statement to be false, by the mere names of our ancestors. Remember that the surrounding

cultures inserted the names of their gods within the names of their children as we can see with Nebo in the

case of Nebuchadnezzar, or Bel in the case with Belshazzar, or Baal in the case with Jezebel (Jeze-baal), or

Asherah as in the case with Tiglathpileser (Tig-lath--pil-eser). The few people that only believed in monotheism,

that being Abraham, Isaac and Jacob and their wives (except for Rachel for awhile) - starting with Jacob - did

the same thing as the cultures around them. Thus we have:Yeho-dah or Yehu-dah = Judah; and Yeho-seph

(Ps 81:5) or Yo-sef = Joseph. As time went on and the children of Jacob increased in number you can also see

the increase of the names of the children of Israel having the name of Yehowah within their personal names.

Here are a few:

Eli-Yahu = Elijah

Yeho-shaphat = Jehoshaphat

Yeho-shua = Joshua / Jesus

Yeho-ram = Joram or Jehoram

Avi-Yahu = Abijah

Yeho-addan = Jehoaddan

Yirme-Yahu = Jeremiah

Yesha-Yahu = Isaiah

Yechiz-ki-Yahu = Uzziah

-----------------------------------------

QUICK NOTES BEFORE I FORGET:

1. Ezra 6:14 says that Zechariah is the son of Iddo, but Zechariah himself says that he is the son of Berechiah,

the grandson of Iddo the Prophet in Zech 1:1.

2. Stephen, before he was stoned mentioned that 75 souls entered into Egypt with Jacob, Acts 7:14. Yet,

Genesis 46:27 says that 70 people, counting Jacob himself, of the house of Jacob were now in the land of

Egypt when he entered.

3. Who really sold Joseph into Egypt, According to one verse in Genesis, it seems as if Joseph's brothers

did not get a chance to sell him at all, because while they were still thinking about doing it the Midianites came

and took him out of the pit and sold him to the Ishmaelites, Gen 37:28. Yet, later in the same chapter it

contradicts itself, by then saying the Midianites sold him to Potiphar, Gen 37:36. Then if you keep reading, it

contradicts itself again in chapter 39:1 by saying that is was the Ishmaelites that sold him to Potiphar.

Whateverr the case is, he was sold. For according Joseph's own words in Gen 45:4-5, his brothers did in

fact sell him off. There may not be to many contradictions here, because the original ancient Hebrew version,

[which was lost] does not have the same grammar rules as we use today. Thus, it is much harder to distiguish,

sometimes, where one segment of a story ends and another one starts. In Chapter 37, it seems very clear that

Reuben did not see Joseph get pulled out of the pit and by the reaction of his brothers, it seems as though they

also know nothing of the taking of Joseph.

4. Jesus did not say, "Eli Eli....." on the cross, because he wass NEVER seperated from his God, and he

Never had sin, rather he died for those that have sinned. For sin only exists with those that rebel.

5. The veil ripping

6. The whole magi story is false

7. The whole story aboutt Herod slaying the infants is false

8. The whole story about Jesus going down into Egypt as an infant is entirely false.

9. The whole conversation with John the baptist, about John needing to be baptized by him, is false. Because

John claims in the book of John that he does not know who the moshiach is until the Spirit of the Father

should rest upon him.

10. The author of the "Book of Hebrews" is plain ignorant - for he says that Melchizedek did not have any parents,

Yet, he was either a Jebusite or Amorite

There is a lot more but I am sleepy right now, I will get back to it later, remember I am just dealing with the four gospels, not the rest of the New Testament. It would be righteous to throw away all of Paul's letters, by the way, since 99% of all that he wrote is false. Click here to see my paper on the errors and wickedness of Paul. This paper about Paul does not point out typos that would not effect the core of someone or a person's core beliefs,

---------------PAGE 5 WHEN PRINTED-----------

because those things would simply be accidental mistakes, and can be fixed. Rather, it points out that what he taught and practiced contradicted the teachings of Yehoshua and the prophets that came before Yehoshua, thus proving, and not just accusing, that Paul was and is a false apostle and a heretic.

Maregaal

Back to the Top

An introduction to this 3 page document:

To the surprise of many, Jesus is NOT the person they think he is. Who then is the real Jesus of history? There are many voices out there telling us who he might or might not be. Muslims on the one hand try to paint Jesus in one way, whereas those of "mainstream Christianity" do so in a totally different way. Notice I said, "mainstream Christianity" instead of "what is found in the gospels." I say this because, mainstream Christianity does not understand the Jewish writings or the writings of the Jewish people; and thus, also the things of the Jewish bible. This obviously includes the doctrines therein.

So, what does all of this mean? It means that the prophets of the bible were in fact Jewish or Israeli and they therefore, lived in the land of Israel. Because of this, things must be taken from that historical backdrop and so to have a correct understanding of things written from that culture you have to "know" that culture. So, to add to what I just said, the ancient society of Israel was founded on the very teachings and laws that the Israeli prophets gave, versus what other societies were/and are like. Thus, that ancient culture and society was a theocracy. With this in mind, the holy prophets made certain that the people very clearly learned or picked up the doctrines and beliefs, and laws of Judaism and that they were to pass these things on "diligently to their children [Deut 6:7]."

The Jewish faith and society has taught things for thousands of years that so-called "Christians" do not even acknowledge as truth. In fact, most of all things that "Christians" believe do not coincide at all with Judaism in the slightest.

Why is this so important, you might be asking? Well, it is very important because not all of the things that have been attributed to being said by Jesus were actually said by him - this has been proven. This can also be applied to the things surrounding him and his life, and not just his words. To understand the Jewish messiah properly, we must understand the foundations of Judaism and this is why the understanding of Judaism is so fundamentally important to anyone who wants to know Jesus. Now to give you an example of what I just said, the first three gospels were not written by actual eyewitnesses of Jesus' life or the things that he said. In truth, only one gospel (John's) was written by an actual eyewitness to the things surrounding Jesus and also John the Baptist, a mighty prophet. John was a personal disciple of both John the Baptist and Jesus. With that being said, John's gospel has more authenticity to being accurate and correct surrounding the life and works of Jesus because he was an actual disciple and personal friend of Jesus'. When you compare the gospel of John with the other three you will find grand differences between his and the other three. Like I said, the other three gospels came from men that became believers in Jesus long after Jesus went to heaven, not while he was on earth; unlike John.

So, what does Judaism say about the messiah? One, he is not the God of Israel in any form, rather he is his actual and physical son. In a similar fashion, in the false Greek mythology, the Greek gods had sons and daughters, but in real truth, the God of Israel in fact, had a son. The moshiach / messiah is the firstborn of all creation; thus, he had to be there at creation before all things. In fact, because this person is so powerful, it was he himself that made the heavens and earth, not his God. The son only obeyed his God in all matters. Next, Judaism teaches that the messiah would be conceived and born in a carnal and regular fashion, when a husband and wife would come together, not by some virgin birth.

In regards to what is attributed to Jesus, Judaism teaches that when a man dies, he does not face the judgment upon death. Rather, that person's spirit remains asleep in the ground until the body resurrects from the dead and at this same exact time the spirit of the person shall also awaken. I say this because of two particular false stories recorded in the gospels concerning life after death, that being Lazarus and the rich man and what Jesus said to the thief on the cross.

The messiah according to Judaism does not annul the law of Moses, nor the laws that any other prophet gave over time. Like the time when Samuel gave the children of Israel the laws surrounding the kingship, because until Samuel, the people ruled by tribal heads, by the laws of Moses, and so they were not under any worldly king. With that being said, the messiah would be like the other prophets, teaching righteousness and holiness and telling the people how to observe

------------PAGE 1 WHEN PRINTED---------------

the laws of the prophets correctly. He would also fix any wrongful interpretations or conduct that the people fell into over

the years as Elijah, Elisha and the other prophets had to do.

The only difference between the moshiach and other prophets is this: Even though they both would be born from a man

and woman, they differed in spirit. The spirit of a man is made the very moment one is conceived, whereas the spirit of the messiah existed from the very beginning and the God of Israel was going to insert him right into the conception process vs. making a a new spirit for that particular body that ended up being Yoshua, or Joshua Ben Josef, or Jesus son of Joseph. With that being said, this prophet would be unlike any other prophet in regards to his personal knowledge. Why? Because from the very beginning he witnessed all things. Thus, he was a walking encyclopedia of information, in regards to true history, what the particular people were like and he could even tell you what heaven was like and how he brought the world about. And so, even though a regular prophet could reveal the ancient paths, he nonetheless had to wait for that information; whereas Jesus already knew these things. This was because he is very old or ancient. He is nonetheless a made being as all sons are younger than their parents. Do you understand what I am saying? To put it another way, if he is younger than the Eternal One, then it is impossible for him to also be eternal as well.

Now considering all that I just said, you can see how this particular view is far different than what Mainstream Christianity teaches. Over the years, Trinitarians have tainted several key gospel passages to make it sound as if Jesus is "God in the Flesh" even though he is not. No, rather he is HaShem's personal son in the flesh and so was sent from heaven. Again, the messiah is the greatest servant HaShem, the God of Israel, has, not that he is HaShem Himself in the flesh. For we Jews have only One True God. All of these things must be taken into consideration when defining who the real man of history is.

Maregaal Ben Yaakov