First of all, this article is not intended to offend the people that blindly believe that the ''New Testament" Canon in whole was written from the mouth of the LORD; nor that it was inspired by Him or compiled by His doing. I put the 'New Testament' in quotes because there was never a testament that was made old; or one that was done away with. Rather, the truth of the matter is that there is an additional covenant tacked onto the existing covenant. This covenant is the 'rule of law,' or of holiness and righteousness (which is the 'Torah' outright) and anything added to it by prophets. The additional and new covenant was made in Yehoshua's (Jesus') blood. It ONLY replaces the atonement offerings (which purged us from our sins) found in the main covenant - the Torah - with the lamb the God of Israel offered in our stead; that is Yehoshua. Therefore, Yehoshua's death does not ratify the covenant or pact that was made at Mt. Sinai because this is the main covenant. His death on the cross, once and for all, changed over the atonement from animal offerings at the holy temple, to the messiah. Even Yehoshua says that he was not sent here to abolish this law; thus, indicating it must still be observed. For he says in Matthew 5:18, "I tell you the truth, unless heaven and earth should pass away (first), not one jot or tittle shall ever pass away from the Law (that is the Law of Moses, the prophets and the writings) till ALL be fulfilled." This means: Every prophecy by the prophets will have been fulfilled by the time the day of judgment occurs, and for some prophecies: 'is being fulfilled' will also be at that time, (i.e.,on the day of judgement). What this means is that after one is already judged and when the Father and His son are sitting in front of you, you will not need to wear phylacteries/tefillin, nor tassels to remember them. Nor will you be given in marriage anymore; therefore, the command to "be fruitful and multiply" will be done away with, as well as the rest of the marriage and family commands. Likewise, since the resurrection will have taken place so that all people will never die again, the laws concerning death and uncleanness of a dead body will also be done away with. Furthermore, since you are in their presence, burnt offerings and freewill offerings will also be done away with. Those that were leprous during their lifetime will be healed, if they were righteous that is; thus, there will be no need to observe those laws. In fact a huge chunk of the law will be done away with at that time, but as Jesus, as well as ALL of the prophets of the Lord have said, the Torah will continue throughout all generations until the day of judgment. This is when all people will be judged by that law; therefore, if they are duped by an old-worthless Pharisee named Paul to assume that a person does not need to observe the law anymore in all of its content, versus just maybe the moral aspect of it, they obviously will be found 'lacking' and not doing it. Therefore, this person will not be found righteous, nor holy. That means they will not inherit the kingdom, but rather will enter the eternal fire of the moshiach's prison - hell, forever. For I hear people who claim that they have read 'the bible' from cover to cover; yet, just by looking at them you can see that they have not learned a single thing from it, especially preachers that say this. These people practice lawlessness, or anomia as it is called in Greek. This is what Yehoshua referred to in Matthew 7:21-23 when he says there will be many who will be told to depart from him on the day of judgment, despite the miracles they did in his name. This is because these people practiced lawlessness - disobedience to his holy torah - this is whether or not they knew the torah and chose not to keep it, or because of ignorance in not knowing to keep it - it is the same before his eyes, they are lost and shall go to hell.
Furthermore, in Matthew 23:2-3 Yehoshua states that "you must obey all that the Pharisees teach as they sit in the seat of Moses," for they teach from what Moses taught. He likewise mentioned in Matthew 5:20 that "Unless your righteousness exceeds that of the scribes and Pharisees, you will by no means enter the kingdom of God." Do not take this lightly either, for the Pharisees and the scribes were scholars and knew all of the Law, as did the prophets and righteous men; thus, in the same phrase, even though not said outright, he is telling you that you must have a full knowledge of the Law in order to surpass their righteousness and enter the kingdom of the Father and His son, and you must be keeping it with a holy pure heart. That Law, by the way, consists of well over 2,000 commandments versus what non-Jews think that it is - a mere 10 commandments, minus of course, the sabbath and its laws! So if Yehoshua, the one who will judge all men someday, tells you that you must do what the scribes and Pharisees tell you to hold fast to and do, I suggest that you do it. Yehoshua also mentions that he did not come to call the righteous to repentance, but those that have turned aside from the Law that was given to Moses. For what the Law of Moses does is show someone what sin is and how to avoid it by obeying those commands, for those that do the commands are holy and righteous. The Law given to Moses on Sinai is obviously the very will and rules of the Lord of heaven and earth. Those that do what He commands in that Law are always sinless, or free from sin. In other words, those that obey this Law fully have nothing to repent from, for they do what is right. Furthermore, what non-Jews fail to understand is that the commands ARE the very character of the LORD. For in them one can see what He likes and dislikes; also, all the commandments deal with the heart and with faith. For why do the commandments of 'Moses' if you do not believe that it was the Lord that told all people for all of time to obey them? Thus, the Law is all about faith.
Remember what I just mentioned, the Law consists of well over 10 commandments. In Exodus 20, we see that It was while the Israelites were at Sinai that they did not want to hear the LORD anymore, because they were sore afraid of the LORD. The LORD uttered only 10 commands at the time; after that time, Moses went up on Sinai to get the rest. So, those who are obedient to all these laws will be righteous in His eyes. Eventually, it will come to pass, that in time when He lets His son judge all people, those that have kept themselves pure from all evil by doing what He commands versus rebelling, and therefore, are righteous, will enter His son's kingdom. For the son will judge the world by the Law he gave to Moses on Sinai and to the prophets, for this is the God of Israel's Law and there is only one law for all mankind; moreover, there is only One True God for all of mankind to meet.
Now, to get back on track regarding this article, anyone that knows "church" history knows that the final formation of the 'N.T.' Canon took place hundreds of years after the resurrection of the Lord. All this took a significant role in how things got tainted and why Paul was included in the final result of the 'Canon'.
To tell you a brief summary of events, the church became tainted even before the fall of Jerusalem in 70 C.E., when Jews were banned from the city. This also means that the first church was banned, for they were Jewish. As mentioned, even before the time of the fall of Jerusalem, the masses were being taught Paul's false doctrines instead of the truth of what the Torah and the prophets teach. The Torah and Tanach teach that the atonement offerings would be replaced by Yehowah's only begotten son, Yehoshua, the messiah. That is all that would be replaced, for even Yehoshua on the night he was betrayed took wine and then said (Matthew 26:28), 'This is the blood of the new and everlasting covenant in my blood, for the forgiveness of sins"; not for anything else. Thus, meaning to transfer the atonement offerings to him, but everything else would still be intact. Therefore, all of the Law still must be done including atonement, but now atonement is done by faith in the sacrificial work of the Father, (and praying and asking for forgiveness of our sins in Yehoshua's name.) But that atonement only holds if one actually ceases from sins or disobedience to the Law.
The fall of Jerusalem by Titus in 70 C.E. is what brought about the banning of Jews from Jerusalem, which included the first church that was strictly Jewish. This means a lot when it comes to witnessing and converting the Gentiles and having them in turn do the same. For the first church, being Jewish, already knew the teachings of the prophets concerning the messiah even before ever coming to the knowledge of who that might be. When it comes to Gentiles, however, they do not have that background. Gentiles don't know the Tanach, nor were they ever raised with it. So, when Gentiles do convert it is done somewhat in ignorance, versus when it comes to converting a Jewish person with his background. This in fact, ends up being a big problem among the Gentiles because if this is the case, they would in no way know what is true or false or even know what are mingled teachings, for they wouldn't have any discernment because they have no foundation in the Lord's commandments and doctrines. So, what occurs is there is 'yeast among the dough' as Yehoshua would say. Would not the whole batch become fermented, or in other words, tainted? So, what am I saying? What if one of those Jewish people (Paul - which I will prove below) that was witnessing to the ignorant Gentiles was tainted? How much more so would the Gentiles be tainted? This is exactly what occurred in history. After the fall of Jerusalem and the dispersion of the first church, or when they just died off, things got tainted rather quickly because things were left in the hands of the ignorant Gentiles. And so it went, the people of this tainted Gentile 'church' ended up being the church elders. These "elders" eventually came up with the pagan doctrine known as the trinity, which is far from Jewish Roots and Torah teaching. They also introduced other heresies as well, but lastly they finalized the Canon we have today. Thus, without any discernment because of never being brought up observing the torah or understanding the writings of the prophets, the elders included the writings of Paul in this "Canon."
These writings of Paul are completely foreign to what the prophets foretold and taught, and obviously what the messiah himself taught as well.
To those of you that know about Paul, you know that he was a Pharisee. When Paul converted to believe that Yehoshua is the moshiach, he took along with him the traditions that were handed down to him from the school of the Pharisees that he attended for so many years. Many of the things he said in his writings were either his own inventions from the mindset of being an ex-pharisee, or they were blatant traditions of the Pharisees, or elders of Israel themselves that were passed on through him. I will show you what these differences are in regards to he and Yehoshua and the prophets. I do this in order to discredit his writings by the actual moshiach's sayings and the prophets that proceeded him, to show that his writings should have never been included in the formation of the Canon. Because of Paul's writings much harm has been done. The biggest harm in my opinion is: "the law is no longer necessary, for it was nailed to the cross" and "so you are saved by grace and not by works of the law, lest anyone should boast." Thus, with this kind of falsehood in so-called 'inspired' writings, it leads the ignorant even more astray. People that do not know the teachings of the prophets, nor ever read their works or even if they do, they do not understand their works. For the prophets clearly said what would take place after the messiah's death, resurrection, and ascension when it comes to the Law. This would be that the Lord never changes, and that the laws in the Torah and in the prophet's writings must be fully obeyed at all times, as before Yehoshua's death.
-------------------------
The truth:
1) Paul mentioned death came into the world when Adam and Eve sinned. The truth of the matter is that death already existed; for the Tree of life existed for them to escape death. Adam and Eve chose to rebel and sin, and they ate from the other tree, (the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil), so the Lord sent cherubs to guard the way to the tree of life so they could no longer have the chance to escape death. This fulfilled the words of the Lord, "You will surely die" the day they ate of the wrong tree [FOR A MORE DETAILED ARTICLE ABOUT THIS SUBJECT, CLICK HERE].
2) Paul mentions in 1 Corinthians 8 and 10, that it is OK to eat food that has been sacrificed to idols, "just do not let your weak-minded brother in the Lord see you do it, because he will judge you and he should not judge you over food, since idols are not gods, but mere wood." The fact of the matter is that the brother judging him is correct. We see this when Jesus himself says in Revelation 2:14 that anyone that eats food sacrificed to idols will go to hell. The Law of Moses also forbids such, so do James and Peter in the book of Acts, and John does as well in 1 John.
3) Paul says that you do not need to circumcise your children or yourself if you are a convert to Christianity. The fact is that you are not under the covenant of Abraham and Jesus and the prophets if you do not circumcise yourself, as well as your children. Therefore, we see that Paul is foul and wicked and a false apostle.
4) Paul mentions that one does not have to observe sabbaths, new moons and festivals since they were a "mere shadow of things to come". The fact is that Jesus told us to observe the sabbath all the way to the end of time in Matthew 24:20. For what sense is there to "pray that your flight does not occur on the sabbath day," if the sabbath should not be observed? Furthermore, in Zechariah 14, it says that in the latter days after the Temple is rebuilt the fourth time (since the third one will be destroyed because of the false Jewish messiah) "you must go up year after year to celebrate the Feast of Tabernacles." For Jesus did not come to abolish the Law, but to do it without fault; therefore,
"fulfilling" it. Thus, we must also fulfill it since it is not done away with. Also, many of the feasts that are commanded to be obeyed in the Law of Moses are commanded to be observed "eternally."
5) Paul said that to be "absent from the body is to be present with the Lord." The fact of the matter is that when you die you are dead and in the ground until the resurrection. For what sense is there to have a great judgment day, if you are sent to heaven or hell when you die? The prophets taught that your spirit remains asleep until the resurrection, then we are judged. Furthermore, the meek do not inherit heaven, but the earth. And second of all, if you ever read Revelation 21 - the Father, blessed be He and His Name, comes down and lives with us - not that we go to heaven but to the kingdom of God. The same is true with the new Jerusalem "coming down out of heaven as a bride beautifully adorned for her husband."
6) Paul said that we inherit Adam's sin. The fact is that his sin was his sin and I have to obey the same laws. If I rebel, then I also sin, but if I decide to be holy then I do not sin. This is why Jesus said, "I did not come to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance." Thus, there are some of us that do not need to repent, because we have integrity. Unlike those that do not know the Law at all or simply believe there are just 10 commandments. Yet, they sin against 3 right away. They believe in the trinity, which is false; thus, having some foreign god and breaking the first commandment. They have Jesus pictures or other "god" pictures; thus, breaking the second commandment. And they do not know even what day sabbath is, let alone how to keep it. If you want to learn how to keep the sabbath, please go to my sabbath page, and write us so that we can help you convert.
7) Paul mentioned that we are saved by grace and not by works of the law lest we should boast. The truth of the matter is the Lord's grace is only on those that obey His law. Not on those that assume they can repent, but never change and think that is sufficient. No, rather you must be holy to be with a holy God. And you cannot be holy and godly unless you do what He says in His law and all of it, not just the "moral law." But also farming laws, outer appearance laws, festival laws, marriage laws and governmental laws; all found in the Law of Moses. This law is perfect, for it came from the LORD.
8) Paul says that Abraham was chosen to be the parent of many nations by mere chance because of the grace of the Lord. For this is what he says in Romans 4:
It was not through law that Abraham and his offspring received the promise that he
would be heir of the world, but through the righteousness that comes by faith. For if
those who live by law are heirs, faith has no value and the promise is worthless,
because law brings wrath. And where there is no law there is no transgression.
Therefore, the promise comes by faith, so that it may be by grace.
Here, I am just dumbfounded at the pure folly and falsehood of all of this. First of all, it was through
the Law that Abraham was even considered to receive such a blessing. For this is what the Lord himself said to Isaac, Abraham's son, in Genesis 26:2-5, after Abraham died (which totally contradicts the evil statement of Paul):
The LORD appeared to Isaac and said, "Do not go down to Egypt; live in the land where I tell you to live. Stay in this land for a while, and I will be with you and will bless you. For to you and your descendants I will give all these lands and will confirm the oath I swore to your father Abraham. I will make your descendants as numerous as the stars in the sky and will give them all these lands, and through your offspring all nations on earth will be blessed, because Abraham obeyed Me and kept My requirements, My commands, My decrees and My laws."
Not because "Abraham believed the promise I promised him." Therefore, He was saying it was because Abraham was a righteous man which strictly and only comes through holy living by deeds and conduct and not mere faith. Abraham was rewarded with a promise that he, even though he and his wife Sarah were both old and barren, would become the parents of many offspring that were "as numerous as the sand of the sea shore." And it was not until a long time of doing deeds of righteousness that he gained this promise. When he received it or heard it, he believed the Lord would do such a wonderful thing to him and his wife Sarah and so that too was counted as righteousness for him along with all the rest of his righteous life. Thus, Paul is totally misguided and lacks his real Jewish roots. On a second note in regards to what Paul said in this statement, namely "And where there is no law there is no transgression." There has always been a law, like I mentioned before, even Adam and Eve had it; this is a basic teaching in Judaism. Thus, Paul is corrupt for saying this also.
9) Paul says in Gal 3:17, "The Law, introduced 430 years later." Here Paul is talking about the Law of the Lord [the law of Moses] that was given to mankind at Mt Sinai. He claims that this took place 430 years AFTER Abraham received the promise that through his seed the nations of the earth shall be blessed and that his descendants would be like the stars in the sky for multitude.
The fact of the matter is that the 430 years is the time that the Israelites were in the land of Egypt, starting with Joseph being kidnapped and sold there. All this started when Joseph was 17 years old. Now to figure out how far apart the promise was until the people were on Sinai, we have to first use the time Jacob entered Egypt, then go back using birthdays.
Therefore, Jacob was 130 years old (when he entered Egypt (Gen. 47: 9 ) minus the current age of Joseph when Jacob entered Egypt. Which he was.......39, because 7 years of abundance had come and gone, and 2 years of famine were on the land, so far. Thus, 39-17=22 years, thus 130 - 22 years = 108. Therefore, Jacob was 108 years old when Joseph
was kidnapped and sold into Egypt and he was the first Israeli in Egypt.
Now what? We must know the age of Isaac when Jacob was born. He was 60 years old at that time (Gen 25:26).
Okay, so far we have 430 years of the people being in Egypt, Joseph being the first, plus 108 years for this was the age of Jacob when Joseph was sold, plus 60 years, because that is how old Isaac was when he had Jacob. Thus 430 + 108 + 60 = 598 years, so far.
Now, we already know Abraham was 100 years old when Isaac was born, but to find out how far away Sinai was from the promise we now must back track to when it was given. According to Genesis 12 we see the promise given at that time, when Abraham was 75 years old. Thus 100 - 75 = 25 years. So, let's add........ 25 + 598 = 623. Well, it was at least 623 years after, NOT 430!!!
Furthermore, the law was not introduced at Mt. Sinai like Paul assumes. The fact of the matter is that while the people were in Egypt for so long, they forgot the ways that the patriarchs had showed them how to live, except for a few things. So, the Lord had to teach them all over again, not that it was "introduced" to them. We can see the Law all through the torah before Sinai, because the God of Israel does not change and so we see his rules and laws long before Sinai. This is why the world was destroyed by water, because the people did not keep HaShem's Torah. Remember also, that the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah occurred before Sinai, not after. So with that being said, if there was no law yet at that time, then the God of Israel would have no just cause to destroy the people there for their homosexuality and other offensives.
10) Another contradiction of Paul is that all through Romans and his false writings he mentions that you are saved by grace and not by works. Yet, in 1 Timothy 2:15 he mentions that a woman will be saved through childbearing!!!! Not even Yehoshua or his Father said anything like this. Here are the verses:
1 Timothy 2:9-15
In like manner also, that women adorn themselves in modest apparel,
with shamefacedness and sobriety; not with braided hair, or gold, or
pearls, or costly array;
But (which becometh women professing godliness) with good works.
Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection.
But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man,
but to be in silence.
For Adam was first formed, then Eve.
And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the
transgression.
Notwithstanding she shall be saved in childbearing, if they continue in faith
and charity and holiness with sobriety.
Therefore, Paul is wrong even in this, for salvation is based on your obedience to the Lord, not whether or not you bear children. For it is the Lord that has the authority over a woman's womb to let her bear children or not.
11) On an off-shoot from #10, we come across another contradiction. Paul says in his letter to Timothy that Adam was not deceived, but the woman. Well, that is a half truth. Why? Because you can read the story for yourself and see that Adam was with Eve. It says in Genesis 3:6, "she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat." Thus saying, he heard the whole conversation and he did not say anything to rebuke Eve or tell the snake what the Lord commanded him to obey. Thus, you cannot say Eve was the only one deceived here, for the facts are that Adam still sinned, and if he sinned he got deceived by lust and reason of fact. Because the serpent did not lie in all that he said, for their eyes were opened and they knew good and evil like the Lord, and they also did not die. Thus, also saying, Adam apparently did not tell the command of the Lord all that diligently to Eve, because she assumed that you would immediately die mortally if you took of it, and that is not what the Lord said would take place, but that they would "surely" die. For they were already going to die before they even ate of the tree of knowledge for that is why the tree of life was there in order to escape death. So, because they ate of the tree of knowledge first, the Lord had cherubs guard the tree of life, so therefore, they could no longer escape death which eventually did come hundreds of years later. Furthermore, she added to the rules of the Lord by assuming she would die if she even touched it, instead of if she only ate it as the Lord commanded Adam before Eve was even made. For remember that Adam had to till and tend the garden and the two trees were included in this tending.
12) This next section I will just copy what I wrote to someone named Wil in an e-mail about Paul.
"I am not sorry to say, Paul is not sent from the Lord, at the beginning he was, but he quickly turned aside and did that whcih is evil and that he actually made things worse than what they were. For things were going pretty well until he came on the scene of history, regarding the Truth that is. Do you not understand that the apostles were with the Lord for 3 years and not a single time, not even once can you read in ANY of the gospels that Jesus ever uttered the things Paul talks about? Nor in the apostles' writings do you even find the same doctrine that was taught by Paul. Nothing is the same. Paul was a person that got knocked off his "high horse" by the 'light.' And so he learned that day that Jesus is and was his long foretold messiah, and he believed in him. And right from the get-go he goes to a man's house named Ananias. This is what Paul says about him in Acts 22 "My companions led me by the hand into Damascus, because the brilliance of the light had blinded me. A man named Ananias came to see me. He was a devout observer of the law and highly respected by all the Jews living there."
Now why in the world would a disciple in Jesus named Ananias be so devout to the law, if the law were done away with? This is because it wasn't done away with. Paul being an Israelite did go to synagogues and prove to fellow Israelites that Jesus was their long-awaited messiah; I will give credit where it is due. So, in this matter and only in this matter was Paul used. Because somewhere along the line he fell off the tracks, for Ananias is clearly obeying the law that consists of well over 613 commandments, not just 10 of them. Ananias was, obviously, around before Paul, yet, he is not a part of the 12 apostles. Do you see where I am going? I will continue so that you do. If he was in Damascus and not a part of the Twelve Apostles, how in the world did he come to know that Jesus is the messiah? Is it not assumable that he came to that knowledge through the apostles when they finally arrived there in the pursuit of "go and tell all nations (which is by the way another proven point of mine, regarding me refuting your statements about Paul, in which you say: "because of the Jews rejection of the Messiah the message was then preached to the Gentiles." When in fact, there was a command to do so right from the start as well as before Jesus even came, as in the case with Jonah)." Thus, why would Ananias, if taught by the apostles, not then drop the Law if this was taught by Jesus in those three years? He did not drop the Law because Jesus commanded it to be done, as did the Apostles. Furthermore, since Ananias was obedient to the Law, why in the world did not the Lord himself correct him; since Ananias heard the Lord so well in regards to Paul vs. himself - if he was in error according to Paul by continuing to follow the Law? For he had a conversation with the Lord in Acts 9:
In Damascus there was a disciple named Ananias. The Lord called to him in a vision, "Ananias!"
"Yes, Lord," he answered. The Lord told him, "Go to the house of Judas on Straight Street and ask for a man from Tarsus named Saul, for he is praying. In a vision he has seen a man named Ananias come and place his hands on him to restore his sight." "Lord," Ananias answered, "I have heard many reports about this man and all the harm he has done to your saints in Jerusalem. And he has come here with authority from the chief priests to arrest all who call on your name." But the Lord said to Ananias, "Go! This man is my chosen instrument to carry my name before the Gentiles and their kings and before the people of Israel. I will show him how much he must suffer for my name."
That is a great conversation! It also tells what the Lord wanted to do, as opposed to what actually took place.
What I mean is this, Yes, Paul converted in his thoughts and heart that Jesus was in fact the long awaited moshiach or messiah. He even went to synagogues and proved through the Tanach [the Jewish scriptures, erroneously called the 'Old Testament'] that Jesus was the messiah unto his fellow Israelites. But proving that Yoshua/Jesus is the moshiach through the Jewish scriptures is a far different subject than what Yoshua/Jesus truly taught. I hope you can understand this simple truth. It's like the funny saying that goes something like this: "Just because I stand in a garage doesn't make me a car!!!" Paul was persecuted among the believing Jews in Acts 21:17-24, not the non-believing Jews in regards to these passages alone. Paul was also persecuted by non-believing Jews as well, but I care not to discuss the non-believers right now. Yes, my dear friend, Paul might have had a great beginning, but he ended up like Solomon who became vile and a great sinner. In fact, according to Paul's own writings and the things set forth in the book of Acts, Paul was sifted into falsehood not long after his "run-in" with Jesus as he was headed to Damascus to persecute the believers there. I am speaking of the chronological statements found in these writings. Paul also took a lot of people down with him after he became sifted. For some, such as James, they did not go along with Paul's teachings all the way, whereas others outright rejected him, such as the "Galatians" and the Jews of Acts 21:17-24 and thousands of others, even some that Paul himself points out in 1 Corinthians 9:2, "If I be not an apostle unto others, yet doubtless I am to you." Jereboam, son of Nebat, did the same thing in the book of Kings after he became the first king of the 10 tribes of Israel, known as the Kingdom of Israel. When Jereboam sinned he brought down thousands of Israelites with him.
I hope that you will start doing all of the law like the apostles and Ananias did, even we at HeshallGovern Outreach and turn your heart away from Paul and tear out all of his writings.
13) This insert has nothing to do with a contradiction, but rather something factual to point out. Paul wrote a letter to the believers in a particular town after something awful occurred in his eyes. For Paul went to a town he called 'Galatia' and he preached there. He preached his awful grace theology there. After some time he moved on to the next place to spread his rubbish. Well, after he left, other missionaries came in and taught the real way of the Lord. That was to believe Yehoshua is the moshiach of Yisrael and that you must be baptized and follow all of the law that the prophets of Israel said in the very name of Yehowah, the God of Israel. For they also said that you will not be saved on the day of judgment unless you follow all what Moses mentioned as well as the prophets, which is true. Thus, these missionaries tried and did succeed in fixing them after Paul came and tainted them. However, when Paul caught wind of what was going on in that town he wrote them the very letter you have in your bible today. In that letter he says right from the beginning, "Who has bewitched (tricked) you?" As well as .... For all through his letter to them he is trying to persuade them back to falsehood through reason. Like, "Did you receive the spirit of Jesus through faith or by obedience?" He was trying to persuade them it was done solely through faith. The truth, however, is that this occurs by believing and so then obeying the message of the gospel. For if they did not obey in following Jesus and what the law said, they would have never received the spirit of Jesus and also the Spirit of his Father (the trinity is a demonic doctrine, this is why I am precise in my wording to show two Spirits, click HERE for an explanation of the two Spirits). He also says other non-sense to try and justify himself in regards to telling the truth vs. the other missionaries. One of those things is that Paul tried to have them remember the miracles he performed among them. But, as we can see in Jesus' very own words he will condemn to hell believers that cast out demons, prophesied and did miraculous works, because they did not obey the commandments or the Law of Moses (the Law of the LORD) (click HERE)).
Chapter 2 of his letter even goes into deeper detail to show you that he was far different than the real apostles. In this chapter Paul talks about the apostles in Jerusalem and how they wanted to have Titus circumcised, because he was a uncircumcised Gentile that came to believe in the Jewish messiah. However, Titus refused because of Paul's persuasion over him in the 'grace' theology. Here is the proof:
V1. Fourteen years later I went up again to Jerusalem, this time with Barnabas. I took Titus along also. V2. I went in response to a revelation and set before them the gospel that I preach among the Gentiles. But I did this privately (not openly, do you notice?) to those who seemed to be leaders, for fear (more like he did not say anything, because he did not want to get rebuked) that I was running or had run my race in vain (which he was). V3. Yet not even Titus, who was with me, was compelled to be circumcised, even though he was a Greek.
After this statement he goes on to say that he doesn't care who these people were and what they taught.
As for those who seemed to be important—whatever they were makes no difference to me; God does not judge by external appearance.
SHALL I SAY MORE? Paul is in error, very wrong and he left the path of real truth.
So, we see that Paul is a false apostle and you would be wise to rip out all of his writings that have led people astray for hundreds of years, because people do not know the Torah or the mission of the messiah. Therefore, Paul's writings should have never been included in the Canon.
14) Paul is an outright hypocrite and it is very easily proven in the book of Acts. Let's look at Acts 15 and Acts 21 and we will see Paul obeying the admonishing of James the brother of Jesus to go up to the temple with four men making a vow and stay for a week. This is done by Paul to avoid the crowds of the Asian Jews who have heard that he is in Jerusalem and they know that he preaches that Jews who live among the Gentiles do not have to keep the Law. He willingly goes up to the temple and stays for a week even!! So much for someone so sound in his grace doctrine, he is a hypocrite. I will write more on this soon....in the meantime, please read Acts 21 and see for yourself.
Shalom and love,
Maregaal Ben Yaakov
![(1.) This website tells the truth about the Jewish messiah (moshiach). (2.) That holiness comes through the observance of the full torah and condemns the trinity doctrine, as well as the 'saved by grace' notion taught by Paul [ the FALSE apostle]. (3.) It PROVES that the messiah in NOT God - yet, Yehoshua, is the moshiach, the only begotten son of the only God, the God of Israel !!!](link1.gif){kind=small}
